sput wrote:
Joel Fagin wrote:
Turnsky wrote:
Rusty Knight wrote:
And here's some junk I'm throwing around instead of drawing Dissent:


sput wrote:
Joel Fagin wrote:
Turnsky wrote:
Rusty Knight wrote:
Jackhass wrote:I think Stan Lee makes his entire living these days making cameos in Marvel movies...
MixedMyth wrote:Jackhass wrote:I think Stan Lee makes his entire living these days making cameos in Marvel movies...
Don't forget Who Wants to be a Super Hero.
ryclaude wrote:I'd say don't forget the extortionate amount of money he gets from marvel for doing absolutely nothing.
ryclaude wrote:I'd say don't forget the extortionate amount of money he gets from marvel for doing absolutely nothing.
mcDuffies wrote:Fame is nice but one cannot live from it.
mcDuffies wrote:ryclaude wrote:I'd say don't forget the extortionate amount of money he gets from marvel for doing absolutely nothing.
To my knowledge Lee got pretty much ripped off by Marvel and lended with almost no money for all the work he's done in past (I'd add that it's a crappy work but it doesn't excuse not paying him properly). I heard that he had it really bad until he managed to sell Spiderman franchise to Hollywood (and later other franchises of his). Fame is nice but one cannot live from it.
ryclaude wrote:One other thing that comes to mind was that stan's method of writing was very heavily dependent on the artists. Which might explain why a lot of the dialogue is just saying what's plainly visible in the pictures. Though i'm not sure how true that is either. giant wasps nest.
ryclaude wrote:I could believe that seeing as I cant remember where I heard about Stan's lawsuits. coulda had negative spin.
All i got on Wikipedia was "Lee in 2005 filed a lawsuit against Marvel for his unpaid share of profits from Marvel movies, winning a settlement of more than $10 million." so he didnt really sell it. Think the rights wound up with Marvel the company years back. Eh, it all boggles my mind.
One other thing that comes to mind was that stan's method of writing was very heavily dependent on the artists. Which might explain why a lot of the dialogue is just saying what's plainly visible in the pictures. Though i'm not sure how true that is either. giant wasps nest.
RPin wrote:It's not nostalgia at all, but I find oldschool Lee/Ditko Spiderman comics a lot more enjoyable than any of the recent crap they've been churning out.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests