I actually did a blog about this in a little more detail so I'm just going to post a few pics here, you can always go to my blog if you want more insight.
So here we go, feel free to laugh:
Sh!t Happens






Maelstrom Heart






Flying Tigers






Living the Dream




RobboAKAscooby wrote:![]()
I'm aiming to just compare the first two images with the last one- If you had shown me these without me knowing you, I would have not been able to guess that these were by the same person.
To be honest I'm not really sure where varying the line thickness would be useful. I do use thinner lines for faces and other fine-detail areas simply so I have more space to work with, but that's about it. I also do all of my drawing with a mouse so it's hard to vary the line thickness within an single layer.VeryCuddlyCornpone wrote:One thing that's been consistent for you over basically the whole selection of images there, except for Rall's mom it seems, is that you use the same line thickness throughout each entire piece. I wonder how your work would look if you started playing around with that a bit more.
There are other "interior" lines that often benefit from a thinner line being used, for instance the line where a person's sleeve stops and their emerging arm begins. The trick is that the thickness of a line often tells us how far apart two planes are. Like, if you were to draw two frisbees in the air at different distances, the one closer to us, in addition to being larger space-wise, could also use a larger outline than the farther-away one. Or a character with one hand on his stomach and one hand in front of his stomach but closer to the "audience," a thicker line on the hand that's "closer" to us makes it more distinguished from his body than the hand resting on his stomach.Terotrous wrote:To be honest I'm not really sure where varying the line thickness would be useful. I do use thinner lines for faces and other fine-detail areas simply so I have more space to work with, but that's about it. I also do all of my drawing with a mouse so it's hard to vary the line thickness within an single layer.VeryCuddlyCornpone wrote:One thing that's been consistent for you over basically the whole selection of images there, except for Rall's mom it seems, is that you use the same line thickness throughout each entire piece. I wonder how your work would look if you started playing around with that a bit more.
Thanks CuddlyVeryCuddlyCornpone wrote:I'm aiming to just compare the first two images with the last one- If you had shown me these without me knowing you, I would have not been able to guess that these were by the same person.
Yeah.VeryCuddlyCornpone wrote:I think that SH- R along with its cohorts in time was where you had the most obvious problem with flatness and rigidity. I have to say that although there was generally improvement all throughout, the most recent pictures show the hugest strides in terms of three-dimensional anatomy.
I can't use a brush pen with my crappy hands other than that my inking process is pretty much identical to yours.VeryCuddlyCornpone wrote:I know what you mean about having difficulty with tools. When I am workign on a close-up panel or something with a lot of motion, I can use a brush pen that has a lot of variety for line width, but for all my other lines I alternate between specifically sized technical pens. Lot of picking up, uncapping, using, recapping, putting down. I can get some varying width out of the tech pens though it's less noticeable than it is with the brush pen.
Yes, yes you do.djracodex wrote:I love these sorts of parties!
Yalp, now I need to compile some embarrassment to share...
Long way to go, but glad it's starting to show.djracodex wrote: Shcoob, seeing the energy into your poses creep in and take over is really great!
djracodex wrote:I love all the bra shots lol
Yes!djracodex wrote:There, that was funI hope more people post!
Someone went Super Saiyan there for a whiledjracodex wrote:
Hmmm? Have we ever done a Summer art swap around here?djracodex wrote:![]()
YESSSS!!!!VeryCuddlyCornpone wrote:Lol wait guys wait
No, she's not a bandicoot. She's a...actually, I don't know what the hell she's supposed to be.RobboAKAscooby wrote:And, Cope, was that Crash Bandicoot at the beginning?
Cuddly, that is so adorable that I'm almost disappointed you've progressed as an artist.VeryCuddlyCornpone wrote: