Chick-Boy and Freddy!

Squidflakes · Post by **Squidflakes** » Tue Jul 06, 2004 9:13 am

C'mon Honor, don't sell yourself short. Who better as ask for cunilingus advice than a lesbian?

CJBurgandy · Post by **CJBurgandy** » Tue Jul 06, 2004 11:15 am

you know Honor, you're a bevy of knowledge. This is one reason I love dating older women... they can teach you things.

Halo299 · Post by **Halo299** » Tue Jul 06, 2004 2:25 pm

Honor, i think you just changed my life.

Thank you.

H-Kat · Post by **H-Kat** » Tue Jul 06, 2004 2:40 pm

I'm impressed.

-Kitty

Maximuscoolman · Post by **Maximuscoolman** » Tue Jul 06, 2004 3:44 pm

happypeepeehead wrote:Dunno why. Small crotches come on all people of different heights.

I don't see the point behind large penis bragging for some people and for the sake of this thread, this is probably a major reason why panties feel fine on me.

Man, I'm jealous, I can barely wear men's underwear without my penis pushing it's way out let alone women's, but that's probably because It's erect so much of the time rather than that it's big.

cjburgandy wrote:yeah, I use to argue with co-workers at my old job that my penis was the largest in customer service. The told me it didn't count if it was plastic and store bought... Told me I was the rubber display Sasuage at the Butcher store of their masculinity... (Oh, I was the only girl at customer service at that point in time)

It doesn't look good on them to say that it doesn't count if it's artificial, they are almost admitting that they would be beaten by the artificial version if it did count. My real one is more or less the exact same size as my artificial one (there's no way I'd have bought one bigger, there's something terribly freudian about that) which is 7 inches. I can take all of that, but as a man, I don't feel it would benefit me to take more than 7 inches, it seems enough to pleasure everything I want it to. But this is the question I put to you, what is the ideal size for a penis - artifical or otherwise?

CJBurgandy · Post by **CJBurgandy** » Tue Jul 06, 2004 4:24 pm

depends on the girl. Some girls are actually more pleasured by width not length. The only thing inside that's getting any action is that g-spot and only if the guy/gal is hitting it. Besides that, the opening is more sensitive than the rest of the canal.

Delthir · Post by **Delthir** » Tue Jul 06, 2004 4:37 pm

cjburgandy wrote:depends on the girl. Some girls are actually more pleasured by width not length. The only thing inside that's getting any action is that g-spot and only if the guy/gal is hitting it. Besides that, the opening is more sensitive than the rest of the canal.

That sort of makes it a cruel joke, since isn't it the entire penis that is sensitive for guys? So sitting all the way in, and just grinding around the opening would probably work the best?

Toawa · Post by **Toawa** » Tue Jul 06, 2004 4:42 pm

I suppose it may depend, but most of the nerve endings involved with the process are located in the head, so it's actually fairly concentrated for us, too. There is some controvery over how many are in the foreskin; I've heard "little", I've heard "lots".

Steel Roses · Post by **Steel Roses** » Wed Jul 07, 2004 1:24 am

if you wana hear another cruel joke that evolution has played on most men.... nearly all of the nerves in the penis are located quite deep inside... think of a huge stack of paper rolled into a tube.... only the outer layer is gettin' any..... the rest is just sad that it isn't... [each page of the paper being a layer of nerves....and the center that you can't roll the pages into being that huge blood supply]...which is why certain piercings are actually a bit more common now... more aggitatable area i guess... or so i hear

and as far as the foreskin goes.. i've heard 'little sensation' more often from those who have it... and tons of sensation from those who don't... so i'd trust those who are with it to experiment... but i can't speak from experience..... so take it for what you will

Toawa · Post by **Toawa** » Wed Jul 07, 2004 6:08 am

Damnation! I always knew there was something like that, I just never had proof.

Yet another reason to add to the list of "Why the Female Body Structure is Superior to the Male Body Structure."

Ghastly · Post by **Ghastly** » Wed Jul 07, 2004 7:32 am

The foreskin itself doesn't have much in the way of nerve endings and isn't really anymore sensitive than the skin anywhere else on the body. The advantage of the foreskin as far as sensitivity is concerned is it makes the glans much more sensitive.

Squidflakes · Post by **Squidflakes** » Wed Jul 07, 2004 8:01 am

I've heard that's one of those things that defies description. Kind of like asking an octopus what having 8 arms is like.
If there is a perfect use for virtual reality, or implanted computers that can alter your personal reality for short periods of time, I think that's it.

