[05/02-2006]

Chaszmyr Mae'Val · Post by **Chaszmyr Mae'Val** » Mon Feb 06, 2006 11:09 am

Indigo Violent wrote:
Gengar003 wrote:Drunk and Bitter Muhammad,
Bitter maybe, drunk definitely not.

More like Can't Get Drunk So Bitter Muhammed

(battens down the hatches against incoming Jihads)

BTW I don't understand the Muhammed thing at all - speaking as a person who isn't offended that the Son of God is portrayed as a pissed, bitter drunkard. Islam - another religion that needs to grow up?

GreenAdder · Post by **GreenAdder** » Mon Feb 06, 2006 12:11 pm

Wait a tick, though. Do Chibis even have "equipment?" You know what I mean. For all we know, just like Hammer, Chibi Sue is chasing after something that she can't possibly have. That'd be the most evil punchline of them all.

Error of Logic · Post by **Error of Logic** » Mon Feb 06, 2006 12:17 pm

Remember when Kiki gave Sue a vibrator so she could 'relieve the pressure', as it were? Sue was initially prepared to use it, until she freaked out over the size. That implies she does have genitalia, so a male chibi probably does as well. ... Sue's neuroses and uncertainties, not to mention some apparently very bad experiences, have sofar stopped her from using hers, though.

Squidflakes · Post by **Squidflakes** » Mon Feb 06, 2006 12:54 pm

I bet male chibi parts are just as rounded and awkward as their hands.

ManaUser · Post by **ManaUser** » Mon Feb 06, 2006 2:16 pm

Error of Logic wrote:Remember when Kiki gave Sue a vibrator so she could 'relieve the pressure', as it were? Sue was initially prepared to use it, until she freaked out over the size. That implies she does have genitalia, so a male chibi probably does as well. ... Sue's neuroses and uncertainties, not to mention some apparently very bad experiences, have sofar stopped her from using hers, though.

And don't forget Lolita-Akiko Sakharov the famous "chibi porn star" of the 70s (noted for her appearance in the banned CHiPs episode). She wouldn't be much of a porn star if she didn't have all the right parts.

Kencf · Post by **Kencf** » Mon Feb 06, 2006 2:35 pm

Presuming that Mohammed need not and should not appear, the strip could still be viewed from his POV a la It Came From Outer Space (1953) or The Message (1976); a prophet's-eye-view, one might say. As for Chibi Sue, thalidomide is used for the treatment of leprosy. She and Gimp Girl could duke it out for the affections of Dr. Vine's patient -the complication being, of course, that Dr. Vine is a demon-possessed pedophile and bigamist. Unclean, unclean!

Error of Logic · Post by **Error of Logic** » Mon Feb 06, 2006 3:00 pm

ManaUser wrote:
Error of Logic wrote:Remember when Kiki gave Sue a vibrator so she could 'relieve the pressure', as it were? Sue was initially prepared to use it, until she freaked out over the size. That implies she does have genitalia, so a male chibi probably does as well. ... Sue's neuroses and uncertainties, not to mention some apparently very bad experiences, have sofar stopped her from using hers, though.
And don't forget Lolita-Akiko Sakharov the famous "chibi porn star" of the 70s (noted for her appearance in the banned CHiPs episode). She wouldn't be much of a porn star if she didn't have all the right parts.

I'd forgotten that one ... Poor Glemph; he can just never seem to win.

Gengar003 · Post by **Gengar003** » Mon Feb 06, 2006 3:14 pm

Chaszmyr Mae'Val wrote:
Indigo Violent wrote:
Gengar003 wrote:Drunk and Bitter Muhammad,
Bitter maybe, drunk definitely not.
More like Can't Get Drunk So Bitter Muhammed

(battens down the hatches against incoming Jihads)

BTW I don't understand the Muhammed thing at all - speaking as a person who isn't offended that the Son of God is portrayed as a pissed, bitter drunkard. Islam - another religion that needs to grow up?

Not so much. One of the tenets of Islam is that you do not portray Muhammad. You do not make pictures of Muhammad or God. That's why the Islamic mosques are all decked out in geometric designs, while the Christian temples go ahead and have Jesus on the cross, and stained glass windows with figures from the bible, and paintings of saints/biblical people.

Portraying Muhammad in the cartoons wasn't just offensive; it was against their religion.

Mind you, they still need to "grow up" in that, as much as they might like it to be, it's not their business what other people do with their saints/prophets/dieties. At least not in Denmark.

Indigo Violent · Post by **Indigo Violent** » Mon Feb 06, 2006 4:01 pm

Well, yeah - but the fact that blasphemy is the "Unforgivable Sin" has not led any Christians to utter death threats against me for saying that their god is a megalomaniacal sociopath. Admittedly, I don't have as good a publicity campaign as this Danish newspaper, but even if I did, my saying so would be unlikely to provoke riots.

