Czar wrote:What? A blank vote is not a valid vote?
I'm abstaining then.
If it's not 'Mr.Bob','The Neko' or 'Nanda', it gets counted as spoiled way, I gave a second chance to those who put 'Vote' before I changed the first post of this thread to bold the SUBJECT LINE
FYI the list is for YOU people to spot usernames you don't recognize. The one with the lowest post count is snail at 17, so none of these are zero posters.
There should be about 61 now, however there is not enough to call it for any of the candidates. Need 10 more before one of the candidates has a snowballs chance in hell of winning. And that's assuming the next 10 people all vote the same.
CGVoteBox wrote:There should be about 61 now, however there is not enough to call it for any of the candidates. Need 10 more before one of the candidates has a snowballs chance in hell of winning. And that's assuming the next 10 people all vote the same.
Huh. That must mean that the original ballot box, even though it was stuffed, had a fairly accurate count.
Here we stand, here we fall; history don't care at all. Make the bed, light the light; Lady Mercy won't be home tonight.
if you're not on that list, that means you're sending your PM wrong (either putting Vote in the subject line or spelling the canidate's forum name wrong)
Sortelli wrote:Jesus Fucking Christ this affair has become completely ridiculous.
become?
-D. M. Jeftinija Pharm.D., Ph.D. -- Yes, I've got two doctorates and I'm arrogant about it, what have *you* done with *your* life?
"People who don't care about anything will never understand the people who do." "yeah.. but we won't care."
"Legostar's on the first page of the guide. His opinion is worth more than both of yours."--Yeahduff
There was some amusement to be had before, but I'm not jumping through any more goddamn hoops for the Jokey Joke Election Of No Consequence. I'm pretty sure visiting a forum with this much anal is not something I should be doing from work.
Sortelli wrote:There was some amusement to be had before, but I'm not jumping through any more goddamn hoops for the Jokey Joke Election Of No Consequence. I'm pretty sure visiting a forum with this much anal is not something I should be doing from work.
I did say "wow is this silly" back on page one.
You captured the silliness of it all well.
Crossfire: "Thank you! That explains it very nicely, and in a language that someone other than a physicist can understand..."
Denial is not falsification. You can't avoid a fact just because you don't like it.
"Data" is not the plural of "anecdote"