Religion and Morality

ZOMBIE USER 12759
Regular Poster
Posts: 53
Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 2:26 am

Post by ZOMBIE USER 12759 »

I hate to say it, but I sincerely doubt that anyone wil buy a "crippled" nanotech system, when I'm sure much more capable ones will be available on the black market. You can't stop misuse of any technology, no matter what purpose it was created for. (Look at jetliners! :cry: ) Unfortunantly, you can't stop the development of new technology either. It's pretty proven that you can't kill ideas, even if they are bad ones. I think people had better forget about stopping the misuses of Nanotech by force, and start considering ways to stop people from wanting to misuse the technology. (as well as preparing for the worst, since I think it will come :( )

User avatar
Drooling Fan Girl
Regular Poster
Posts: 533
Joined: Fri Jan 01, 1999 4:00 pm

Post by Drooling Fan Girl »

OK, I tried to read the whole thread, and now I will step up to the plate and say what I think/ have reasoned/ believe. This is striped down to the bare bones mind you.

Religion is a social tool used to organize, socialize, etc. large groups of people.

Spirituality is an individual's realationship with her concept of what god is or is not.

Take Care
DFG

User avatar
Calbeck
Regular Poster
Posts: 595
Joined: Fri Jan 01, 1999 4:00 pm
Location: The Land of AZ
Contact:

Post by Calbeck »

Noa wrote:Calbeck,
Hate to say it but your entire arguement seems to boil down to "God has to be around so he can add 'teeth' to morality."
Nope. M'point is that there IS no effective morality without an Ultimate Authority to which one will --- not just can --- be held accountable at some point.

It doesn't matter, to my point, whether we're talking about God, Buddha, or any of the given Hindu or Japanese god-forms.

On the other hand, your own basic argument seems to boil down to the idea that morality can reasonably be said to spring from "enlightened self-interest" --- neglecting to note that individual ideals of self-interest differ from person to person. Another definition of acting solely in regards for one's own personal self-interest is "greed", while another is "selfishness".

Certainly, it can have long-term bad effects on a person if they are greedy or selfish --- but look at all the selfish, greedy people throughout history who never got a comeuppance of any sort. Stalin, for example, lived a long and prosperous life with many comforts and riches atop the slag pile of death and destruction his regime created.

Which is waaaaay off the topic. Madcat asked me how an atheist could come to a solid moral code to follow, and I was giving one of several philosophical answers (as provided by noted philosopher and atheist Hobbes)
And I pointed out the obvious problem with the ideals set forth by Hobbes and yourself. Which is directly following the topic.
There IS something to "hold you to it": it's called society.
At which point it must be noted that living outside the "norms of society", or even rising to control society in order to prevent its norms from applying to oneself, are entirely open routes. Society is not, in and of itself, a true controlling factor, only a suggestive one.
As to the point of "well if I don't get caught, it's alright." I can show you several societies composed of people who thought that very thing: they're called "prisons."
Likewise, prison is empty of all those who were never caught. As for being caught, prison is hardly a deterrent any more: most career criminals actually consider a tour "in stir" something to brag about, and many criminals continue to conduct themselves criminally while IN prison.
Now, to the point that "without God, people will do what they want."
Ah, I see...you've missed my point entirely. Particularly since you're quoting words I never said.

What I said is that God provides the promise of eventual justice. It is not a matter of preventing people from doing any given thing, but rather of giving them fair warning that one day there will be a comeuppance for evil they commit.

Free will exists whether or not there is a God.
Outside of myself, well... I have no real affectual way to alter that on my own. It takes a lot to get an entire population to go along with the idea of morality... which is why I'm an unusual atheist who thinks religion is a pretty good thing for the most part. I didn't always think this way, but then again, life is about change and growth, so hopefully, I'm doing something right here. Someday, I hope that people will gain the wisdom to live good lives for their own sake, but I think we have a way to go on that one... I'll even state the obvious and say it probably won't happen in the foreseeable future, but I can dream can't I?
Noa
Well, it's certainly better than John Lennon's "Imagine". -;>

RHJunior
Cartoon Hero
Posts: 1689
Joined: Fri Jan 01, 1999 4:00 pm
Location: WV
Contact:

John Lennon's "Imagine"

Post by RHJunior »

... interesting how John Lennon's Imagine went.

He wrote "Imagine no posessions"-- at a time he lived in a mansion and sat atop millions of dollars in swag he got from selling records.

He wrote about imagining no hell below, and no heaven above... at the same time he was chucking said money at Indian gurus.

He "Imagined" people with no God, no heaven, no posessions and no rights "living in harmony"--- and never you mind that communist China was and still is filled with millions of wretches living with just that.

Communists generally "imagine" all sorts of things-- for *other* people to live with, and at someone else's expense.
"What was that popping noise ?"
"A paradigm shifting without a clutch."
--Dilbert

ZOMBIE USER 12886
Regular Poster
Posts: 46
Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 2:26 am

It's not what you think.

Post by ZOMBIE USER 12886 »

Okay, third time's the charm. I hope.

I've been trying to delurk on this forum with little luck. I think it has something to do with pushing the wrong button. But I'm here now, so I might as well share my two cents.

I think many of you are making a mistake. Bickering back and forth about whether God invented morality or not. It's pointless really. If He did, then He did; if not, then He didn't. It mostly boils down to whether or not He exists. I for one believe He does, if only because I can't imagine how anyone can look at the beautiful universe we have and think it's an accident (viva la Bloom County). The idea is inconceivable to me. Well, almost.

Look, before you argue anything you need to answer one question: is there a God? So many people disregard this question as if it has no significance (sp?), yet in reality the answer to it affects everything. You cannot make an effective argument without first answering it.

Let's consider the athiest perspective (apologies for generalizing; it makes for an easier argument, i.e. I'm lazy). Now, most athiests assume there is no God. Good for them; they've already answered the question. Now they can make arguments stating things that are likely to make many theists hopping mad. Yet, as long as God doesn't exist, their arguments may very well hold up.

