less than 3 weeks till the US election

Topics which don't fit comfortably in any of the other forums go here. Spamming is not tolerated.
Forum rules
- Please use the forum attachment system for jam images, or link to the CG site specific to the Jam.
- Mark threads containing nudity in inlined images as NSFW
- Read The rules post for specifics

kerry, bush, or other?

Kerry
34
59%
Bush
15
26%
other
9
16%
 
Total votes: 58

User avatar
Cope
Incompetent Monster
Posts: 7378
Joined: Sat Jul 31, 2004 8:37 pm
Location: Masked man of mystery
Contact:

Post by Cope »

Luprand wrote:Clever pun :lol: ... I am seriously giggling here, and I think my roommate's wondering what's going on.
Wow...I'm a comedian and don't know it!
I don't consider pregnancy to be a punishment; I consider it an amazing privilege and responsibility.
Not all women see it as such. Their body; their choice.
And if you're not willing to serve a term in office, then you shouldn't put yourself on the ballot, if you'll allow such an odd parallel. Imagine someone saying, "Well, after nominating myself for Kabuki Club President, running a long, hard campaign, and winning the election, I've decided the job is nothing but an inconvenience and I no longer want it. So I'm hereby disbanding the club."
You couldn't possibly be saying that women shouldn't have sex with men at all if they don't want to become pregnant....so I'll assume you're referring to women who gad about and don't use contraception. Even in this case, I stand by my previous point. We could say "we'd allow you to have an abortion, but you were promiscuous and now have to take responsibility for your actions," but that still makes it seem like a punishment.
Of course I'm biased. I don't have the organs to ever put myself in a situation where I'd have an abortion. I just consider the family to be an important part of society...
What exactly do you mean by "the family"? (No Mafia jokes, please).

Oh, and what does "anti-ZGP" mean?
Image Image
"I've always been fascinated by failure!" -Charlie Brown

User avatar
Jim North
Cartoon Hero
Posts: 6659
Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2003 10:55 pm
Location: The Omnipresent Here
Contact:

Post by Jim North »

ZPG = Zero Population Growth. When there's an overpopulation crisis in an area, some people believe the best way to solve it is for no one to have any children at all and then let nature take its course until there are fewer people and folks can start having kids again.
Existence is a series of catastrophes through which everything barely but continually survives.

User avatar
Andronis
Regular Poster
Posts: 80
Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2003 6:00 pm
Location: Alabama
Contact:

Post by Andronis »

One of the major problems with keeping people voluntarilly away from abortions comes from several of the people who are so obsessed with abstinence that they act like preventing contraception is more important than preventing abortions. But as my grandmother, who has lived next door to a Baptist minister for over 30 years, says, "Even these good Baptists I've seen always use their birth control so they don't wind up with more children than they can afford."
Image

User avatar
Brockway
Dirty Old Man
Posts: 3046
Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2003 11:57 am
Location: Texas
Contact:

Post by Brockway »

Technically, its not having no kids, since having a huge old population with no young working class is not good (Japan comes to mind) its about having the amount of people being born be equal to or less than the people dying. If people pair up and have only 1 kid, there's no branching out and the population gradually thins back down (hopefully.)

I'm not against abortion, I guess there are circumstances where it might be the best option, but its still sad to me. :cry:
Image
Sharp Hall. - Ya know... don't even go there. Very NSFW

User avatar
Andronis
Regular Poster
Posts: 80
Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2003 6:00 pm
Location: Alabama
Contact:

Post by Andronis »

Alaina wrote:I guess...Taiwan, because there was this reaaally good shrimp restaurant there.
Shriiiiimpy!
I love shrimp. I ate 75 once during an all-you-can-eat special at Red Lobster.
Image

User avatar
Cope
Incompetent Monster
Posts: 7378
Joined: Sat Jul 31, 2004 8:37 pm
Location: Masked man of mystery
Contact:

Post by Cope »

Jim North wrote:ZPG = Zero Population Growth.
Thank you, Mr North!
When there's an overpopulation crisis in an area, some people believe the best way to solve it is for no one to have any children at all and then let nature take its course until there are fewer people and folks can start having kids again.
Oh. I always thought ZGP entailed convincing parents to have no more than two children. To wit:

4 People (2 parents, 2 children)

When the parents die: 4-2=0 population growth.

Whereas parents who have (for example) three children:

5 people (2 parents, 3 children)

When parents die: 5-2=1 population growth.
Image Image
"I've always been fascinated by failure!" -Charlie Brown

User avatar
Alaina
Regular Poster
Posts: 511
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2004 4:37 pm
Location: Portland until California
Contact:

Post by Alaina »

Mercury_Hat wrote:Oh, no, if people want to have kids that's cool by me.

I sound really selfish when I say I don't want kids because they're noisy, smell bad, and suck up all your food and money, so just pretend it's because of "overpopulation" or something.
Ugh, I totally understand. Today was Halloween, and my friends were all giddy at the thought of passing out candy to children (I need new friends), while I decorated my door with signs like, "IF YOU CAN'T PRONOUNCE YOUR R'S, THEN DON'T BOTHER [ex. 'twick ohw tweat']" and "I HAVE ZERO TOLERANCE FOR SUPERHEROES, PRINCESSES, AND CREATURES OF THE NIGHT."

