Plot synopsis: 12-19-05

Jaydub · Post by **Jaydub** » Mon Dec 19, 2005 8:56 pm

'nough Said!

Sharuuk · Post by **Sharuuk** » Mon Dec 19, 2005 9:07 pm

AMEN BROTHER!!!!!!!

*'Hi-5's' Jaydub*

S'aaruuk

Sharuuk · Post by **Sharuuk** » Mon Dec 19, 2005 9:12 pm

And as soon as a few libs weigh in on the forum.....my tag line will be oh so true.......we WILL be in a "target rich environment".

Yes....oh YES....I'm evil, twisted and PROUD of it!!!!

S'aaruuk

Maxgoof · Post by **Maxgoof** » Mon Dec 19, 2005 9:17 pm

Heh...I fully expect a few to pop up and say:

"Hah! What do you think of your hero now?? Going around spying on people without a warrant! Huh? What about now? Huh?"

*sigh* They are clueless True Believers.

Kerry Skydancer · Post by **Kerry Skydancer** » Mon Dec 19, 2005 9:32 pm

Tell me about it. From everything I've heard it boils down to the other side wanting us -not- to listen to a known terrorist because he called someone in this country. Riiiight....

Shyal_malkes · Post by **Shyal_malkes** » Mon Dec 19, 2005 9:44 pm

I've always figured that insulting someone was the least effective thing you could do in persuading that person's point of view or even just keeping that person as a friend or fellow citizen.

Jaydub · Post by **Jaydub** » Mon Dec 19, 2005 9:52 pm

Kerry Skydancer Wrote:

Tell me about it. From everything I've heard it boils down to the other side wanting us -not- to listen to a known terrorist because he called someone in this country. Riiiight....

Or someone from this country calling a known terrorist outside this country.

RHJunior · Post by **RHJunior** » Mon Dec 19, 2005 10:00 pm

shyal_malkes wrote:I've always figured that insulting someone was the least effective thing you could do in persuading that person's point of view or even just keeping that person as a friend or fellow citizen.

Shyal, sometimes all you can do with a monkey is throw peanuts at it.

Kerry Skydancer · Post by **Kerry Skydancer** » Mon Dec 19, 2005 10:29 pm

Ayup. One wonders why the left thinks it's appropriate...

LoneWolf23k · Post by **LoneWolf23k** » Tue Dec 20, 2005 3:51 am

Kerry Skydancer wrote:Tell me about it. From everything I've heard it boils down to the other side wanting us -not- to listen to a known terrorist because he called someone in this country. Riiiight....

`

From what I've heard, it boils down to the other side not wanting us to get warrants to listen in on phone conversations between suspected terrorists and their accomplices..

SolidusRaccoon · Post by **SolidusRaccoon** » Tue Dec 20, 2005 5:41 am

Liberal Bashing Time!!!!!!!!!!!

Mike Fang · Post by **Mike Fang** » Tue Dec 20, 2005 7:37 am

Shyal, sometimes all you can do with a monkey is throw peanuts at it.

Heh, isn't that the truth. And another thing about monkeys; sometimes no matter what you do, it's gonna throw it's crap at you.

Liberals are truly factinating creatures. They're the only group I've ever kown who can take offense at being called by their own name.

Maxgoof · Post by **Maxgoof** » Tue Dec 20, 2005 8:12 am

LoneWolf23k wrote:From what I've heard, it boils down to the other side not wanting us to get warrants to listen in on phone conversations between suspected terrorists and their accomplices..

What started this all off was a New York Times article which they had been sitting on for an entire year. Now, why did they sit on it? It's not like the New York Times wouldn't have loved to release this right before the election.

Note how the story has been framed--like Bush was doing this without anyone else knowing about it.

Except the Legislature was kept informed (I wouldn't give two red cents for what Pelosy says went on. It contradicts what other Democrats said went on, and frankly, none of them have a vested interest in telling the truth about the meeting). Also, the Judiciary was kept informed.

See, the problem with written warrants is that they are public documents. They *cannot* be classified. It would take only one person to blow the cover on it without consequence, and at that time, they needed to know, NOW, if any immediate threat was going to follow up 9/11.

The fact that the judiciary was kept informed and they did not object ought to count for something.

But obviously, it doesn't count, according to the New York Times, and the person who wrote the article, who is releasing a book about it this month (No! Really?? What a coincidence!).

Shyal_malkes · Post by **Shyal_malkes** » Tue Dec 20, 2005 8:33 am

RHJunior wrote:Shyal, sometimes all you can do with a monkey is throw peanuts at it.