Thiests, on the other hand, believe there is a God, though not always in the traditional Judeo-Christian or Islamic sense (e.g. New Age, cults, Buddhism, etc.). They tend to make arguments that their God created things, and that He (or She) holds the answers to all of life's questions. The thing is, many of their arguments make sense, even to the point that some athiests are converted, or at least begin to wonder. And if God exists, those arguments may be the only way to save people from eternal damnation, whatever form that may take.

But in the end, no amount of arguing can change a person's mind. The so-called "Christians" on this forum aren't doing their job. God says to preach the Good News everywhere at all times. All I hear is a bunch of wishy-washy ideas that are <i>not</i> of God.

Let me make this clear: I'm a Jesus Freak, and I will shout the Gospel from the rooftops if I have to. I believe in Jesus because twelve disciples don't make an army (and they probably wouldn't have had that many). You can argue 'til you're blue in the face, but you can't change my mind. And I can't change yours either. Until the heart changes, the mind remains unshaken. That's the way it is.

You can think me divisive, that's okay. Jesus brought a sword, not peace. If you're not saved, you are headed to hell. It's a fact, whether you believe it or not. Got a problem with that? Read my sig.

Maybe this isn't the place to do this, but I encourage all those reading to repent of their sins and ask Jesus to come into their hearts right now. You don't have to accept; it's an invitation, not a draft. You have a choice between God and sin, but do know that the choice you make has eternal consequences. You can't escape it; judgement is coming, and men shall have no excuse for what they've done. :roll: And no, ladies, that doesn't mean you're exempt.

Don't anyone tell me to calm down. I know what I believe, and I know what God wants me to do. Kick me off the forum if you want, but you can't shut me up forever. Online aliases can be changed quite easily.

By the way, Calbeck, maybe we did screw up the Bible. But if that's so, than why do our current translations match the Dead Sea Scrolls so well? Even if the council of Nicea had no right to mess with God's Word, He has used that "screwed-up" version to save countless souls. How can you suggest it's not the way it's supposed to be? After all, there are no coincidences when it comes to God.

I'm okay now; my blood pressure's back to normal. And the only one I'll answer to is either God or Ralph, so don't anyone try to tell me to shut up. I've been silent for too long anyway.

Keep the faith brothers and sisters,

-Strange Wulf

ZOMBIE USER 12759
Regular Poster
Posts: 53
Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 2:26 am

Post by ZOMBIE USER 12759 »

I wouldn't worrk about being kicked off of the forum. I've never seen that happen. I kind of agree with you actually, clearly the answer to this debate (and most things actually) hinges on wheter or not there is a God. Also, people who believe in God should consider it their duty to at least try and convince others to feel the same way. HOWEVER, coming out and saying: "Blah blah blah, believe this or go to Hell." isn't going to change anybody's mind. If you really want to convert people, you've got to at least open a dialogue with them first. I'd like to think some of us here have been doing our "jobs" a you put it here in that sense. You can't scare people into faith, (I assure you, Hell is the last thing Atheists worry about) but sometimes you can make them think, and God willing, they will come to the same conclusion as you at some point. People who had no faith and aquired it by reflection tend to be quite strong in their beliefs, unlike someone who is essentially held hostage by Pascale's wager. Also, scaring people isn't going to make anyone happy, and nobody who isn't happy is going to be converted. Oh, and I happen to disagreee with you GREATLY on one point at least: What makes you think that those who do not believe in God will surely go to Hell? That punisment is literally worse than death, worse than anything imaginable. At the same time, there are those in the world who have never been exposed to Christianity (or worse yet, were exposed to it by some megalomaniac who turned them off to it forever) If those people go to Hell, than God is unjust. I know God isn't unjust, how about you? Oh, and I happen to like the council of Nicea. So BOOYAH! :)

Kinsfire
Regular Poster
Posts: 26
Joined: Fri Jan 01, 1999 4:00 pm
Location: Roselle, NJ USA
Contact:

Post by Kinsfire »

Why do so many Christians consider the fright tactic to be a valid one?

"If you don't accept Jesus as your Savior, you're going to Hell."

I won't go into (again) my problems with the concept of hell (if you're curious, ask me off-list at kinsfire@kinsfire.net), but fear of it should not be the main selling point.

Let's not forget what some would consider the sin of pride. "I'm going to heaven and you're not!" Think about it - what you're basically doing is bragging about the certainty of something, and lording it over others.

The Christians I listen to more are the ones who actually make an effort to live the life. Besides, who says witnessing is only a verbal thing?

As for myself, I've made peace with the Christian God after having been seriously traumatized by some of his more rabid followers. I've become more of what might be considered a Gnostic Christian, although I'd honestly argue the use of the word Christian, due to the connotations it carries to a lot of people. (It assumes things about my beliefs that simply are not true.) I'm of the mind that my belief system is correct for me. Threats to my eternal soul are less than effective, unless you WANT me to tune out what you're saying. God and I will have our say when we eventually meet, and I don't doubt that she'll have a lot to say to me. Until then, I'm going to live my life.

By the way, as for a moral code by it's very existence coming from God - I'd argue that. I know a few atheists who look at no stealing from the following viewpoint - "It's wrong to steal because it's someone else's property." No deity invocation, no worries about getting caught, just a simple feeling that taking something away from someone without that other willingly giving up the thing in question is wrong.

Enough rambling from me.

Kinsfire

ZOMBIE USER 12293
Newbie
Posts: 23
Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 2:26 am

Post by ZOMBIE USER 12293 »

Calbeck,

I was going to suggest we do a "point by point" arguement (after apologizing for putting words in your mouth, of course) but I think I better address Strange_Wulf first. Hope you don't mind.

"You can think me divisive, that's okay. Jesus brought a sword, not peace. If you're not saved, you are headed to hell. It's a fact, whether you believe it or not. Got a problem with that? Read my sig."

(No, I haven't any idea how to get quotes into the little box... any assistance would be greatly appreciated)

Sorry, I fail to see how your sig makes my going to hell a fact.

