HAHAHAAA!!! WE'RE ALL GONNA DIE!!!

Krikkit · Post by **Krikkit** » Tue Mar 12, 2002 11:49 pm

Question: What might you call the collection of points around which a rotating beetle would spin?
......
.....
....
...
..
.
Answer: An Axis of Weevil!

DOH!

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: krikkit on 2002-03-12 23:50 ]</font>

Whabang · Post by **Whabang** » Wed Mar 13, 2002 12:24 am

On 2002-03-12 23:45, Vazagi wrote:
Ohhh, come on, be fair. America is probably the place with the most atomic weapons in the world, so you gotta give him some credit for wanting to share with the rest of the world

True... Like the saying; Give a man a fish and he will eat for a day, give him an intercontinental ballistic missile loaded with multiple nuclear warheads and he will have all the food for himself tomorrow.

El SillY · Post by **El SillY** » Wed Mar 13, 2002 1:10 am

I tend to think up little plans for smuggling bombs into the white house, they seem more and more attractive every day...

Cypress · Post by **Cypress** » Wed Mar 13, 2002 3:52 am

Just give him a bowl of salted pretzels.

Krikkit · Post by **Krikkit** » Wed Mar 13, 2002 3:55 am

Do you think it would matter if they were buttery pretzels?

JD · Post by JD » Wed Mar 13, 2002 10:48 am

On 2002-03-13 01:10, El SillY wrote:
I tend to think up little plans for smuggling bombs into the white house, they seem more and more attractive every day...

Yay!
Thanks SillY, you just increased the number of hits this forum will get, mostly from the Echelon guys at the NSA. Another gold star for your folder there. Watch that counter spin.

'nuclear' 'assasinate' 'president' 'anthrax' - JD

Paul_Pinewood · Post by **Paul_Pinewood** » Wed Mar 13, 2002 11:58 am

To think the light side of things. Even if things take the worst possible course, we are then going to meet Jack and to hear what he DOES sounds like

Vazagi · Post by **Vazagi** » Wed Mar 13, 2002 12:21 pm

Here is something about the "Axis of evil"

Andrick · Post by **Andrick** » Fri Mar 15, 2002 9:57 am

Nuclear weapons are scare tactics in and of themselves. Nuclear weapons have been used to bring international political clout since Hiroshima/Nagasaki at the bargaining table. Most nuclear weapons in the world is aimed at some target right now. Does it really matter that new targets are assigned to old warheads? To most of us it means exactly dick to our lives, to politicos it is their bread and butter of existence.

As for the 'axis of evil', take that as you would the words of any politician.

ZOMBIE USER 7441 · Post by **ZOMBIE USER 7441** » Fri Mar 15, 2002 4:19 pm

Umm, y'all do realize that, by law, the NSC (National Security Council; president, SecDef, NSA, and Joint Chiefs, IIRC, but don't quote me on that) have to review the US's nuclear weapon contingency plans every year, right? It's far easier to plan for reactions when things are relatively cool than in the heat of the moment, after all.

Also, while the threat of nukes might not have much of a direct deterent value on the nutcases actually carrying out the terror, it does have an effect on the burrocrats (not a misspelling) running the countries supporting the nutcases. No matter what country you're talking about, a burrocrat's primary concern is staying in power, and that's somewhat difficult when your country is threatened with becoming a glass-topped parking lot... even if the threat is only a stated one. Hell, you could even say that the various implications about Bush Jr being stupid (I don't think so, even if I didn't vote for him) work in his favor. "Oh, hell, we'd better behave, or he might accidentally press The Button while playing with it!"

Besides, Bush's threatening to nuke actual countries doing bad things beats out Clinton threatening to nuke the freaking Pacific ocean when he was in office.

Lobo · Post by **Lobo** » Fri Mar 15, 2002 4:47 pm

Yes, but the lists aren't usually 'accidentaly' leaked to the press.

Wait, threatening to nuke countries is better than threatening to nuke the ocean (nuclear testing I presume)? Ignoring the fact that Bush has actually stepped up the tests, how do you figure? If we're concerned about certain countries developing nuclear weapons, I don't see how giving them a really good reason to develop nuclear weapons is at all constructive.

Cypress · Post by **Cypress** » Fri Mar 15, 2002 4:58 pm

http://www.cnn.com/2002/US/03/09/nuclea ... index.html

This might give you a tad bit more info on the situation.

Andrick · Post by **Andrick** » Fri Mar 15, 2002 6:28 pm

The old Soviet military command and the new Russian military command have an interesting policy about nuclear weapons: they are conventional munitions. In other words they would not hesitate to use such weaponry if they'd be more practical than conventional bombs. This "weapon of last resort" business is entirely a western concept. Both Russia and China are leaders in tactical nuclear weapon arsenals and technology whereas nuclear armed NATO countries have been honing their strategic nuclear weapon arsesnals.

I'll also point out development of a weapon is not use of a weapon. For all the nuclear weapons created how many of them were actually used (including tests)? Same goes for biological and chemical weaponry. For all the hype less than 1% of all those weapons have been used since their introduction to warfare in WWs I & II.

JD · Post by JD » Sun Mar 17, 2002 4:30 pm

On 2002-03-15 16:19, Nohbody wrote:
Besides, Bush's threatening to nuke actual countries doing bad things...

I do not even plan to argue this, I'll just throw a couple of questions into the air for people to ponder about:

1) Bad things, according to who exactly?
2) And why isn't Israel on that list then?

Impartial reporting my ass - JD

Kanaeda Kuonji · Post by **Kanaeda Kuonji** » Sun Mar 17, 2002 4:48 pm

No no...send pigs instead...put them on the same planes as people and make it clear what happens if terrorists try to become martyrs with pigs on board!

Cypress · Post by **Cypress** » Sun Mar 17, 2002 5:09 pm

The significance of pigs is...Bleagh?

Foddercat · Post by **Foddercat** » Sun Mar 17, 2002 6:04 pm

Pigs?

Docabsinthe · Post by **Docabsinthe** » Sun Mar 17, 2002 9:37 pm

Of course there is a plan to use nukes on those countries. They have a scenerio to nuke everything in the world. Dosn't mean it will happen. Does mean that theres a bunch of people sitting around thinking about it. Would you be happier if there were no plan at all? My tax dollars at work. Those overpaid bastards. -docabsinthe

Wolven · Post by **Wolven** » Sun Mar 17, 2002 9:52 pm

Why bother, we're all dying from the moment we're born. Hell we absorb an insane number of rads every day(Rads in this case being the measurement for radiation).

So why worry? Life is just a state of mind, so is death. Depending on what you belive neither is all that permanent. But we all gotta die sometime so put me at ground zero.

Thats my 2cents(canadian) and the change back.

Vazagi · Post by **Vazagi** » Sun Mar 17, 2002 10:59 pm

On 2002-03-17 16:48, Kanaeda Kuonji wrote:
No no...send pigs instead...put them on the same planes as people and make it clear what happens if terrorists try to become martyrs with pigs on board!

You might want to read this...