I call it... The Circumsimulator.
If you've got the fore, you can experience sex with a naked glans.
If you're foreless, you can try the tender rubbings of a little extra skin.

I tell ya, it would bring world peace.

My next idea...

The Vag-O-Matic
Men, ever wanted the thrill of up to three different types of orgasms? Want to know exactly they say that teeth, rings, and wrist watches hurt?
Now you'll know! Give the gift of understanding to that special woman in your life today! Avalable with Crampmaster add-on. Get to know the real reason for chocolate, romance novels, and Livejournal.

And for the ladies

The Penizer!
*Know* the pleasure of porn and chicken! *Feel* the pain of blue-balls and zippers. *Wonder* at how freaking in the way that thing can get. *Understand* why we just gotta stick that thing in stuff... even if it's just metaphoric!

Honor · Post by **Honor** » Wed Jul 07, 2004 9:25 am

*grins and the chuckles softly*

Sign me up.

Delthir · Post by **Delthir** » Wed Jul 07, 2004 9:47 am

I know it isn't the rule for everyone, but "according to scientists" (Damn you Scientific Eroticans!) men reach their sexual peak at about 18-20, and women reach it at 40. So women with experience "under their belt" have all the fun, while guys who are just fumbling around for the first time have all their fun.

CJBurgandy · Post by **CJBurgandy** » Wed Jul 07, 2004 11:26 am

they call it the "Al Bundy" Effect

Maximuscoolman · Post by **Maximuscoolman** » Wed Jul 07, 2004 4:36 pm

Delthir wrote:I know it isn't the rule for everyone, but "according to scientists" (Damn you Scientific Eroticans!) men reach their sexual peak at about 18-20, and women reach it at 40. So women with experience "under their belt" have all the fun, while guys who are just fumbling around for the first time have all their fun.

I'm not sure if this is related, but loads of the girls I know are going out with older guys, but all of the guys I know just want to go out with girls their own age, and can't because they are all going out with older guys.
This is something I don't undersand, I mean, I remember my Mom telling my sister than she should find a guy about 10 years older than her, I mean, what kind of advice is that?! and someone i used to be frieds with told me her Mom told her a similar thing, I just can't comprehend it at all...

The way I see it, having a foreskin can only be an advantage. I assume that if you don't have a foreskin, the end of the penis will become desensitised and you wont feel as much in it. Having a foreskin to protect the end, will leave it raw an sensitive, and when it does get stimulation, it will be a lot more effective. Not to mention, the foreskin is important in masturbation; I don't know how I'd do it without one, it just litterally wouldn't be pulling the hood. Also, the word foreskin sets up that many crude jokes, i trust you have all seen that rainbow episode where george is peeling a banana "one skin, two skin, three skin, four-" and the other day a radion station was giving away four drum skins.
In short, I <3 my foreskin.

Goddessmisca · Post by **Goddessmisca** » Wed Jul 07, 2004 6:22 pm

maximuscoolman wrote: But this is the question I put to you, what is the ideal size for a penis - artifical or otherwise?

Okay, I'll spill. I like about 5.5 -6 in, with a nice banana curve. Seriously, the curve is most importiant to me, if your cock is perfectly straight, it just won't be as fun.

Delthir · Post by **Delthir** » Wed Jul 07, 2004 8:49 pm

Goddessmisca wrote:
maximuscoolman wrote: But this is the question I put to you, what is the ideal size for a penis - artifical or otherwise?
Okay, I'll spill. I like about 5.5 -6 in, with a nice banana curve. Seriously, the curve is most importiant to me, if your cock is perfectly straight, it just won't be as fun.

Well, then I'm not for you. I fall a little short of that.

Squidflakes · Post by **Squidflakes** » Thu Jul 08, 2004 6:43 am

Goddessmisca wrote:
maximuscoolman wrote: But this is the question I put to you, what is the ideal size for a penis - artifical or otherwise?
Okay, I'll spill. I like about 5.5 -6 in, with a nice banana curve. Seriously, the curve is most importiant to me, if your cock is perfectly straight, it just won't be as fun.

YES! Have I got a penis for you!

CJBurgandy · Post by **CJBurgandy** » Thu Jul 08, 2004 10:25 am

and I have fingers that curl quite nicely

Comic Genesis Forums

Chick-Boy and Freddy!

Cruel joke revisited

Re: Cruel joke revisited