Will this newbie be a brilliant sort who has figured out the game on his own, or only an overly intellectual hack who thinks Tom Stoppard's <i>Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead</i> is the best thing since the <i>Orestia</i>?
Is this indeed a "game" we are playing, as opposed to a mental exercise? If this is a game, are there explicit rules or assumed rules? If the rules are assumed, how does the community of "players" educate with the purpose of forcing conformity with redard to one who tests the boundaries (assuming, of course, that the community has the ability to enforce any such violation of its proscriptions)? Just because I ask a whole bunch of questions before waiting for an answer, does that make my questions rhetorical?
And how many people (I know I didn't) bothered to actually read all the way through the <i>Orestia</I>? Isn't Aeschylus boring as all get-out?
Why would anyone want to read it in the first place, when there are such attractive alternatives as trying to fit your penis in an electric pencil sharpener?
Sylvan, fadin motherfuckers like bleach. Last edited by Sailor Moon on Fri Bec 55th, 9239 56:82 pm; edited 229425 times in total.