For those curious, Madcat hit it on the head: Hell is not on my list of priorities. I don't believe in hell, and as an atheist, why would I? This would be like saying "I don't believe in Santa Claus, but I do believe in flying riendeer." They are part of the same mythos/story. But, as a good philosophy student, I have considered the possibility of hell and came up with the following set of reasons why I don't worry about it:

Scenario #1: There is a hell, and it's just like the Christians say it is, to include that nasty little qualifer about being saved. I'm not, so it's into the firey pits I go... but when I think about it, what would be the worse between that and being in heaven? If heaven is loaded with "the saved" and no one else, that makes God a pretty prejudicial being. Personally, I can't imagine heaven being all that great if it's an exclusive club for "Jesus Freaks," and thier egotistical master. I dislike this idea the most because it makes God into little more than a dictator. Hell can't possibly be worse than heaven if that's the case.

Scenario #2: There is a hell, but it's a little more like Madcat's idea. Okay, now I just have to worry about merits. Have I done horrible things? A few, if we're going to be honest. I'm not a perfect person, I have anger issues and problems with relating to people, etc. But I don't really think I'm a horrible person. Who knows on this one? God might find me wanting and give me a good reason before giving me the boot, I can accept that. I'm more hoping that if there is a God, He(She?)'ll appreciate the fact that I did try to make my life a positive one. Bit of a toss up here, but that's a hurdle I'll have to jump when the time comes.

Scenario #3: There isn't a hell, but there is a God and an afterlife. Well, this one is just in case everyone is wrong about what happens after death. I figure my chances are as good as everyone else's here, seeing as I have no idea what will happen.

Scenario #4: No hell, No God and I become wormfood... which is pretty much what I think is going to happen anyway. Personally, I don't much care for this scenario, but it's the one I accept seeing as I haven't any real evidence to the contrary. Well... good! Personally, the idea of immortality sounds a little boring. How many centuries would I be able to go before everything became dull and vapid? So I die and that's it... big deal. It's not like I'm going to be around to notice. My fleshy remains will distill into the soil, people will forget about me, 1000 years from now, no one will care... I can live with that (no pun intended).

So the end analysis comes down to this: If there is a God, he's either the morally perfect, all powerful swell being that most theists believe in, and He'll at least offer me consideration, or He's an obsessed, ego freak who wants everything His way and I wouldn't really like Him much if I met Him. If there isn't a God, I go into the dirt and become a fading memory. Ya know, I highly doubt anyone is going to make up a scenario that will cause me to tremble with fear on this topic.

Noa

User avatar
RouJoumis
Newbie
Posts: 18
Joined: Wed Nov 20, 2002 8:13 am
Location: way down Texas way
Contact:

umm... *open mouth, insert foot*

Post by RouJoumis »

um... maybe I'm wrong, but - I thought that the reason Christians resorted to the 'fright tactic' was because they were trying to help people.

I mean, the reasoning goes like this:

God is perfect. God made everything that exists. God made people, because He wanted to have a loving relationship with them. You can't have a real love for something unless you have the ability to choose not to love it, so God had to give us free will if He wanted us to be able to love Him back. So, He took the risk of making us with free will, even though He knew it would give us the chance to refuse Him, becauseHe wanted us to be able to love Him, even as He loves us. He knew that it would cause problems - but he thought that it would be worth it in the long run. Humans sinned (through Adam and Eve, anyway, who ended up tainting the whole race.) Now - because God is perfect, He can't live with people who are not perfect, because His justice demands that when there is sin, someone has to pay for it. That's pretty basic justice, right? That's why it is so hard for humans to forgive each other - because forgiving someone is basically saying "yeah, there's something you owe me because you hurt me, but instead of demanding it from you, I will pay that debt myself - I'll leave myself compromised by not demanding what I'm due." Well, since humanity was 'tainted', God knew that He couldn't live with them forever anymore. So, that meant that humans, with their eternal souls, couldn't live with Him anymore after death. They'd be eternally seperated from God!

So - according to this reasoning - every human - no matter what they believe or what they do - is inherently flawed and doomed to Hell (eternal existence without God.) You live, you die, you end up seperated from the source of all life and goodness. Yikes! Not a good thing at all! Fortunately for humans, God had a way around it - He sent Jesus to die, taking on all of that punishment for that original sin and its taint, along with the punishment for all other sins. Basically, God was taking that debt to himself - because Jesus is God - so that we don't have to pay it anymore. That means that it is now possible to live with God, instead of going to Hell. But the ONLY reason we can do that is because Jesus died.

BUT - there is still something to remember. You remember how God created man as someone to have a loving relationship with? And how that means that man has to love Him, and that it can only be real love if man still has the chance to choose against God? Well, that's why people have to believe in God and Jesus to be saved - because if they don't, then they are choosing against God. If they choose against God, then they are rejecting His gift and not loving Him - they aren't doing what they were made to do. He still loves them, but His nature says that they can't live with Him, because they are still stuck in the original sin of choosing against God. Jesus died for all men, but they have to believe in Him before it will do them any good.

So - basically, all men (yes, and women!) are doomed to die. Those who choose Jesus are given a way out - a Way to be with God after death. Those who don't, remain doomed. It's not a case of "Join us or you will be doomed" - it's "Oh, no! You're doomed! Believe in Him, and you can be saved!" It's not a case of infecting your enemy with the plague because he won't convert; it's a case of seeing that your 'enemy' has the plague, and trying to give him the cure that you yourself were given. If a Christian really understands just what he is preaching, than he isn't trying to CONDEMN people - he's trying to SAVE people who have already BEEN condemned - not by God, but by their own free will.

So.. the fact that God judges doesn't necessarily make him cruel, and Christians shouldn't be cruel either.. it's just that God is just.

I'm not sure I made any sense... :-? But I think that a lot of times Christians don't act right, and sometimes they do, and a lto of times other people don't act right, and sometimes they do, and it al lmakes for a bunch of very confusing arguments, and usually the most that these arguments do for anyone is give us a chance to reexamine our own viewpoints, and remember what and WHY we believe. I don't expect any of this to really convince anyone. I just get a little bothered when people complain about Christians being so 'judgemental'.. and maybe they're right and some Christians are. But it's not because it's such an integral part of Christianity! Christianity is about trying to help people find the one way to heaven, not about sending people to hell. No Christian has the power to send someone to hell. They simply don't. Only that one person has the power to make the choice whether or not they accept God, and only God has the soveriegn ability to send someone away from Him forever.

Erk. Rambling again. I'm going to bed before I write a full-length paper here and tick a bunch of people off - on all (not both, although a case for that could be made) sides of the issue(s)... probably too late for that.

