What's up with furries?

Topics which don't fit comfortably in any of the other forums go here. Spamming is not tolerated.
Forum rules
- Please use the forum attachment system for jam images, or link to the CG site specific to the Jam.
- Mark threads containing nudity in inlined images as NSFW
- Read The rules post for specifics
User avatar
Rock_dash
NOTHING
Posts: 2363
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2005 12:37 am

Post by Rock_dash »

YEAH YOU GUYS STOP HAVING A MEANINGFUL, WELL THOUGHT OUT CONVERSATION

GOD, SOME PEOPLE

User avatar
Prettysenshi
Bork Bork Bork
Posts: 2269
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2004 8:23 am
Location: Anywhere else but here....
Contact:

Post by Prettysenshi »

rkolter wrote:You are making a serious mountain out of a molehill. It's a silly, fluff comic about a furry society. It's not creepy and disturbing, unless you dwell too long on it.
It's not creepy? Explain.
No serious look is taken at their world because it is not a real world, and is only superficially treated as one. There's plenty of lawyers, but nobody sues over their daddy being eaten and his remains sold at a supermarket.
O_o

If you're not kidding, that's enough reason for me not to read that comic. I was curious what all the hubblub was about, but now, no way.

User avatar
McDuffies
Bob was here (Moderator)
Bob was here (Moderator)
Posts: 29957
Joined: Fri Jan 01, 1999 4:00 pm
Location: Serbia
Contact:

Post by McDuffies »

It is a disturbing comic indeed.Intelligent creatures eating each other is not a taboo for no reason. There's a reason why Coyote never gets Road Runner. One of K&K's main premises is to break this taboo, thus the comic is very consciously disturbing. Which is not really why I'd criticise it, I like disturbing when done well.

We dwell too long on it for sheer size of it's archives if nothing else.
There are reocurring themes that he hammers in with every storyline and by the time you're a few years into the comic, certain patterns are already established. There's other comics that do the same "intelligent animals eat each other" thing as K&K, but only K&K calls so loudly to interpret it this way. Why?

Perhaps it's because it's not exactly shallow fluff, it's goes deep halfway and then stops. If it's fluff, why does he go through the trouble of explaining why Kell doesn't eat Kevin? Why doesn't he just take that for granted and then focus on consequences, which are the actual fun part? But he tries to get analytic about their relationships, but when this causes contradictions with previously said things, he loses courage, backs away and returns to the fluff ground.
I don't buy the "fluff" theory. It sounds like beginner artist saying "that's my style".
Last edited by McDuffies on Wed Nov 14, 2007 6:55 pm, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
Prettysenshi
Bork Bork Bork
Posts: 2269
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2004 8:23 am
Location: Anywhere else but here....
Contact:

Post by Prettysenshi »

mcDuffies wrote:Uh... so what you're saying is basically that I'll like the comic if I stop thinking while I read it?
Are you asking me or Ryan?

User avatar
McDuffies
Bob was here (Moderator)
Bob was here (Moderator)
Posts: 29957
Joined: Fri Jan 01, 1999 4:00 pm
Location: Serbia
Contact:

Post by McDuffies »

Ha ha, I'm busted. :wink: Was asking Ryan but it's not what I actually wanted to say anyway,

User avatar
The Neko
A Blithe ray of Schadenfreude
Posts: 3878
Joined: Tue Mar 18, 2003 6:16 pm
Location: New York City

Post by The Neko »

mcDuffies wrote:If it's fluff, why does he go through the trouble of explaining why Kell doesn't eat Kevin?
True, if he never brought people's attention to it, people would have just assumed it was just a part of the immutable premise. But instead, it's just inviting people to question it. The more he defines of his universe, the worse it gets.

It's like... imagine Warner Bros. making a cartoon that explains biologically why Bugs can walk on two feet and talk, or why Elmer Fudd is somehow shorter than him. It brings your attention to what it's trying to explain away, which is contrary to the purpose of explaining it.

User avatar
Rkolter
Destroyer of Words (Moderator)
Destroyer of Words (Moderator)
Posts: 16399
Joined: Tue Jun 24, 2003 4:34 am
Location: It's equally probable that I'm everywhere.
Contact:

Post by Rkolter »

prettysenshi wrote:
mcDuffies wrote:Uh... so what you're saying is basically that I'll like the comic if I stop thinking while I read it?
Are you asking me or Ryan?
Heh. I'll answer it even though prettysenshi grabbed it before Mcduffies could edit it away, because it's a valid question -

Yes McDuffies - that is what I'm saying. I regularly watch movies and suspend my disbelief. I don't have a problem with not digging too deeply into K&K's world and just reading as I go. It's just not a serious comic.