I'm not saying that I don't get fed up with liberasl and democrats and just wanna do something mean and terrible every now and again. all I'm saying is that it's probably better not to stoop to their level. all throughout the 2004 champaign all I heard from the left was "lets hate bush together" all I heard from the right was "we've got a job to do, this is what it is and here's how I plan to do it." more then that WAS said but that's all I heard. considering that it makes sense I voted the way I did.

I don't think that any good political figure is one that is so closed minded as to be totally and completely absorbed in their own opinions. it is unfortunate but being the synical and fault pointing lot we are and also being fierce to defend anyone similar to us when they get attacked we end with the result of pointing out the faults of everyone different and then rebidly defend those that are like us that get attacked.

imo, a vicious cycle of division. the same (or at least similar to) the division (again imo) that caused the civil war within the US.

as far as monkeys are concerned, if you're going to go throwing peanuts at it why not do something even more effective and eat the peanuts yourself and just let that monkey starve?

Sharuuk · Post by **Sharuuk** » Tue Dec 20, 2005 8:40 am

I have become SO INFURIATED with the NYT over the constant attempts to undermine this administration and frustrate the war effort...

..Dear GOD is there ANY way these subversive bastards could be hauled before the courts on charges of sedetion at the very least???

Yeah, yeah, yeah.....I know....1st Amendment rights and all that....BUT.....with every right comes the responsibility to excersize that right in a responsible manner. I have the right to own and carry a gun, but if I walk out into the street waving it around and scaring people with it.......there are consequences.....unpleasant consequences that I'll end up facing.

Why in the Name of God can't these people be held to the same basic standards? They are driven totally by their hatred of GWB, want to discredit his administration and don't care how much risk and/or danger their efforts put the rest of this country in!

I'm at a complete loss......short of hunting down and asassinating the editors and some of the reporters......which in all honesty sounds pretty good to me at times.......how can these arrogant bastards be brought to accountability?

S'aaruuk

Labrusca · Post by **Labrusca** » Tue Dec 20, 2005 9:13 am

Sharuuk wrote:I'm at a complete loss......short of hunting down and asassinating the editors and some of the reporters......which in all honesty sounds pretty good to me at times.......how can these arrogant bastards be brought to accountability?

S'aaruuk

Given how many layoffs and how much of a drop in advertising revenue the NY Times has been reporting, I'd say a lot of people feel the same way. Boycott the paper's advertisers and let them KNOW why you are boycotting them. That hits the paper where they live.

GreyBlade · Post by **GreyBlade** » Tue Dec 20, 2005 9:15 am

I was waiting for a plot script like that to turn up.

Time to watch the steriotyping roll. ^_^
(At least I can still laugh at the die-hard idiots on both sides, instead of taking offense...)

Mopman · Post by **Mopman** » Tue Dec 20, 2005 11:52 am

To be a Christian is to follow the teachings of Christ.

Turn the other cheek , forgive our enemies.

And not allow fear to turn us away from the path of rightiousness.

We are allowed to defend ourselves but if we hate those that oppose us then we are allowing ourselves to drawn into the camp of the deciever.

Judge not lest ye be judged none of us can stand before God for another nor may another stand for us.

Remember the other person is still your brother in Christ even if he does not accept him.

Pray for him to find God and for God to forgive us all.

Merry Christmas

Mike Fang · Post by **Mike Fang** » Tue Dec 20, 2005 12:43 pm

Remember the other person is still your brother in Christ even if he does not accept him.

Funny I don't remember hearing that in The Bible. I do know there's a passage that says that all a person needs to do is accept God (even if he doesn't accept Jesus) and be penitent for his sins, though. Maybe that's what you're referring to. In that case I agree.

We are allowed to defend ourselves but if we hate those that oppose us then we are allowing ourselves to drawn into the camp of the deciever.

Again, not something I recall hearing. Now I can forgive personal attacks (though I do ban folks from posting on my LJ for basing their arguments against me on personal insults because it's apparent they aren't interrested in discussion, but in attacking me personally). But when somebody upholds something that I think is morally wrong, I lose all respect for them.

Mopman · Post by **Mopman** » Tue Dec 20, 2005 1:53 pm

You have heard that it was said, "Love your neighbor and hate your enemy."
But I tell you: Love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you (Matthew 5:43-44).

Comic Genesis Forums

Plot synopsis: 12-19-05

Plot synopsis: 12-19-05

To be a christian

Scripture