Kinsfire
Regular Poster
Posts: 26
Joined: Fri Jan 01, 1999 4:00 pm
Location: Roselle, NJ USA
Contact:

Post by Kinsfire »

Those people on this list who are Christians, seem to believe that Noa's Scenario #1 is correct: There is a Hell, it's the way that the Christians say it is, and there's only one way to avoid it. What's that way? Jesus Christ.

Here's why I have a problem with it.

Ask most Christians, and they will tell you that reincarnation does not exist - you die, go before God, and God tells you where your destination is. Can we agree that that is the answer that most of those responding here who profess Christianity would give?

God is also supposed to be all-loving. We can agree to that as well, right?

Working under those assumptions (no reincarnation, and God has infinite capacity for loving), we now have the means by which you avoid Hell. There is one and only one method of avoiding the Hell of Noa's Scenario 1, and I mentioned it in the first paragraph. Accept Jesus Christ. All well and good, if you did.

If you didn't however, you're Hell-bound. No two ways about it. If you do not accept Christ as your savior, you're Hell-bound. All those Jews murdered by the Nazis in WWII? In Hell. Someone who's never had the chance to hear the Word and consider it? Hell. I won't even go into the concept of infants and children, since they're really too young to make an informed decision, although according to the rules...well, 'nuff said, as Stan Lee would say.

Okay, you're now in Hell. Let's assume that you lived 100 years on Earth, and never accepted Jesus. Okay, you're now in Hell for eternity. For a mistake you made in a one hundred year period, you're now stuck in a place worse than any of us can POSSIBLY imagine, for a trillion trillion trillion trillion ... (well, you get the idea) years.

Don't quote tough love at me, either, because tough love assumes that the individual in question will mend their ways. Once in Hell, there is no out. You're there for the above-mentioned span of time.

I refuse to believe that a God who is all-loving could consent to that - ETERNAL separation from the Presence. A God that can do that is little better than an abusive parent who says do things my way or I'll beat you to death, and means it.

In other words, I refuse to believe in a God that could permit the Hell that most Christians I've talked to seem to believe in - one strike and you're out.

I can, however, believe in a God that does any number of other things - such as:

1) You stay in Hell for the time it takes to learn whatever it is you need to learn, via whatever means are used. Once the lesson has been learned, you go to God.

2) Reincarnation. You keep going around until you finally hit it right, and then you're with God.

3) Who cares what you believed on Earth - the Presence of God makes you instantly realize, and repent, and therefore you are with God.

There are other ways I can think of but that gives the idea.

Another point my wife just reminded me of. God is infinite. We are finite. Hitler's evil was finite. Pay him back - yes. Make him spend a year for each person killed. Make him spend THREE years for each person killed. Whatever. His punishment should be finite. Hideous, perhaps, but as finite as he himself was.

I think it's a uniquely human trait to want someone to suffer infinite pain for a finite error.

Can an infinite God permit infinite punishment for FINITE evil? We come back to whether or not a God that can is worth worshiping.

I know what my decision is on that end. I will not worship a deity that can demand infinite punishment for finite mistakes.

Kinsfire

Arctyc
Regular Poster
Posts: 43
Joined: Mon Nov 04, 2002 8:26 am
Location: WI

Post by Arctyc »

There's much debate among Christians of every denomination about the age of cognizance and the destination of uninformed believers: heck, most of Dante's Inferno was his take on a possible situation for this quandary.

There's also the problem about human limitation. Essentially, it boils down to this. We can't comprehend God, God's full Glory, Hell, or Eternity until after we're dead. We simply are not capable. This goes with the "what if" situation on omnipotence.
Don't make me defenestrate you!

ZOMBIE USER 12886
Regular Poster
Posts: 46
Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 2:26 am

The can of worms is officially open.

Post by ZOMBIE USER 12886 »

Well, I should've expected a response like this. First, a humanistic one with the usual arguments about why God has nothing to do with human life. Second, another wishy-washy post from someone who claims to be Christian. The third I didn't expect: support from a fellow Believer. I guess I'm still getting over my expectations from Philosophy class my senior year at high school. If you want to know what I'm talking about, imagine the ideological (for lack of a better adj.) equivilent of being stuck on a deserted island with sharks swimming all around...

Apparently, I haven't recovered yet.

As for my post, well, I had recently listened to Toby Mac's solo album <u>Momentum</u>, so I felt like some hard-core witnessing. As I expected, I didn't change anyone's mind really. That's okay; changing the heart is what counts because ultimately that's where the problem lies. Change a man's mind, and you might change his attitude for a day. Change the heart, and you change the man for eternity.

As for you, Noa, I think I may have to write a rebuttal to your "scenarios". I'll try not to attack you personally. I don't think that would be right (i.e. it's not what God wants).

#1: The assumption that hell is little worse than heaven is a myth. If what the Bible says is true (and I believe it is), than heaven is far better than hell. I've read a couple books by a very good (Christian) author, and his description of hell freaks me out. Everything we take for granted here, even being able to puke or pee, is not permitted in hell. Granted, this is only his version, and things could be better or worse. One thing is for certain, if it exists, and you go there, you'll find it to be worse than anything you could imagine. That's why it's called the Second Death; it's just existence, and doesn't even come close to the requirements most government agencies require in hospitals and foster homes. There are some, though probably not many, down there that would give anything to have just five minutes back on earth, let alone heaven.

Oh, and as for God, is He a prejudicial God, or a judicial God? There's quite a difference you know.

#2: Here's a pole. If you run fast enough, and time it just right, you <i>just</i> might make it.

Good achievements won't get you into heaven if the Bible is true. That's why Jesus came in the first place, so we could get into heaven. It's not what you do; it's Who you know.

#3: So, Hitler's not in hell? Could you honestly say you'd want to spend eternity with the likes of Ghangis Kahn (sp?), Vlad the Impaler, and Osama Bin Laden? :roll: I suppose some of us would be having tea with Jack the Ripper then? He'd certainly have some interesting, if morbid, tales to tell.

