I just read the first page of the timecube deal. And I have to say, the author is inhertently wrong by his own logic.
No self-respecting (much less hubristic [is that even a wrod?]) scientist will saimply say "I am right, this the is correct standard of Time", without even presenting what his standard is beyond "Four simoluanteous 24-hour roations".
Midnight does not occure simoulanteously with midday, as sunset and sunrise do not occur simoulatenously.
Nor do the latter even occur directly opposite moonset and moonrise.
Additionally, sunset/sunrise and moonset/moonrise do not repeat on a constant temporal scale. Where sunset today was 1853, sunset tomorrow may very well be 1854, as such providing a 24-hour and one minuete rotation. Conversly, sunset could occur at 1852, resulting in a 23-hour and 59-minuete rotation.
Also, his -1(-1)=-(-1) therom is completely debunked. "-1" does not, mathematicall read as "negetive one", but "the opposite of one". He himself, mentions that the mingling of opposites (man and woman to create child), produces an entity. So, the opposite times the opposite creates the entity, in this case, one.
Falling victim to singularity, himself, the author quite wrongly believes that every human being in America worships Christ as God. I know for a fact, I do not, so how can I be group with the singular mass which worships the "queer Jew God" and therefore needs to be executed.
for someone who spent thirty years and a quarter million dollars, as he claims, he sure spends little time attempting to disprove his hypothesis.
Any reasonable scientist's duty is to debunk their own hypothesis, not prove it. When looking for proof, even the tiniest bit of evidence on your behalf completely negates all evidence to the contrary, becuase you ignore the contrary.
I'm going to stop now, before I compose an essay.
"Justice is the Art of the Thief"
"Weapons and armor are for those who lack skill, Honor and courage"
~Drunken Monk to a Paladin in the tavern. No bystanders were harmed in the ensuing brawl~