Aquastorm wrote:Some facts on circumcision:
The 12th-century physician and rabbi Moses Maimonides advocated male circumcision for its ability to curb a man's sexual appetite.
Male circumcision was introduced into English-Speaking countries in the late 1800s as a method of treating and preventing masturbation.
They may well be facts, but it doesn't make them logical arguments for or against circumcision.
12th century medicine (and the medieval period in general) was a scary thing. With germ-theory hundreds of years away, and the prevailing belief that the body's well being relied on the balance of the four humours (blood, phlegm, yellow bile, and black bile.) Surgery was a brutal prospect, and very much a last resort for any doctor. Blood-letting, however, was all the rage, yet the circulatory system was still undiscovered. Moses Maimonides may have been advocating circumcision for what he thought were all the right reasons, but his empirical proof most likely came from a place insane (by today's medical standards anyway.)
I'm not even going to get started on the insanity that was personal health in the Victorian era... Only because I'm a bit macabre and would probably rant on and on
Anyways, just for a bit of fun, here's a 12th century medical diagram illustrating what ailments an average doctor could be expected to deal with over the course of his career -
If I was alive in the middle ages, just walking out the front door would be enough to curb my sexual appetite.
Told you I was a bit macabre...
I shall keep myself in oysters for the rest of the week, thank you very much.