Sheesh. Wait two hours for a comment and then a huge pile tumbles in all at once.

- Joel Fagin
Yeah yeah, this one. It's great. If this name is not used by Keen, it must be used by someone. Anyone want to start a webcomic collective?Eunice_P wrote:I like this design. Especially the way you design the C and G as the logo. Truly stylish.Joel Fagin wrote:
Overly special effectsy but I think it suits it.
When will the actual name change take place anyway?
It is some professional work.Joel Fagin wrote:
Overly special effectsy but I think it suits it.
Edit 1: Faub, if you like, you can email your design to me. I'll host it. joelfagin at hotmail dot com.
Edit 2: Slightly different version doodled in an attempt to avoid drawing my next comic. Attempt 100% sucessfull.
And suddenly we have a halo-motif instead of an atom. Alas, we lose the stylised initials.
- Joel Fagin
I do get paid for creating logos like that!tangho wrote:It is some professional work.
Do you know I could earn $200 for creating simple logo like this?
I didn't know who made this logo when I replied. I just recognized the professional quality in that design. I knew it wasn't pulled out of a hat in a second. Making an Adobe Illustrator file from a hand drawn image, would take me an hour. (Another thing I got tire of being a professional graphic artist.)Joel Fagin wrote: I do get paid for creating logos like that!Also teaching students how to create logos almost like that but not as good or else I'd have too much competition.
Actually, it's mostly a hobby since I doodle logos and websites and things when I'm bored. I take any job that happens my way but I usually don't go hunting for them. Being a lecturer gives me more free time to write and comic than graphic design would.
- Joel Fagin
I really like this one. The atom would be a very nice symbol for Comicgen.Joel Fagin wrote:
Overly special effectsy but I think it suits it.
- Joel Fagin
It might be partially that I designed it on a black background. Depending which forum skin you're using, you could be getting a great deal of glare and having a glowy thing in the middle doesn't help that.Leko wrote:Joel, I love the design, but it's a bit hard to look at. Too cluttered? Maybe tone down the glow a bit? Or add a contrasting color? I dunno, but when I look at it, my eyes can't decide where to go first. It's confusing.
Only in print, I think. I mean, whatever logo we end up with will be used mainly on the web and colour and complexity are both very cheap indeed on the web.Kirb wrote:I'm assuming we would have to use a flat version in most cases, though. Minus the glow, I mean.
You have comepletely and seriously sold me on Comic Genesis as being the name if that is now our logo.Joel Fagin wrote:
- Joel Fagin
Ah yes, I think I like it better flat. Not to say the glow didn't look nice as well.Joel Fagin wrote:
In retrospect, I really should've just put that up to start with, actually.
- Joel Fagin
Oh, good. I use subSilver as well and I did notice a glare problem when I first put it up. It's the rapidly changing contrast from light, to the black background, to glowiness. Your eyes dont know what light level to adapt to and they get stressed.*Leko wrote:I'm using Subsilver. That could be it. Light background + glowy things = ow.
Now that it's in black and white, you may be right. The connecting bars look like they might be a bit thick.Leko wrote:I like the black and white one, but the text is still hard for me to read. Maybe it's because Genesis is all connected? I dunno.![]()