Now people, I don't mind if you guys agree with him or not, but seriously...he is the only guy who mentions this. A lot of other people tell me that I have one of the best intros for a webcomic, probably due to the lack of "OMG LETS START A COMIC" or "HI, My name is Dickpenis and this my friend who players games all day, Winnie the Pooh" or it isn't sprite.The art is rather good but the flow of action is often difficult to follow and confusing. The dialogue is also difficult to read at times both due to font/size choices, as well as your silly placement and flow of text. You're panels do not seem to be organized with thought to text as is shown by the vast number of ridiculous splts in text that serve only to annoy the reader. Your story is also not that great or intruiging. The beginning is ridiculous. heres how it comes across
some clumsy elf figure walking, oh look a bear, oh but the elf can stare down the bear bravo, oh now its a few days later for some reason and someone is jumping down a tree in what looks like it's meant to be a graceful fashion but the sound effects being so large state otherwise. And now all of a sudden we are at some gladiator match where some presumeabley scottish guy and snooty lizard are having a boring discussion.
Good art does not ever make up for bad writing, and good art does not make up for bad story and action progression.
Thanks for leeching an artist. This won't help his resume or his career.
But, in a nutshell, do you disagree or agree with this guy? Was my writing *that* bad or is it above expectation from a guy who never wrote a comic before ? TELL ME.
Or make fun of the guy. Whatever. I need a beer.







