Newer. Nakeder. Shinier. Nakeder. Did I mention nakeder?

[AlmightyPyro] · Post by **[AlmightyPyro]** » Fri Jan 20, 2006 9:32 pm

mcDuffies wrote:NFWS

WOW~ That's really good! that's the best art I've ever seen of yours! *gives McDuffies the rest of laura's cookies*

Mr.Bob · Post by **Mr.Bob** » Sat Jan 21, 2006 4:21 am

mcDuffies wrote:...my name escapes her.

McDuffies · Post by **McDuffies** » Sat Jan 21, 2006 5:32 am

I say funniest stuff even if I don't intend to.
Specially when I don't intend to.

McDuffies · Post by **McDuffies** » Sat Jan 21, 2006 4:22 pm

Since Pyro was so giddy about it, here's the rest of that session:

NSFW1
NSFW2

Post by **Kisai** » Sat Jan 21, 2006 7:43 pm

rkolter wrote:
KittyKatBlack wrote:There shall be no naked thread without me. Commandment 11. Look it up.

BTW, Happy New Year from me and my new tablet. ^_^
How do you do that 3-d effect with the Guilty by Design logo? :o

I think your monitor's red is overdriven, time for a new monitor yo. Or maybe the cable is damaged.

[AlmightyPyro] · Post by **[AlmightyPyro]** » Sat Jan 21, 2006 9:36 pm

mcDuffies wrote:Since Pyro was so giddy about it, here's the rest of that session:

NSFW1
NSFW2

Thats DAMN good!

Sincerely · Post by **Sincerely** » Sat Jan 21, 2006 11:24 pm

It feels kind of weird to me, that in each pic the linewidth increases the further down the picture you go... I can't tell if it was intentional or not, but it just looks odd in my mind.

Otherwise, the proportions seem spot on and the faces are really clean and believable. I like.

Turi · Post by **Turi** » Sun Jan 22, 2006 3:43 am

I don't know if Duffies use it intentionally, but I do. It gives a sensation of solidity and is good for non-action poses; just like in action poses, thickening the lines of the action part gives weight.

Reinder · Post by **Reinder** » Sun Jan 22, 2006 8:17 am

Nah, it's just McDuffies' ink sinking to the bottom. If you leave that panel alone for a few more days the lines at the top will vanish.

McDuffies · Post by **McDuffies** » Sun Jan 22, 2006 8:54 am

sincerely wrote:It feels kind of weird to me, that in each pic the linewidth increases the further down the picture you go... I can't tell if it was intentional or not, but it just looks odd in my mind.

Otherwise, the proportions seem spot on and the faces are really clean and believable. I like.

It'd be very unfair from me not to make it clear that drawings were based tightly on a reference. I can never get that level of realism when working out of my head.

The line width is because I tend to use thinner line to work with details. The most important part of the drawing is, I think, face, and further from the face, the line gets thicker and the strokes longer and more free,

PieceOfSkunk · Post by **PieceOfSkunk** » Thu Jan 26, 2006 5:54 am

Quick! Before it becomes thread necromancy!

Tasteful, but NSFW

Jim North · Post by **Jim North** » Thu Jan 26, 2006 3:50 pm

NSFW 1
NSFW 2
NSFW 3

The third one is actually pretty safe, but better NSFW than sorry.

[AlmightyPyro] · Post by **[AlmightyPyro]** » Thu Jan 26, 2006 7:23 pm

it's always cool to revive the naked thread!

Warren · Post by **Warren** » Thu Jan 26, 2006 7:35 pm

Jim North wrote: NSFW 2

Check, and mate!

Jim North · Post by **Jim North** » Thu Jan 26, 2006 10:58 pm

Strip chess is awesome, especially if you take a long time to study your opponent's boobs.

I mean, moves.

Warren · Post by **Warren** » Fri Jan 27, 2006 6:31 am

I will have to remember that.

McDuffies · Post by **McDuffies** » Sat Jan 28, 2006 2:33 am

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v91/a ... /dita1.gif

Warren · Post by **Warren** » Sat Jan 28, 2006 6:32 am

mcDuffies wrote:http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v91/a ... /dita1.gif

She kinda scares me.

Nutcracker · Post by **Nutcracker** » Sat Jan 28, 2006 6:40 am

Where do you find reference photos?

Warren · Post by **Warren** » Sat Jan 28, 2006 6:56 am

I think he hangs out with a lot of models.