Page 5 of 5

Posted: Wed Jun 07, 2006 10:58 pm
by Christwriter
You know, I read somewhere that there is a (heavily supported by documentation) theory that that particular part of Revelations got mistranslated? Apparently, it could have been either 666 or 616.

Now it looks like it's 616.

So the Day of evil was either the first of the month or January, depending on how you date the year.

CW

Posted: Wed Jun 07, 2006 11:32 pm
by Nyke
The Neko wrote:Wasn't the whole 6/6/06 thing moot to begin with since the real number of the beast is 616?
No.

And 2000 was the new millenium!

Seriously.

Posted: Wed Jun 07, 2006 11:47 pm
by Toxic
DarkMagician wrote:
The Neko wrote:Wasn't the whole 6/6/06 thing moot to begin with since the real number of the beast is 616?
No.

And 2000 was the new millenium!

Seriously.
*cough*millennium*cough*