CHOOOM!!
All the more reason to just make an improbability drive, and just skip all that mucking around with lightspeed vehicles and whatnot.BlasTech wrote: meaning at some point in time (in more hitchiker terms) some schmuck is going to figure out a way to supercharge his little spaceship and then collapse us all the way back to the beginning of time again:D
To every night there shall come a day; even forever has to come to an end.... I think ~ Kato
-
Wayfarer
- Regular Poster
- Posts: 776
- Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2005 8:15 pm
- Location: Lantern Waste
- Contact:
Okay, yep. That last good science class was high school chemistry.Kerry Skydancer wrote: High school chemistry pretty much teaches that mass is constant.
Okay, that makes sense. I can see it now.Kerry Skydancer wrote:In the more precise versions of chemistry and physics, however, mass-energy is the conserved quantity...
Hmmmm... I think the forums are weird enough for me.Kerry Skydancer wrote:Now if you want things to get really weird, you have to start taking the changes in perceived duration into account under intense gravitational fields (aka intensely deformed spacetime) or high relative speeds. This can even lead different observers (which means observers moving at different velocities) to disagree on the order of observed events.
No, actually, that's intriguing... but way over my head. (Last good science class being high school chemistry and all.
)Thanks for the explanation.
“The mirror may tell us what we are; memory may tell us what we were; but only the imagination can tell us what we might be.” – Donald Keesey
“You go whistling in the dark/ Making light of it/ Making light of it/ And I follow with my heart/ Laughing all the way// Oh 'cause you move me/ You get me dancing and you make me sing/ You move me/ Now I'm taking delight/ In every little thing/ How you move me”
~ "You Move Me"
Pierce Pettis, Gordon Kennedy
“You go whistling in the dark/ Making light of it/ Making light of it/ And I follow with my heart/ Laughing all the way// Oh 'cause you move me/ You get me dancing and you make me sing/ You move me/ Now I'm taking delight/ In every little thing/ How you move me”
~ "You Move Me"
Pierce Pettis, Gordon Kennedy
-
BlasTech
- Cartoon Hero
- Posts: 1439
- Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2005 7:52 pm
- Location: In a small tower on the southern side of the college
Just gotta love relativity. 
Umm, ill try to recount an example of this Wayfarer lemme see if i can remember how it went:
the main part of relativity comes from the statement that the speed of light is constant in all frames of reference. that means that if i see light, it moves at the speed of light no matter how fast i am moving myself.
Imagine a train moving at relativistic speeds (say ... 0.8C), there's a guard at one end, and the driver at the other. in the middle, there is someone with a lamp. when the driver or the guard sees the lamp turn on, they wave at the lampholder.
-= In the frame of reference of the lampholder.=-
He turns on the lamp, light goes out at C and the driver and guard see it simultaniously, they both wave at the same time, and he sees them wave at the same time.
-= In the frame of reference of a person standing by the side of the rail as the train goes past =-
He sees the light turn on, but he sees the light move at C while the train moves in one direction at 0.8C. As a result he sees the light "racing" with the train. To him, it would seem as if the guard at the end sees the light first and waves first and that the driver sees it later and waves second.
Finally, put all these people in a room together and ask the question "who waved first" and you'll get some interesting answers.
Umm, ill try to recount an example of this Wayfarer lemme see if i can remember how it went:the main part of relativity comes from the statement that the speed of light is constant in all frames of reference. that means that if i see light, it moves at the speed of light no matter how fast i am moving myself.
Imagine a train moving at relativistic speeds (say ... 0.8C), there's a guard at one end, and the driver at the other. in the middle, there is someone with a lamp. when the driver or the guard sees the lamp turn on, they wave at the lampholder.
-= In the frame of reference of the lampholder.=-
He turns on the lamp, light goes out at C and the driver and guard see it simultaniously, they both wave at the same time, and he sees them wave at the same time.
-= In the frame of reference of a person standing by the side of the rail as the train goes past =-
He sees the light turn on, but he sees the light move at C while the train moves in one direction at 0.8C. As a result he sees the light "racing" with the train. To him, it would seem as if the guard at the end sees the light first and waves first and that the driver sees it later and waves second.
Finally, put all these people in a room together and ask the question "who waved first" and you'll get some interesting answers.
The comment about light exceeding its own speed limit is actually a very valid one. The maximum speed for anything that we know of is the speed of light in space, which is termed C. However, when traveling through a medium other than space light moves considerably slower. Objects can exceed the speed of light in a medium other than a vaccume, resulting in Cerenov radiation (no clue if I'm spelling that right). That's actually the basis on which most neutrino detectors are built... detecing those blue flashes of Cerenov radiation can allow you to narrow down roughly where a neutrino was coming from, as the light expands out in a cone pointing in the direction that the particle was going... similar to how a sonic boom travels the same direction as the plane that made it.