I equate the rampant eating of each other in K&K to cartoon violence. It's done for comedic effect. You never see characters sobbing over the loss of a loved one due to predation because that's not what the comic emphasizes. Likewise, while Warner Bros could, and DID, make a cartoon showing what cartoon violence would really be like (Remember "Kill Da Rabbit"? I burst into tears as a little kid when I first saw that), they don't emphasize that aspect of cartoon violence.

K&K just isn't disturbing. It could be, if the artist went that direction. But, it isn't.
The Neko wrote:It's like... imagine Warner Bros. making a cartoon that explains biologically why Bugs can walk on two feet and talk, or why Elmer Fudd is somehow shorter than him. It brings your attention to what it's trying to explain away, which is contrary to the purpose of explaining it.
I really don't have an answer to this. It's a valid point. In hindsight, the whole domestication thing is a direction I didn't care for in K&K. But I don't think that (as an example) causes K&K to be a disturbing comic.
Image Image ImageImage
Crossfire: "Thank you! That explains it very nicely, and in a language that someone other than a physicist can understand..."

Denial is not falsification. You can't avoid a fact just because you don't like it.
"Data" is not the plural of "anecdote"

User avatar
McDuffies
Bob was here (Moderator)
Bob was here (Moderator)
Posts: 29957
Joined: Fri Jan 01, 1999 4:00 pm
Location: Serbia
Contact:

Post by McDuffies »

Heh. I'll answer it even though prettysenshi grabbed it before Mcduffies could edit it away, because it's a valid question -

Yes McDuffies - that is what I'm saying. I regularly watch movies and suspend my disbelief. I don't have a problem with not digging too deeply into K&K's world and just reading as I go. It's just not a serious comic.
It's not really a good question, I edited it out for the reason that I answered it to myself seconds later. But I don't think that it applies to K&K because I don't think that K&K acts like fluff all the time - at times we're presented with consequences of such world, and at other times, when things get too complicated for author, that's avoided. We're invited to care about characters in a very dangerous world, but asked to act as if there's no danger for them. Sometimes we're asked to think, other times we're asked not to think. The problem is, simply, the comic is not consistent in being shallow.

For me, the main problem with the whole social darvinism is so strongly present in the comic that I actually have to keep reminding myself that it's all just a harmless fluffy comic. I end up actually thinking more.
I would have seriously thought that I'm thinking too much into this, but since there are several people having same thoughts independently from me, I can only conclude that we noticed something that is actively present in the comic and not just in our imaginations.

User avatar
Datachasers
Regular Poster
Posts: 230
Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2007 7:54 am
Location: in hell ( pheonix AZ )
Contact:

Post by Datachasers »

Dr Neo Lao wrote:Considering the stigma some people put on furry comics, I wonder if anyone has made a CGI furry comic?

Or gone for a CGI, fanfic furry comic for the trifecta of "most hated"? :D
yes its called "changes" and no i dont have a link.... poser 4 ( i think thats what hes/She useing . :D i dont read it but ive seen it ...

:ick:
Anyone who considers protocol unimportant has never dealt with a cat.
-- R. Heinlein
Image
Image

User avatar
MixedMyth
Cartoon Villain
Posts: 6319
Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2002 4:00 pm
Location: Niether here nor there
Contact:

Post by MixedMyth »

Could be worse. What if it were a sprite comic? :wink:
ImageImage Mixed Myth
Etsy Shop- for masks and gamer greeting cards

User avatar
Mvmarcz
Cartoon Hero
Posts: 3623
Joined: Wed Jul 21, 2004 10:17 pm
Location: Louisiana
Contact:

Post by Mvmarcz »

that's it we need a furry sprite comic RIGHT NOW
Image
NJ: "You know the drill, you're AWESOME!"
I am the artist formerly known as M2

User avatar
Rkolter
Destroyer of Words (Moderator)
Destroyer of Words (Moderator)
Posts: 16399
Joined: Tue Jun 24, 2003 4:34 am
Location: It's equally probable that I'm everywhere.
Contact:

Post by Rkolter »

mvmarcz wrote:that's it we need a furry sprite comic RIGHT NOW
With lots of yiffing and vore.
Image Image ImageImage
Crossfire: "Thank you! That explains it very nicely, and in a language that someone other than a physicist can understand..."