User avatar
Luprand
Cartoon Hero
Posts: 1767
Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2003 8:33 pm
Location: Cougar country
Contact:

Post by Luprand »

Cope wrote:You couldn't possibly be saying that women shouldn't have sex with men at all if they don't want to become pregnant.
Maritza Campos, in CRFH! wrote:Don't heat up the water if you're not going to take a bath.
I find it frustrating that the big reason people seem to give for abortion is "You shouldn't have to feel responsible for your actions." But then, that's just me.

In its own right, I would be much happier if the focus were less on "stop all abortions" and more on "let's help improve the adoption process" or similar themes. Rooting out the weed, if you'll pardon the analogy, is useless without planting something good in its place.
Cope wrote:What exactly do you mean by "the family"? (No Mafia jokes, please).
I'm not gonna go into that, as you'd find me so puckeringly conservative that you wouldn't be able to look directly at me without retching. I'd never condemn anyone on these boards for their choices or beliefs, but I've probably already taken too many steps toward Flamesville as it is.

--Sij
Torio - A cartoonist without a plot.
NeTrek and other low-quality scribbles.

User avatar
Andronis
Regular Poster
Posts: 80
Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2003 6:00 pm
Location: Alabama
Contact:

Post by Andronis »

Luprand wrote:
Cope wrote:You couldn't possibly be saying that women shouldn't have sex with men at all if they don't want to become pregnant.
Maritza Campos, in CRFH! wrote:Don't heat up the water if you're not going to take a bath.
I find it frustrating that the big reason people seem to give for abortion is "You shouldn't have to feel responsible for your actions." But then, that's just me.

In its own right, I would be much happier if the focus were less on "stop all abortions" and more on "let's help improve the adoption process" or similar themes. Rooting out the weed, if you'll pardon the analogy, is useless without planting something good in its place.
Cope wrote:What exactly do you mean by "the family"? (No Mafia jokes, please).
I'm not gonna go into that, as you'd find me so puckeringly conservative that you wouldn't be able to look directly at me without retching. I'd never condemn anyone on these boards for their choices or beliefs, but I've probably already taken too many steps toward Flamesville as it is.

--Sij
The last thing anyone wants during their day is a bunch of angry archliberal flamers. :-P
Image

User avatar
Cope
Incompetent Monster
Posts: 7378
Joined: Sat Jul 31, 2004 8:37 pm
Location: Masked man of mystery
Contact:

Post by Cope »

Luprand wrote:I've probably already taken too many steps toward Flamesville as it is.

--Sij
It was never my intention to start a flamewar, and I apologise if you feel I was pushing you in that direction.

I'll leave you alone now...
Image Image
"I've always been fascinated by failure!" -Charlie Brown

Wp
Cartoon Hero
Posts: 1335
Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2004 9:08 am
Contact:

Post by Wp »

Alaina wrote:
wp wrote:
Alaina wrote: Well...America's not really allied with Taiwan anymore. It's got a new policy that says it'll support the country that is attacked first.
Um... I don't think Taiwan will be doing any attacking anytime soon. But what we *should* do is follow our supposed principles and support democracy (Taiwan) instead of worrying about economic problems. Unfortunately that will never happen.

I think Taiwan will be safe in the meanwhile since:
1) 2008 Olympics in China
2) US wants to have an eye in the Pacific against a potential threat
Pfft...as if the U.S. is really gonna endorse a country just because it's democratic when its opponent offers exports and wealth. Iraq was for the oil, not the prospect of democracy.

Just because Taiwan's not about to attack doesn't mean China is either. They've got just as much to lose.

Anyway, if it happens, I won't know who to root for because I've got relatives in both countries. I guess...Taiwan, because there was this reaaally good shrimp restaurant there. Then again, China's peking duck is amazing.....life is so hard.
You could have just said you agreed with me :lol: Anyway, my point in saying that Taiwan is not about to attack is that the US is almost guaranteed to side with Taiwan if anything gets crazy. Taiwan will most definitely not be the one to initiate an attack if there even is one.

User avatar
Stucifer_the_maligned
Regular Poster
Posts: 97
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 10:04 pm
Location: bloomington IN
Contact:

Post by Stucifer_the_maligned »

Luprand wrote:And I'm kinda anti-ZPG in some ways, because if my parents had followed it, my brother and third sister wouldn't have been born, much less me (the youngest of 5 by 5 years).
if everyone believed in planned parenthood, i wouldn't be here. still, fewer people is better for the planet. but then again, how could we live in a world without Luprand?! i can't go on!
we are born by orbits, molded from spheres, and shaped by lines. there is no such thing as non sequitor.
http://horrendousacts.keenspace.com

User avatar
Luprand
Cartoon Hero
Posts: 1767
Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2003 8:33 pm
Location: Cougar country
Contact:

Post by Luprand »

Cope wrote:
Luprand wrote:I've probably already taken too many steps toward Flamesville as it is.

