So Tracker IS gay, then.

Allan_ecker · Post by **Allan_ecker** » Thu Mar 14, 2002 8:49 am

"Oop! No, no massages from busty, scantily clad women for me! Nope nope nope!!"

Verdict: NOT bisexual.

Andrick · Post by **Andrick** » Thu Mar 14, 2002 10:02 am

Was it really in question? Come on, could you take Fosa at face value?

Rin_desu · Post by **Rin_desu** » Thu Mar 14, 2002 12:06 pm

well, tracker could be bisexual.
just that i know from experience, women often don't give the best massages since often they lack appropriate upper-body strength, and while the technique may be there, there's no power to the punch.

still, you can always put it on your head for a hat. and a free massage is better than a poke in the eye.

something to think about, i guess.

PDI · Post by **PDI** » Thu Mar 14, 2002 1:46 pm

He's gay because he turns down an unsolicited massage from a complete stranger in a hotel in a country he's never been in?

Allan_ecker · Post by **Allan_ecker** » Thu Mar 14, 2002 6:08 pm

Awwwwwwwww, alright, you win.

We'll just have to chalk this up to Tracker's "sixth sense" and or intuition, then.

Quoting_mungo · Post by **Quoting_mungo** » Fri Mar 15, 2002 6:18 am

Meh. Massages tend to involve being (almost) completely undressed... That's vurneable. I know I'm a chicken, but still, -I- wouldn't leave myself so vurneable for a stranger... Nooope.

*giggle* As for upper body strength... I only say one thing... Charlie's Angels.

And I'm not partial because Lucy Liu's in it, oh, no!

PDI · Post by **PDI** » Fri Mar 15, 2002 11:03 am

Hmmm....massage on a fur would be different, wouldn't it?

Quoting_mungo · Post by **Quoting_mungo** » Fri Mar 15, 2002 12:03 pm

Eh, point... *g* I'll blame the fact I was p far too late last night or something (and just whose fault was that?)(Shuddup, conscience!).

Still... Vurneable if one had anything that could pass as a weapon in one's clothes...

PDI · Post by **PDI** » Fri Mar 15, 2002 3:12 pm

No, it would still be a vulnerable moment, I was going off on a tangent. I think fur massage would use a thinner oil, that would make the coat glossy, and the strokes would generally all go with the grain of the fur.

Talbon · Post by **Talbon** » Sun Mar 17, 2002 9:28 pm

On a side note, Tracker is most definately in a relationship with Wilt as suggested by the two moving in together and since the nature of their relationship has yet to be stated perhaps Tracker seeing an exotic redhead on the side would be a no-no for other reasons than his sexual preference.

Allan_ecker · Post by **Allan_ecker** » Mon Mar 18, 2002 12:19 am

Good point! I know that my relationship with my girlfriend makes me uncomfortable in sexually charged situations with either sex. For example, there's this really hot guy in my dorm that plays the GM in the roll playing games and has this beautiful beard and glasses and his great hair and this voice...

eh-heh.

Well, Karla digs him, too, so we both joke about how hot he is, thus preventing any Charles-pouncing on either side.

Talbon · Post by **Talbon** » Mon Mar 18, 2002 7:18 am

*grin* Have the both of you ever thought of pouncing Charlie together?

Quoting_mungo · Post by **Quoting_mungo** » Mon Mar 18, 2002 12:02 pm

On 2002-03-15 15:12, PDI wrote:
No, it would still be a vulnerable moment, I was going off on a tangent. I think fur massage would use a thinner oil, that would make the coat glossy, and the strokes would generally all go with the grain of the fur.

Matters on how deep it goes into the fur, of course, but if it's a matter of digging fingers into the fur, sorta, then I think just about any direction but against the grain of the fur would be good. Sidewards in it usually isn't a problem...

Yes, I know, irrelevant.

Illian · Post by **Illian** » Mon Mar 18, 2002 12:43 pm

On 2002-03-18 07:18, Talbon wrote:
*grin* Have the both of you ever thought of pouncing Charlie together?

That's what I was thinking . . .