Denial is not falsification. You can't avoid a fact just because you don't like it.
"Data" is not the plural of "anecdote"

User avatar
MixedMyth
Cartoon Villain
Posts: 6319
Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2002 4:00 pm
Location: Niether here nor there
Contact:

Post by MixedMyth »

rkolter wrote:
mvmarcz wrote:that's it we need a furry sprite comic RIGHT NOW
With lots of yiffing and vore.
The funniest part is that you probably couldn't even tell but for the word baloons.
ImageImage Mixed Myth
Etsy Shop- for masks and gamer greeting cards

User avatar
Jim North
Cartoon Hero
Posts: 6659
Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2003 10:55 pm
Location: The Omnipresent Here
Contact:

Post by Jim North »

rkolter wrote:
mvmarcz wrote:that's it we need a furry sprite comic RIGHT NOW
With lots of yiffing and vore.
That's, like, 75% of Sonic the Hedgehog sprite comics.

At least.
Existence is a series of catastrophes through which everything barely but continually survives.

User avatar
Sharkfin
Regular Poster
Posts: 125
Joined: Sun Oct 22, 2006 10:22 pm
Location: Powder Springs, Georgia
Contact:

taking K&K way too seriously

Post by Sharkfin »

I think some of you are taking K&K way too seriously. Please don’t forget: It’s only a comic strip. What are you going to do next? Try to figure out how snoopy can sleep on top of a peak roofed dog house without falling off?

Bill Holbrook lives here in Norcross Georgia not more than 30 miles from me. I actually see him at least once a month at our cartoonist get-together. And from the times I’ve talked with him, I don’t get the filling that he’s being malicious at all. He’s come up with a cast of exaggerated characters, and he’s trying to bend their circumstances to form a funny outcome. Just like any other comic strip artist does.

If you guys really want I can print this thread off and ask him about it next time I see him.

While I’ve got everyone’s attention, will someone please write something in my comic’s forum.
Come see my webcomic!!
Image

User avatar
The Mortician
Cartoon Hero
Posts: 1705
Joined: Tue Mar 28, 2006 7:59 pm
Contact:

Post by The Mortician »

Meh. Fanatics on any subject are crazy no matter what.

User avatar
The Neko
A Blithe ray of Schadenfreude
Posts: 3878
Joined: Tue Mar 18, 2003 6:16 pm
Location: New York City

Re: taking K&K way too seriously

Post by The Neko »

Sharkfin wrote: While I’ve got everyone’s attention, will someone please write something in my comic’s forum.
Image
jag saknar självförtroende

User avatar
Mvmarcz
Cartoon Hero
Posts: 3623
Joined: Wed Jul 21, 2004 10:17 pm
Location: Louisiana
Contact:

Post by Mvmarcz »

This thread isn't just about K&K THAT thread is in GD.
This thread is just about the explanation and analysis of a genre
Image
NJ: "You know the drill, you're AWESOME!"
I am the artist formerly known as M2

User avatar
Kisai
Goddess of Light
Goddess of Light
Posts: 3276
Joined: Fri Jan 01, 1999 4:00 pm
Location: The Past, the Present, The future
Contact:

Post by Kisai »

datachasers wrote:
Dr Neo Lao wrote:Considering the stigma some people put on furry comics, I wonder if anyone has made a CGI furry comic?

Or gone for a CGI, fanfic furry comic for the trifecta of "most hated"? :D
yes its called "changes" and no i dont have a link.... poser 4 ( i think thats what hes/She useing . :D i dont read it but ive seen it ...

:ick:
Give me 5 minutes, I can find the one on CG before it abrubtly ended.

Oh hay... there's two.
http://threedcomics.keenspace.com (2005) -> http://imago-comics.com/
http://smithstone.comicgenesis.com/ (warning, adult, 2003)

And nearly everything made in poser... looks the same.

User avatar
Birdie
Keeps telling everyone stuff
Posts: 813
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2003 2:50 am
Location: With your mom
Contact:

Post by Birdie »

Jim North wrote:
rkolter wrote:
mvmarcz wrote:that's it we need a furry sprite comic RIGHT NOW
With lots of yiffing and vore.
That's, like, 75% of Sonic the Hedgehog sprite comics.

At least.
what about? http://sff.comicgenesis.com I'm still a bit confused on what makes a comic furry... but it's kind of like a furry sprite comic right?
"I find the first strip on this site incredibly offensive and awful" - Scott Kurtz
SuperFightFight More Filling than Douche Juice!

Locked