Random posts

Charlesbrubaker · Post by **Charlesbrubaker** » Thu Mar 31, 2005 7:19 pm

I edited this to make it fit in with the posts.

Better than locking it.

TheSuburbanLetdown · Post by **TheSuburbanLetdown** » Thu Mar 31, 2005 7:25 pm

There's already a topic for this.

Charlesbrubaker · Post by **Charlesbrubaker** » Thu Mar 31, 2005 7:31 pm

Oops. That's weird. I was looking through the forum to see if there was any on Teri but didn;t/

^%&$-ing stupid browser cache.

Will the mods merge this?

TheSuburbanLetdown · Post by **TheSuburbanLetdown** » Thu Mar 31, 2005 7:33 pm

McDuffies'll probably just lock it.

Don't worry about it; no harm done.

Charlesbrubaker · Post by **Charlesbrubaker** » Thu Mar 31, 2005 7:44 pm

out of curiosity, can't they just delete this post? (I hope so)

TheSuburbanLetdown · Post by **TheSuburbanLetdown** » Thu Mar 31, 2005 7:50 pm

I'm not sure. I don't think I've ever seen a post get deleted. I don't know too much about mod abilites.

Nyke · Post by **Nyke** » Thu Mar 31, 2005 8:27 pm

No, it shall not get deleted, it shall not get locked, it shall be a standing display of your shame!

SHAME!

Toxic · Post by **Toxic** » Thu Mar 31, 2005 8:45 pm

How dare you remove this thread's feeding tube...er...lock it! This thread deserves the right to live like all other threads, even if it is about an existing thread!

Cope · Post by **Cope** » Thu Mar 31, 2005 10:03 pm

Apparently, deleting threads is processor-intensive or something. Locking is probably just easier.

Charlesbrubaker · Post by **Charlesbrubaker** » Thu Mar 31, 2005 11:02 pm

what about merging topics? or is that processor-intensive too

Chibiartstudios · Post by **Chibiartstudios** » Thu Mar 31, 2005 11:02 pm

(in before the lock!)

Indeed, to delete this thread would be like killing it. It's best to lock it and let it slowly decend into the fiery pit of hell. It's what the thread wanted.

Yeahduff · Post by **Yeahduff** » Fri Apr 01, 2005 2:10 am

C'mon. There's no chance for this thread to get back on topic. It's time to let it go.

Actually, who're we kidding. This will go on for pages with people making inane comment after inane comment until we all bore of it.

Perhaps we shouldn't be asking questions about the affairs of moderators........

Rkolter · Post by **Rkolter** » Fri Apr 01, 2005 4:46 am

The moderators are having affairs?

JPSloan · Post by **JPSloan** » Fri Apr 01, 2005 5:35 am

Meddle not in the affairs of moderators, for they are subtle and quick to anger!

Charlesbrubaker · Post by **Charlesbrubaker** » Fri Apr 01, 2005 7:43 am

chibiartstudios wrote:Indeed, to delete this thread would be like killing it.

I know. That's the point.

I just edited the subject line. WAY better than having a thread locked.

We can do Malaprompt thing, where we post random things, that somehow connects to the previous post.

Corgan_dane · Post by **Corgan_dane** » Fri Apr 01, 2005 8:38 am

This comment is inane, and I'm damn proud.

Nyke · Post by **Nyke** » Fri Apr 01, 2005 8:45 am

Fuck you! Fuck you all!

Rkolter · Post by **Rkolter** » Fri Apr 01, 2005 8:52 am

That wasn't an egg sir.

It wasn't?

No, sir.

Well... what was it then?

It was a game ball sir. I believe they call them "wiffle" balls.

That would explain the odd texture.

Indeed sir.

So you're sure it wasn't an egg.

Yes sir.

I'll be needing some laxatives then.

Very good sir.

Warren · Post by **Warren** » Fri Apr 01, 2005 2:36 pm

Can I get some Wendy's "finger" chili?

Sput · Post by **Sput** » Fri Apr 01, 2005 2:38 pm

I demand homage in the form of a giant peep that is equivalent to my weight !