Re: The freakish size of Nancy Reagan's head.
Posted: Tue Sep 09, 2008 5:22 am
that's what worries me.Yeahduff wrote:You ain't seen nothing.
All are welcome to join the fun.
http://forums.comicgenesis.com/
that's what worries me.Yeahduff wrote:You ain't seen nothing.
Ahaugen wrote:a little history on the woman whom McZombie chose to be his VP from The Seattle Times
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/p ... in070.html
scary stuff
Hey, that sounds surprisingly like another politician I know of...The Frontiersman ran blistering editorials, condemning Palin's philosophy "that either we are with her or against her."
Ugh, I don't like The Frontiersman.KWill wrote:The Frontiersman ran blistering editorials, condemning Palin's philosophy "that either we are with her or against her."
Clinton had his share of scandals too.Mr.Bob wrote:If I could be an American politician I'd be a Republican.
Those guys can do whatever the hell they like and still keep their jobs.
Sure, but it does make the point that McCain's tenure in office (or his premature death and Palin's tenure in office) will be more of the same divisiveness that we had under Bush. Either McCain lacks the spine or power to stand up to the Busheviks in the GOP, or he's really bad at picking VP candidates (considering that Palin fought for the Bridge to Nowhere while McCain fought against it, though now she says otherwise).Jesusabdullah wrote:Ugh, I don't like The Frontiersman.Its editorials are pretty good when it comes to local issues, though. Really, I guess I just find it stale? *shrug*
you gotta be careful of those babies, if you don't bite their heads off first, they'll bite yours.The Neko wrote:The sad thing is that even if McCain ate a baby live on TV, they'd somehow be able to spin it in such a way as to make the voting public think it was a good thing and not in any way contradictory to their pro-life message.
The baby was obviously a terrorist.The Neko wrote:The sad thing is that even if McCain ate a baby live on TV, they'd somehow be able to spin it in such a way as to make the voting public think it was a good thing and not in any way contradictory to their pro-life message.
I read that the McCain campaign is now running an ad saying Palin was against "the bridge to nowhere", when in fact she was for it, and the project was stopped by Congress. Are the US media picking up on this sort of thing?Yeahduff wrote:It's more Palin then McCain who's made of teflon. Effectively she's the top billing, she's the one they're excited about.
Read some of the transcripts from her ABC interview. And yeah, she has no idea what the Bush Doctrine is.
Horrifying candidate.
She took the money and built the access road if my memory serves.Yeahduff wrote:Yes, but nobody cares.
Mother fucker said it herself at the convention, just an unabashed, bald-faced, liar.
edit/ Also, for those that don't know, SHE TOOK THE MONEY. She just spent it on something else when the controversy hit. Unbelievable Orwellian feat here.
My dear, there's a situation where I'd root for Medvedev.Mr.Bob wrote:I hear Roman Abramovich the former governor of Chukotka is going to challenge Medvedev in the nest Russian presidential election. His foreign policy credentials are fantastic! He lived right next to Alaska!
that was pretty much the only funny part of SNL last night.Prettysenshi wrote:I'm not a fan of SNL, but it was very funny tonight apparently. Tina Fey and Amy Poeler? teamed up to play Palin and Clinton. Hilarity.
http://www.youtube.com/v/9nMuR1TFq1s&hl=en&fs=1
If anyone wants to see it.