A defense that all can be proud of.

Skizotoro · Post by **Skizotoro** » Tue Mar 02, 2004 7:53 pm

http://www.sky.com/skynews/article/0,,3 ... 53,00.html

But Tatam's counsel denied he was a paedophile, pointing to the fact that the child porn pictures were only a small fraction of his total collection of between 10 and 20 million images

pedophilia is usually an unforgivable crime to me. But god damn, with a defense like that I just have to respect the guy.

Inky · Post by **Inky** » Tue Mar 02, 2004 8:00 pm

"And there's hardly any rat in it!"

Happypeepeehead · Post by **Happypeepeehead** » Wed Mar 03, 2004 3:46 am

Maybe I don't understand British law, but how could his girlfriend be uncharged if he had hard copy printouts on a nightstand they shared? Well, the main lead was the credit card info, but still, in the US, I believe they'd get her too for being an accessory.

Then again, that's the Sky News. I didn't expect the whole of it.