Gengar003 · Post by **Gengar003** » Mon Feb 06, 2006 4:30 pm

True. Christian fundamentalists seem to be some combination of less violent and less numerous than their Islamic counterparts. Or perhaps the more violent ones are less numerous...

... has your name ALWAYS been Indigo violent?

Indigo Violent · Post by **Indigo Violent** » Mon Feb 06, 2006 4:45 pm

Gengar003 wrote:True. Christian fundamentalists seem to be some combination of less violent and less numerous than their Islamic counterparts. Or perhaps the more violent ones are less numerous...

I do have to ask myself - if an American citizen travelled to an Islamic country and blew something up, how many would condemn him...and how many would applaud him. Am I too cynical?

... has your name ALWAYS been Indigo violent?

Yep.

Swordsman3003 · Post by **Swordsman3003** » Mon Feb 06, 2006 4:52 pm

The events in the last few weeks over these Danish cartoons reminds how the world is fucking retarded. Yes, all and all, this is the phrase I choose to describe mankind. They are boycotting, harassing people, all kinds of crap. Sooner than later, someone is going to die over this CARTOON.

Kingofthemorlocks · Post by **Kingofthemorlocks** » Mon Feb 06, 2006 5:14 pm

They're not even well-done. They're little more than scribbles depicting Muslims with bombs and guns. One or two has an Islamic gentleman standing on clouds with Yahweh and Buddha in the background, IIRC.

They're doodles of stereotypes.

And now Islamic crazies are perpetuating the stereotypes.

Isn't the world grand?

ManaUser · Post by **ManaUser** » Mon Feb 06, 2006 5:20 pm

swordsman3003 wrote:They are boycotting, harassing people, all kinds of crap. Sooner than later, someone is going to die over this CARTOON.

Sooner.

Kencf · Post by **Kencf** » Mon Feb 06, 2006 7:04 pm

The House of Peace needs to put its house in order; Canadian flags and consulates aren't torched over Ghastly's depictions of Jesus. And in a global hyperreality there'll always be something offensive!

Gengar003 · Post by **Gengar003** » Mon Feb 06, 2006 7:19 pm

Indigo Violent wrote:
Gengar003 wrote:True. Christian fundamentalists seem to be some combination of less violent and less numerous than their Islamic counterparts. Or perhaps the more violent ones are less numerous...
I do have to ask myself - if an American citizen travelled to an Islamic country and blew something up, how many would condemn him...and how many would applaud him. Am I too cynical?

Nope. They'd be applauded my many more than would denounce them, though the ones denouncing would be the ones that keep our country running, and the ones applauding would be the ones from the shallow end of the gene pool.

Indigo Violent wrote:
... has your name ALWAYS been Indigo violent?
Yep.

... and all this time i never bothered to read it and thought it was Indigo Violet. I feel... pity for you for not being known by me and for me for not knowing...

swordsman3003 wrote:[uniportant stuff]the world is fucking retarded. [unimportant stuff]

Yup, hit the nail on the head, there. The world is also fucking too much, if you listen to those overpopulation doomsayers.

Prettydragoon · Post by **Prettydragoon** » Tue Feb 07, 2006 5:23 am

Gengar003 wrote:Not so much. One of the tenets of Islam is that you do not portray Muhammad. You do not make pictures of Muhammad or God.

The Muslims do seem to take the non-prophet status of religious organizations rather more literally than most other faiths.

Gengar003 · Post by **Gengar003** » Tue Feb 07, 2006 5:31 am

... *rimshot*

Moo Cow · Post by **Moo Cow** » Tue Feb 07, 2006 7:41 am

... this is very bad.

blasphemy from people outside of religions does tend to cause a stir, but this is something really major.

I'm scared.

~Sara

Queenhank · Post by **Queenhank** » Tue Feb 07, 2006 10:10 am

For the record: fuck Jesus, that god-damned kike; fuck Mohammed, that turban-wearing, "durka-durka" talkin' terrorist; fuck the future messiah, whomsoever that sodding piece of shit may be; and fuck that crazy-ass drunk Joseph Smith.

You know, while we're at it, fuck Yahweh, Allah, Buddha, Jehovah, Krishna (hell, fuck that whole pantheon), L. Ron Hubbard, and I would even go so far as to say fuck the Flying Spaghetti Monster.

And to all you Agnostic bastards out there: fuck every mother-fucking, child-molesting, two-bit whore of a religion out there, whether or not they may or may not be the "correct" one.

My only god is Abe Vigoda (so please, kill him, not me).