Heart wrote:There's a certain logic to it, you need to -have- diabetes before you can beat it.
Rkolter wrote:Heart wrote:There's a certain logic to it, you need to -have- diabetes before you can beat it.
You could beat someone who had diabetes...
McDuffies wrote:Similarly, I'm not nearsighted anymore. I'm a person with near sight.
Sounds like we need to beat you so you can see.McDuffies wrote:Similarly, I'm not nearsighted anymore. I'm a person with near sight.
Dr Legostar wrote:Rkolter wrote:Heart wrote:There's a certain logic to it, you need to -have- diabetes before you can beat it.
You could beat someone who had diabetes...
did you know you're not supposed to call them "diabetics" anymore? they are now "people with diabetes."
Rkolter wrote:Thankfully, there is no constitutional right to not be offended.
KWill wrote:Rkolter wrote:Thankfully, there is no constitutional right to not be offended.
Depends on the constitution.
Rkolter wrote:You aren't allowed to offend people? What happens if you do?
KWill wrote:Rkolter wrote:You aren't allowed to offend people? What happens if you do?
Depending on the gravity of the offense, fines to jail time.
KWill wrote:Rkolter wrote:You aren't allowed to offend people? What happens if you do?
Depending on the gravity of the offense, fines to jail time.
Rkolter wrote:KWill wrote:Rkolter wrote:You aren't allowed to offend people? What happens if you do?
Depending on the gravity of the offense, fines to jail time.
That's so awesome. I can think of a million ways to abuse that.
KWill wrote:Rkolter wrote:
That's so awesome. I can think of a million ways to abuse that.
Most of which have most likely been anticipated by German lawmakers and regulated in § 185 ff. StGB. =P
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests