Viva Piñata-phobia!

Deckard Canine
Regular Poster
Posts: 295
Joined: Thu Oct 12, 2006 5:21 am
Location: DC

Post by Deckard Canine »

shyal_malkes wrote:I respect more and more how Ralph gets out more then I do.
Given that this information comes from TV and the Internet, "getting out more" seems optional with regard to American cultural education. But, uh, do get out more for the sake of exercise and sociality.

Soylent Green seems like one of those pieces of culture that is important to know but completely unnecesessary to view. I have other Charlton Heston films to see first.

RHJunior
Cartoon Hero
Posts: 1689
Joined: Fri Jan 01, 1999 4:00 pm
Location: WV
Contact:

Post by RHJunior »

Soylent Green and others of its ilk are the retarded offspring of a brain-damaged intellectual elitist. The author of "The Population Bomb" should be publicly flogged and then dragged off in chains for the damage his pseudo-intellectual, humanophobic, fact-devoid fearmongering book has wrought in the world.
"What was that popping noise ?"
"A paradigm shifting without a clutch."
--Dilbert

User avatar
Wanderwolf
Regular Poster
Posts: 705
Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2006 6:18 pm
Location: Forney, TX, U.S.A.
Contact:

Post by Wanderwolf »

RHJunior wrote:Soylent Green and others of its ilk are the retarded offspring of a brain-damaged intellectual elitist. The author of "The Population Bomb" should be publicly flogged and then dragged off in chains for the damage his pseudo-intellectual, humanophobic, fact-devoid fearmongering book has wrought in the world.
Actually, Paul Ehrlich, Ph.D. (author of "Population Bomb", and currently Bing Professor of Population Studies at Stanford University; he's an entomologist, specializing in Lepidoptera; that's butterflies to you and me) wrote the book at the prompting of David Brower, who was then the executive director of the Sierra Club. Brower had seen similarly-themed articles written by Ehrlich for New Scientist magazine.

To be fair, though, the overall impact of "Population Bomb", outside the world of speculative fiction, was pretty minimal. About the only real-world adjustments were those which allowed greater access to contraception. (If you're referencing the "Human Interest" article that calls it one of the most damaging books of the twentieth century, Ralph, keep in mind Darwin's Origin of Species got an honorable mention on that list...)

In any event, even Ehrlich never expected to be much of a prophet. From the first edition of "Population Bomb":
Paul Ehrlich, PH.D. wrote:The possibilities are infinite; the single course of events that will be realized is unguessable. We can, however, look at a few possibilities as an aid to our thinking, using a device known as a 'scenario'. Scenarios are hypothetical sequences of events used as an aid in thinking about the future, especially in identifying possible decision points...Remember, these are just possibilities, not predictions.
While Ehrlich's writings did play a part in "Make Room, Make Room" by Henry Harrison (heck, Ehrlich wrote the foreword), they have nothing to do with Soylent Green, which is just sci-fi horror; the movie owes more to Swift's "A Modest Proposal" than to "Population Bomb".

While I agree he should stick to butterflies, Ehrlich doesn't get credit for "Soylent Green". If anything, part of the credit goes to Harry Harrison for abandoning his trademark humor while keeping his trademark misanthropy, thus making the book unsuitable for direct conversion to a movie.

Yours truly,

The wolfish,

Wanderer

User avatar
Wallaroo_Blacke
Regular Poster
Posts: 196
Joined: Fri Jan 01, 1999 4:00 pm
Location: -Location Withheld- in Texas
Contact:

Post by Wallaroo_Blacke »

RHJunior wrote:Soylent Green and others of its ilk are the retarded offspring of a brain-damaged intellectual elitist. The author of "The Population Bomb" should be publicly flogged and then dragged off in chains for the damage his pseudo-intellectual, humanophobic, fact-devoid fearmongering book has wrought in the world.
Ditto the person that thought of the plan of Zero Population Growth.

If said person considered the diseases, war, and famine that are wiping
out humankind (not to mention accidents, crime, and mortality-related
deaths) by the thousands, said person should just chucked thier
manuscript in the nearest fireplace to get the logs aflame.

However... I think we do need space staions like in "Silent Running" though.

Deckard Canine
Regular Poster
Posts: 295
Joined: Thu Oct 12, 2006 5:21 am
Location: DC

Post by Deckard Canine »

W_B, I don't follow you. Are you saying that overpopulation is not a problem because enough people are dying to prevent it?

User avatar
Wallaroo_Blacke
Regular Poster
Posts: 196
Joined: Fri Jan 01, 1999 4:00 pm
Location: -Location Withheld- in Texas
Contact:

Post by Wallaroo_Blacke »

Well, ALMOST.

But the person-in-question didn't figure into
account those factors of those things... on a
yearly basis. In any case, I'm just ramblin'.

:(

User avatar
Wanderwolf
Regular Poster
Posts: 705
Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2006 6:18 pm
Location: Forney, TX, U.S.A.
Contact:

Post by Wanderwolf »

Wallaroo_Blacke wrote:Ditto the person that thought of the plan of Zero Population Growth.
Well, the concept of ZPG was created by sociologist Kingsley Davis, who actually coined the term. Since he died nine years ago, though, you're probably thinking of the one who started the actual plan in China.

China's implementation of the ZPG idea is the Planned Birth Policy, known over here as the One Child Policy. Problem is, there is no one person who designed it; it was run (as most things in Communist China are) by committee.

Sorry, Wallaroo.

Yours truly,

The wolfish,

Wanderer

User avatar
Wallaroo_Blacke
Regular Poster
Posts: 196
Joined: Fri Jan 01, 1999 4:00 pm
Location: -Location Withheld- in Texas
Contact:

Post by Wallaroo_Blacke »

Thanks for tellin' me, Wanderer.

I kinda figured I was rambling.

User avatar
The JAM
Cartoon Hero
Posts: 2281
Joined: Fri Jan 01, 1999 4:00 pm
Location: Somewhere in Mexico...
Contact:

Post by The JAM »

And now China has the 4-2-1 problem. One adult now has to take care of his/her 2 parents AND 4 grandparents. So much for Chinese ingenuity...

Post Reply