Mercury Hat wrote:But there is so much negative history behind it that to use it so freely means at best you're unaware of its origins:
Nnnnooooo . . . as I said, I am quite aware of its origins, and I have heard it used in a derogatory manner before. I've heard virtually every racial slur against blacks that exists, including a large number of them that are no longer in common usage and/or have gradually come to mean something else. "Nappy", as far as I have been aware, is one of these in the latter category.
Hell, the big baddie of 'em all, "nigger", has meant a million different things over the course of its history. It originally meant any slow or lazy person and didn't gain major use against blacks until much much later. Even though it still retains its derogatory meaning as well, it's also used among black people in a far less racially charged way.
And I've just taken the time to look into the Don Imus thing, and from the transcripts from the incident, it seems to be that "nappy headed hos" is just one of a number of rather unfortunate remarks he and McGuirk made - most of which were far worse - and it was the exchange as a whole that was the problem, not just his admittedly racially derogatory use of the word "nappy".
Really, I'm sorry you're all PC butthurt over the whole thing. I'm sure that saying that Edward has crappy looking hair - be he white, black, or sparkly - really hurts you deep inside, and I think we should keep on arguing about it because it's so terribly important to the integrity of the forums as a whole that nobody try to use a new, non-offensive definition of a word.
Oh noes! I'm being
sarcastic! I must have learned it from the overbearing master of sarcasm, good ol' Mercury Hat. PS, getting sarcastic in a debate does not become an administrator, Merc. It's petty and unnecessary. It's just fine for me to do it, tho', 'cause you did it first and that just makes me childish instead.
But hey, if it helps, maybe Derek
did mean it specifically in the racially offensive way and you can ban him and everyone can by happy happy. It's possible, especially given the "white boy" part. And for serious here . . . if he
did mean it that way, then I agree, it's not okay.
I'm just trying to point out that it doesn't mean that to
everyone. Some people call cigarettes fags . . . that doesn't mean they want to light homosexuals on fire and inhale the smoke.
Words aren't important. Intent is.
Mixed_Myth wrote:Just a thought. The word might have more weight up here than in Mississippi not because there are more bigots, but because people tend to be more concious of the issue.
Perhaps, but specifically conscious of the issue in a "hey, this is a really great slur to use, so let's use it as much as possible" way, unfortunately.
It's a thought with merit. Perhaps "nappy" has managed to slide into non-offensive territory in Mississippi purely because there are so many more worse things that both sides have called each other over the decades. It's social progress by way of saturation!
spaceprincess wrote:wasn't this thread about how people don't like a group of fans because they enjoy a book series?
And it's most likely time it got back to that. Hating on people for their race or sexual orientation is wrong because they were born into those things. Hating on people for liking a book series is okay because they chose that course of their own free will!
So good day, ladies and gentlemen, and have fun with that.
Existence is a series of catastrophes through which everything barely but continually survives.