Hell was made for a reason, though it's not built to last. Maybe people could come around to the truth, but if they haven't in this life, what makes you think they will in the next? People are stubborn; just look at us two fools. I doubt either one of us will move from our beliefs anytime soon. Which isn't the intent of this argument anyway.

#4: Ya know, you just slipped into the stereotype. According to "everyone", athiests will insert the Existentialist view sooner or later, proclaiming it to be the truth. Congratulations, you just made it harder for some people to see you as a person. :-? Far as I know, that doesn't include me. At least, not all the time.

So, God doesn't exist? Well then, life is a joke, and I might as well just shoot you in the head. Literally. After all, if there is no God, why shouldn't I? What's wrong with it? As far as I can see, I'd be doing you a favor. I might even go so far as to include your whole family and myself as well. Better yet, I'll just go to a party that you're at and detonate the sticks of dynamite strapped to my chest. Your family would miss out, but I'd be doing a random act of kindness, now wouldn't I?

By the way, eternity is only boring if you're in hell. If God truly knows everything, then He knows how to keep us entertained. And if you think He'll run out of ideas, chew on this: our finite knowledge will forever be only a fraction of His infinite knowledge. Kind of mind-blowing, isn't it?

Ockham's Razor people: the simplest solution is often the right one. Of course, being the Ultimate Jokester He is, God made it so everything is paradoxically both simple and complex at the same time. Makes things interesting.

Don't worry, Noa, you're not the only one I have a bone to pick with. Madcat and Kinsfire, you are waaaaay off base. God is just; that's why He sends people to hell. You can't say that a just God won't send people to hell because then you're projecting your idea of "fairness" on Him. And you have no right to do that. That's comparable to ethnocentrism; judging people of another culture base on the norms of your own, which isn't all that fair. Of course, I'm probably not one to talk, being a witnessing Christian and all. Granted, it's not a perfect metaphor either.

A lot of what I said probably sounds cliche, but then you could argue that <i>everything</i> we say or do is cliche in this day and age (a man by the name of Gergen already has). Since this is purely an academic/logical post, it is not intended to change your heart, only give you food for thought. If you think it's rancid meat, then you are welcome to pass; I won't force you to think like me because God forbids me to.

My last post probably wasn't too great either for two reasons:

1) Text on a screen is limited. Smilies :D and "stage directions" *scratches head as an example* do help, but online discussion ultimately fail to include all of the factors involved in face-to-face conversation. What you say isn't as important as how you say it, and text is pretty limited when you want to express something that doesn't use words.

2) I have some of the characteristics of Asperger's Syndrome, a new "disorder" that is similar to Autism. One of these characteristics is difficulty in social situations. I met a teacher of mine from high school, and for the life of me I couldn't remember her name! I remembered everything else about her, but her name eluded me. It took several hints from her to remember it (it figures that the "author" hint did it). I also drift in and out of conversation, tending to ignore what doesn't interest me. In short, I'm not the best at human relations.

I really don't care what any of you think of me. Think me a fool, an idiot, even a bigot. I don't care. God loved me enough to send His Son to die for me, and His opinion matters so much more to me than that of mere man.

But, arguments aside, I'm a real likable guy when you get to know me. I just wish people would take the time to.

ZOMBIE USER 12759
Regular Poster
Posts: 53
Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 2:26 am

Post by ZOMBIE USER 12759 »

I don't think you are an Idiot at all however:

considering that:

(1) Hell is infinitely bad

(2) God is infinitely just

it follows that going to hell should require:

(3) doing something infinitely evil

How many people do you know that have commited ABSOLUTE, TOTAL, PERFECT (as such) EVIL?

Did Ghengis Khan commit absoutely pure evil? Did Hitler? Osama? Maybe. But I'm not sure. To be certain, there's very little good in any of these people. I would have found it quite justified to end the lives of any of these men to prevent what they did. However, I question the absolute totality of the evil they committed. Keep in mind the possibility that some of these people may have been crazy enough that they actually believed that what they were doing was right.

Hell may or may not be empty, I'd like to think that it is. However, nobody gets sent there. That would imply that people are punished for Sin. They are not. We would be, but God was good enough to absolve us from that debt. Punishment is not part of the deal now. Some people though, consciously or not, might choose to GO there however. Basicly, the way things work, (from my perspective anyway, I'm a Catholic) is as follows: After you die, you remain much the same as you were before death. After all, eternity is not time, which is needed for change. Entropy does not apply, if you want to look at things from a physicist's point of view. The only real difference is this: You no longer have any physical needs or wealth. For perhaps the first time in your life, you get a chance to see yourelf as you truly are, without anything such as self-doubt or an inflated ego to get in your way. If you could see, and truly know that you were a good person, than that would be a better feeling than any that can be described. Not to mention of course that whatever relationship you had, to God, to family and friends, would not go away. On the other hand, a selfish, evil person would, stripped of all the worldly pleasures that gave him comfort, see nothing but the waste his/her life had been. Since the whole of this person's life had been about himself, he would be utterly and truly alone, with no company but the thought that his life was completely worthless. Many Atheists talk of how boring eternal life would grow to be. Well, that's Hell. Boredom can't really describe it though, since the suffering implied is far worse than any physical torment could ever be. Death would be a blessing, and without any body to die, it assuredly wouldn't be forthcoming. I had a long post on this, but the forum ate it, so sorry if this didn't make much sense.

User avatar
Skunk
Newbie
Posts: 6
Joined: Thu Nov 14, 2002 7:35 am

Re: The can of worms is officially open.

Post by Skunk »

Strange_Wulf wrote:So, God doesn't exist? Well then, life is a joke, and I might as well just shoot you in the head. Literally. After all, if there is no God, why shouldn't I? What's wrong with it? As far as I can see, I'd be doing you a favor. I might even go so far as to include your whole family and myself as well. Better yet, I'll just go to a party that you're at and detonate the sticks of dynamite strapped to my chest. Your family would miss out, but I'd be doing a random act of kindness, now wouldn't I?
I hope there's more stopping you from doing such things, than merely a belief in God's existence. Like, concern for the suffering you would cause to others due to the loss of a loved one(s), or concern for your own livelihood/life when a human system of justice takes hold of you. Even if it were to turn out that there is no God, I don't think you would want some disgruntled ex-Christian to do your family such a "favor."

Are you aware that the paragraph you wrote above gives a rather disturbing insight into what makes religious terrorists tick?
--SS

ZOMBIE USER 12293
Newbie
Posts: 23
Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 2:26 am

Post by ZOMBIE USER 12293 »

*blinks several times*

O-kaaaay... don't know how or even why I'm continuing this, but here goes again... hopefully for the last time. I will warn those who have read through this series that I am now going to get rather mean spirited.

First off, let me just say that this is exactly the reason why I never get into these discussions anymore. I'm tired of fighting with people over concepts of personal belief because someone will invariably take it as an excuse to extoll the virtues of thier ideology while denouncing everyone who doesn't conform to it. I can't even count how many times I've been a party to such arguements, but I am ashamed and embarrassed of my role in each of them.

The problem I have with staying queit in these shouting matches is that I get more than a little annoyed by those on the theist side of the fence speaking to me as if I am somehow spirtually crippled, blind or just plain stupid for not accepting the concept of God. Try as I might, I don't want to keep falling into the same old routine of shouting "PROVE HE EXISTS," but I seldom can refrain from such activity.

Strange_Wulf, you miss the point that I was attempting to illustrate.
#1: The assumption that hell is little worse than heaven is a myth. If what the Bible says is true (and I believe it is), than heaven is far better than hell. I've read a couple books by a very good (Christian) author, and his description of hell freaks me out. Everything we take for granted here, even being able to puke or pee, is not permitted in hell. Granted, this is only his version, and things could be better or worse. One thing is for certain, if it exists, and you go there, you'll find it to be worse than anything you could imagine. That's why it's called the Second Death; it's just existence, and doesn't even come close to the requirements most government agencies require in hospitals and foster homes. There are some, though probably not many, down there that would give anything to have just five minutes back on earth, let alone heaven.
So what you are saying in this one is that if God IS a dictator who demands that if I don't bend a knee and accept Jesus Christ as my personal savior that for the remainder of eternity I will suffer a screaming and endless horror that will surpass even the most awful experience I've ever known a hundred fold... wow, what a compassionate and caring God to allow for such a place to exist then set up a system where people like me, who just can't see or feel or comprehend one of dozens of religious concepts, will get to nash and wail in pure torment for all time. Any creature capable of such self gratification as to create billions of individual souls and then cast them into the pit of darkness for non-compliance is beneath reproach, let alone worship.
#2: Here's a pole. If you run fast enough, and time it just right, you just might make it.

Good achievements won't get you into heaven if the Bible is true. That's why Jesus came in the first place, so we could get into heaven. It's not what you do; it's Who you know
So every muslim, buddhist, jew, hindu, animist, wiccan, and especially athiest, is doomed to hell... even if they never heard of Jesus Christ. Again, I say, what a compassionate and caring God you have.
#3: So, Hitler's not in hell? Could you honestly say you'd want to spend eternity with the likes of Ghangis Kahn (sp?), Vlad the Impaler, and Osama Bin Laden? I suppose some of us would be having tea with Jack the Ripper then? He'd certainly have some interesting, if morbid, tales to tell.
The idea behind my #3 was to show that maybe everyone is wrong here and God has other plans... the idea of heaven and hell aren't the only concepts of the afterlife, you know.
#4: Ya know, you just slipped into the stereotype. According to "everyone", athiests will insert the Existentialist view sooner or later, proclaiming it to be the truth. Congratulations, you just made it harder for some people to see you as a person. Far as I know, that doesn't include me. At least, not all the time.
"Slipped into the steriotype"? Huh? Last time I checked, most athiests don't think there is an afterlife... but I guess I'm just a blind moronic steriotype who fails to understand God. Just for the record, oh pinnacle of originality in Christian thought, I never proclaimed it as being "truth." In fact my list was to demostrate a number of outcomes as to what happens after I die and express why I wasn't one to be frightened into yoiur religious concept with the notion of hell. But, as you are obviously an expert in matters of faith, do me one tiny little favor will you? PROVE ME WRONG! All I want from anyone with a need to convert my poor demented athiest soul is some evidence that I am wrong... that's all I ask. I don't need quotes from John 3:16, I could do without tales of prophets and ancient stories about who begat whom. All I want is someone to point in a direction and say, "there is the evidence of what I am saying. Look upon this and know God to be fact." And before you start in with the old cliche's, I'll list what doesn't count as evidence:

The bible. Sorry folks, it's a book to me. You can claim it was divinely inpired until you are blue in the face, but that doesn't make it a fact. Plus I can show you a few dozen books that various other people think are divinely inspired too, but you might not agree.

Creation. Yes, I know. Even with Petey's little outburst, this one really is a hard one for me. I don't have any idea for or against just because the universe exists... in fact, I'm pretty sure there is a logical arguement somewhere that puts this one out of bounds on some reasonable notion, but couldn't say where to look for such an arguement. I don't know how the universe got here, but let's just say "an accident" is about as justified as "God dunnit," which means both sides should probabaly not touch it.

Personal experiences. Sorry again, folks. I know that every Christian out there has a few tales to tell about how God touched thier lives. But unless you have a gift to raise the dead, walk on water, heal the sick, etc. as a result of it, I'm afraid that it's for your benifet only. Again, I can find other people from other religions who have had similar experiences, and you will have to explain why your religious concepts trump thiers.

Jumping up and down saying "but I really really BELIEVE that God exists." I think this one was already a given for a good majority of the people reading this post... but, for the sake of formality (and the fact that I'm certain the one person who DOESN'T take this as a given is almost certain to be the next one to post), I'm including it.

Personally, I'd rather not have to go into this one, but I have to make it clear that the burden of proof is on the claimant, not the defendant here. Ergo, you can't come back on me and say "well, prove He DOESN'T exist." I can't even technically prove that reindeer can't fly, that little green men don't live on Mars or that Elvis isn't dead. If you have studied logic you will know that proving a negative is very difficult if not outright impossible in most cases. The best I can do is say "under the conditions that I understand, in the context of which I live, these things have never been witnessed by me in any way, therefore, they haven't proven themselves in fact to me at this time." Sounds like a cop-out, I know. But I'm not the one threatening you with the notion of eternal damnation and misery for being wrong.