--Sij
It was never my intention to start a flamewar, and I apologise if you feel I was pushing you in that direction.

I'll leave you alone now...
Sorry about that; it's just that I can tend to be amazingly conservative in my viewpoints, and I'm only now learning to hold my tongue about some topics in polite company.

It's kinda one of the things I like about this forum; I actually have a chance to try and defend - and therefore understand - my point of view (and the time between posting is a nice time to gather my thoughts; you guys'd trounce me in a real-time debate :wink:).

--Sij
Torio - A cartoonist without a plot.
NeTrek and other low-quality scribbles.

User avatar
Cope
Incompetent Monster
Posts: 7378
Joined: Sat Jul 31, 2004 8:37 pm
Location: Masked man of mystery
Contact:

Post by Cope »

stucifer_the_maligned wrote:if everyone believed in planned parenthood, i wouldn't be here. still, fewer people is better for the planet. but then again, how could we live in a world without Luprand?! i can't go on!
Let us not contemplate events that may or might have been. To do so would probably lead to a debate concerning the morality of the Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombings... :P
Image Image
"I've always been fascinated by failure!" -Charlie Brown

User avatar
Stucifer_the_maligned
Regular Poster
Posts: 97
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 10:04 pm
Location: bloomington IN
Contact:

Post by Stucifer_the_maligned »

i don't know much about anime, but tetsuo would have wanted to live! LIIIIIIVE, i say!!!

okay guys, i'm sorry. that was bad. the truth is that we need to be more efficient creatures. i don't want people to go out murdering people, i just don't want people to be packed like sardines by the turn of the next century.
we are born by orbits, molded from spheres, and shaped by lines. there is no such thing as non sequitor.
http://horrendousacts.keenspace.com

User avatar
McDuffies
Bob was here (Moderator)
Bob was here (Moderator)
Posts: 29957
Joined: Fri Jan 01, 1999 4:00 pm
Location: Serbia
Contact:

Post by McDuffies »

*looks at this long thread about stuff*

Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think the discussion has been on level most of the time. No need for mod.
I'm proud of you all.

JexKerome
Cartoon Hero
Posts: 2529
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2004 5:02 pm

Post by JexKerome »

stucifer_the_maligned wrote: i don't want people to go out murdering people, i just don't want people to be packed like sardines by the turn of the next century.
Too late. Read up on the Tokyo subway system to see what I mean.
Faith is what credulity becomes when it finally achieves escape velocity from the constraints of terrestrial discourse- reasonableness, internal coherence, civility, and candor. Thus, the men who commited the atrocities of September 11 were neither cowards nor lunatics of any sort, but Men of Faith- perfect faith- and this, it must finally be acknowleged, is a terrible thing to be.

User avatar
Warren
Cartoon Hero
Posts: 8173
Joined: Mon Jul 01, 2002 3:08 pm
Location: Armadilloland
Contact:

Post by Warren »

stucifer_the_maligned wrote:i just don't want people to be packed like sardines by the turn of the next century.
Not a problem for me, I'd be 130! I'll be dead by then!
Warren
Image
Comics. Drawn poorly.

------------------------------
It's grey, not gray. And it always has been.
Lauren's Wing - The fund for animal care

User avatar
Andronis
Regular Poster
Posts: 80
Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2003 6:00 pm
Location: Alabama
Contact:

Post by Andronis »

mcDuffies wrote:*looks at this long thread about stuff*

Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think the discussion has been on level most of the time. No need for mod.
I'm proud of you all.
The amazing civility during the heavy discussions really shows the wonderful character and integrity of Keenspacers, doesn't it? :D
Image

User avatar
Alaina
Regular Poster
Posts: 511
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2004 4:37 pm
Location: Portland until California
Contact:

Post by Alaina »

wp wrote:
Alaina wrote:
wp wrote: Um... I don't think Taiwan will be doing any attacking anytime soon. But what we *should* do is follow our supposed principles and support democracy (Taiwan) instead of worrying about economic problems. Unfortunately that will never happen.

I think Taiwan will be safe in the meanwhile since:
1) 2008 Olympics in China
2) US wants to have an eye in the Pacific against a potential threat
Pfft...as if the U.S. is really gonna endorse a country just because it's democratic when its opponent offers exports and wealth. Iraq was for the oil, not the prospect of democracy.

Just because Taiwan's not about to attack doesn't mean China is either. They've got just as much to lose.

Anyway, if it happens, I won't know who to root for because I've got relatives in both countries. I guess...Taiwan, because there was this reaaally good shrimp restaurant there. Then again, China's peking duck is amazing.....life is so hard.
You could have just said you agreed with me :lol: Anyway, my point in saying that Taiwan is not about to attack is that the US is almost guaranteed to side with Taiwan if anything gets crazy. Taiwan will most definitely not be the one to initiate an attack if there even is one.
Ahh, okay okay, I agree with you!!! :lol:

Locked