Let this ugly game begin again for the billionth time... and if God exists, may He have mercy on our souls for letting this thread go this far,

Noa

ZOMBIE USER 12886
Regular Poster
Posts: 46
Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 2:26 am

*sigh* Forget it.

Post by ZOMBIE USER 12886 »

Noa, I didn't even read your last post all the way through, because frankly I'm sick and tired of arguing.

What's the use of us arguing over whether morality comes from God or not? Wouldn't our time be better spent <i>applying</i> it?

I'm not going to post to this thread anymore. I've given my two cents, and things are not likely to calm down anytime soon. Neither of us has convinced the other to change their opinions, and to be honest, I really don't feel like trying.

It feels like philosophy class all over again. No matter how hard I argue, I can't seem to change my opponents mind. And now that I think about it, I don't want to. What use is it to change your mind for a few days? You might just become a bigger athiest than before.

So, I'm withdrawing. I'll still be around the forum, but don't count on catching me here again. It may sound weird or stuck up to you, but I'll pray that God keeps working on your heart. Who knows? Maybe one day you will come to Him. I just have to let go, and stop acting like I'm the one who has control over your fate. I can only have so much influence. It's up to God to push you through the final steps.

No matter what you believe, remember He still loves you. It may not seem like it sometimes, but He does. He doesn't want to send anybody to hell, but He has to, because it's His nature to punish sin.

As to whether hell is forever or just temporary, I believe it's forever, even if you can't accept that. The thing is, I don't have all the answers, and I'm tired of pretending that I do. It just doesn't do any good.

So, from one fool to another, I bid you goodbye and good fortune.

-Strange Wulf

User avatar
Calbeck
Regular Poster
Posts: 595
Joined: Fri Jan 01, 1999 4:00 pm
Location: The Land of AZ
Contact:

Re: John Lennon's "Imagine"

Post by Calbeck »

Rrrg...sorry for the multipost, Keenspace hung and I kept hitting the submit button thinking it didn't take. -:P How d'ya DELETE stuff?! -:(
Last edited by Calbeck on Thu Dec 05, 2002 4:37 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Calbeck
Regular Poster
Posts: 595
Joined: Fri Jan 01, 1999 4:00 pm
Location: The Land of AZ
Contact:

On God

Post by Calbeck »

Oooooh...kay.

I think it's time to bring out the Heavy Cream Pie Artillery.

Here's my take on God --- seriously:

THE BIG BANG
God created/was created by the Big Bang. I believe this is possible, even probable, in accordance with what we know about the conditions immediately (as in nanoseconds) following the Big Bang. Numerous laws of the universe DID NOT EXIST at the original instant. This is current scientific understanding. The universe had to expand a bit before these laws could kick in.

Ergo, since the laws of the universe were substantially different prior to those few nanoseconds, what's so impossible about the idea of an energy-based being capable of developing sentience --- a massive, powerful SOUL, as it were --- being ejected from the fires of creation itself? Perhaps God's own development of sentience TRIGGERED the Bang: "Let there be Light". An exertion of sentient will pushing the balance of mass and gravity over the edge into glory.


IN THE BEGINNING
It is understood that, before any planets with life came into being, billions of years passed. Let's assume for a moment that you CAN'T die, and you've nothing to do but roam around a universe filled with cooling matter.
It's my belief that God developed Himself during this time as well --- learning to exert his soul to manipulate objects and manifest His will upon the universe a bit at a time. What else was He going to do, sit there?

Having done this, all God could reasonably be expected to do during all that remaining time was to experiment. And talk to Himself. A LOT.

Thus the angels. They make sense in terms of being company, sounding boards, friends. What's to prevent an energy being with wide-reaching psychic powers from creating Artificial Intelligence? It might also explain why the angels are often described as having no real free will of their own --- they're constructs, hardwired in their thinking processes. Because God had to program them in the first place.

This would in turn explain Lucifer --- tired of Yes-Men, God creates a No-Man, just to be able to hear a different view on various subjects. Meaning that Lucifer literally can't help being negative, it's how he was programmed.

Which brings us to Humanity.


GOD CREATED THE HEAVENS AND THE EARTH
"...and the Earth was shapeless and without form".

Read Genesis with a guide to planetary and biological evolution, and you'll find they match almost perfectly. Gas cloud to compact ball covered with water to tectonic activity to continents to sea-dwelling creatures to land-dwellers to birds to humans.

Consider, for a moment, the idea that Earth is in fact one of the oldest planets around. We are, in fact, on the very edge of our spiral galaxy and therefore cooled more rapidly from the Bang. We might just possibly be the first planet that Life evolved on.

And Life, unlike other forms of matter, doesn't hew to any set pattern of behavior.

This would make Life VERY INTERESTING to a being billions of years old who's always looking for something new and different.

I can only imagine God, or maybe one of the angels, discovering LICHEN.

----------------
"Lord! My Lord God! Get a load of this!"

"What is it, Mike, another quasar with an erratic pulse? And put that thing away before you hurt yourself..."

"No, not at all! It's...well...it's getting bigger and spreading all over the place and DOING stuff on its OWN!"

*God becomes a heat-streak afterimage*

"Wow. Just...wow. Lookit that."
-----------------

*gryns* Boy, I sure HOPE God has a sense of humor... -;>

Anyways, you BET He's going to fiddle with the stuff. And as it evolves, He learns about DNA and how to rig it up to do various things. He studies animal behavior and how natural societies of critters behave.

And he notices this one particular batch of land-dwelling critters that seems to have potential for developing sentience of their own.


IN THE GARDEN OF EDEN, BABY
Now, this is what God wanted all along. Honest, free-willed, openminded COMPANY. Someone to talk to, reason with, to share His love of the universe and everything in it with.

There were two major jumps in human evolution that don't follow the previous patterns of very slow development --- Neanderthal and Cro-Magnon (Modern Man). Even Neanderthal is such a jump from the previous versions that science has been looking for a "Missing Link" since the days of Darwin. But what if Neanderthal is simply what happened when God messed with the DNA of the prior species? But Neanderthal wasn't close enough, incapable of progressing past a basic nomadic society (not much to talk to), so God "upgraded" to Cro-Magnon.

And you get Adam and Eve, the first Cro-Magnons. The entire story of the Garden of Eden is how A&E went from innocent creatures of the woods to beings informed as to the very nature of Good and Evil --- and what IS sentience aside from that?

Once ejected from the Garden into the "real world", A&E stumble across pre-existing people --- Neanderthals. One thing we DO know is that when Cro-Magnon came on the scene, Neanderthals disappeared VERY quickly, although there is no evidence that this was a matter of mass murder. Instead, Neanderthal seems to have been bred out by Cro-Magnon, and in fact some Neanderthalic traits continue to surface from time to time in modern human beings.

It would make sense that, having created Modern Man, God would use the existing Neanderthal populace as a breeding ground to pass on the critical genetic codes. This, incidentally, addresses the very real point brought up by critics of Christianity that no two human beings could realistically populate the Earth while providing necessary genetic diversity.


IN SUMMARY
God got bored, made angels for company, got bored with them, discovered life, tweaked it to make humanity, and went from there.

What we are, then --- assuming that I haven't got my head COMPLETELY up my keester --- is God's Children in a very real way. He reacts to us very much in the way that a father might when confronted by willful children. I think He's gotten to the point, as most parents do, where He's realized that all He really can do is point the way and let us decide whether to heed His advice or not.

And that's really all the Bible is, when you look at it: a collection of very good advice, when looked at in context. Some is outdated, some was slapped on by well-meaning (or not-so-well-meaning) persons, and some is just plain eternal good sense.

But what do I really think God wants from us? Love. Consideration. And most of all, He wants us to make Him proud by achieving and growing beyond that which we already are.

Heaven is a coffee joint. -;>
Last edited by Calbeck on Thu Dec 05, 2002 4:59 pm, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
Calbeck
Regular Poster
Posts: 595
Joined: Fri Jan 01, 1999 4:00 pm
Location: The Land of AZ
Contact:

On God

Post by Calbeck »

Strange_Wulf wrote:But in the end, no amount of arguing can change a person's mind. The so-called "Christians" on this forum aren't doing their job. God says to preach the Good News everywhere at all times. All I hear is a bunch of wishy-washy ideas that are <i>not</i> of God.
Okay, here I gotta take issue with ya.

First, God said nothing about preaching the Gospel everywhere, all the time. Paul did. For all that Paul was, he was not God, and his word is not God's even if it shows up in the same book that God's word happens to be in. It may be good advice, but I'm not going to hell for not following it.

Second, it's your opinion that the ideas here, wishy-washy or otherwise, are not of God. That's for God to say, not you or me. And personally I would love to be able to sit down with God over coffee and donuts and talk with Him directly about all this. -:)
Let me make this clear: I'm a Jesus Freak, and I will shout the Gospel from the rooftops if I have to.
Do as you will, but remember that man is convinced by reason and love, not decibel.
Maybe this isn't the place to do this, but I encourage all those reading to repent of their sins and ask Jesus to come into their hearts right now.
Been there, done that, got the salvation. -;)
By the way, Calbeck, maybe we did screw up the Bible. But if that's so, than why do our current translations match the Dead Sea Scrolls so well?
They don't. Our current translations don't even match each other --- grab a King James, New American, and/or any other version of the Bible you care to, and compare. Differences abound.

Then there's the Dead Sea Scrolls, which have no Old Testament --- they were a contemporary record of life during the time of Christ, and what makes them interesting is that in terms of GENERALITIES --- not specifics --- they describe a number of the events listed in the New Testament. It is important to note here that the Dead Sea Scrolls were NOT created by followers of Christ, but by a Jewish sect that took an interest in Christ and his multitudes as a matter of curiosity.

The Dead Sea Scrolls, in short, are not a mirror image, or even a close approximation, of the Gospel According to John or any of the other apostles. It's simply an historical confirmation that there WAS a Christ, he DID run around with a lot of people, and there WERE many miracles ascribed to him (though the people who wrote the Scrolls didn't see any in person).
Even if the council of Nicea had no right to mess with God's Word, He has used that "screwed-up" version to save countless souls.
How? God didn't edit, publish, or distribute any of the Bibles. He has had no interaction with the Book since before it was even collated. Mankind, not God, has used the Bible both to save souls and damn them. It has been our will, not God's, that guided our use of His Word --- not to mention all the extra words we added, and whatever of His that we clipped out when we found it inconvenient.
How can you suggest it's not the way it's supposed to be?
How can you suggest there's a way it's supposed to be in the first place?
After all, there are no coincidences when it comes to God.
Nor is God required to do anything to match our ideals of Him. If we screw up the Bible, God is not required to stop us, edit what we write, or even "inspire" us to write something other than what we wish to write. He has no obligation to appear in a head of fire and thunder to correct Tammy Fay Bakker or Desmond Tutu of the error of their ways.

That is what free will is about --- there can be no faith without it.
I'm okay now; my blood pressure's back to normal. And the only one I'll answer to is either God or Ralph, so don't anyone try to tell me to shut up. I've been silent for too long anyway.
No problem, I'm a Neo-Protestant. Faith comes from challenging ideas. -:)
Last edited by Calbeck on Thu Dec 05, 2002 3:52 pm, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
Calbeck
Regular Poster
Posts: 595
Joined: Fri Jan 01, 1999 4:00 pm
Location: The Land of AZ
Contact:

Re: John Lennon's "Imagine"

Post by Calbeck »

RHJunior wrote:... interesting how John Lennon's Imagine went.
Yep. On occasion, I like to point out to folks that Lennon's ideal of society is really rather miserable..."no country", for example, means "no sewage system" amongst many other things. Can't have a sewer system without a city, can't have a city without a government to manage it, and can't have a government without getting a country into the bargain.

Not to mention the fact that the world will only "live as one" when there is nothing to disagree about strongly enough to want to live apart from others...which means no one would be ALLOWED to disagree with anyone else. Even if it's just a matter of divvying up the buffalo carcass for the evening meal, people are going to disagree over who gets what share.

It goes on and on --- when I "Imagine" what Lennon had in mind, I can only conjure up a herdlike system where individuals mean nothing and striving beyond one's existing place is impossible. At the very least, a VERY boring life. :-?

Post Reply