Page 2 of 3
Posted: Sun Aug 07, 2005 5:46 pm
by Rkolter
Just another intelligent design whacko. I mean really. If there were an omnipotent superbeing made of spaghetti, then it logically follows that he must have a nemesis, being an ultra-large and unbendy fork.
Such a fork would be easily detectable simply be designing a large napkin, knife, and spoon. It would be unquestionably attracted to such a placesetting.
Yet we have NO EVIDENCE for this giant fork whatsoever, despite having created quite large napkins, spoons, and knives.
You cannot have a one sided coin, and you cannot have an omnipotent superbeing without having a nemesis. Thus, no fork, no spaghetti monster.
Posted: Sun Aug 07, 2005 6:37 pm
by ShineDog
this is the best thing ever.
in fact, check out the rest of the site, every link is funny, and everything is 100% fact.
Uh . . .
Posted: Sun Aug 07, 2005 6:42 pm
by VileTerror
Kolter, simply because <i>you</i> have not seen the Fork of Woes, does not mean She does not exist. She is a crafty one, let me tell you. Her greatest accomplishment was convincing people such as yourself that She doesn't exist.
Posted: Sun Aug 07, 2005 8:30 pm
by Rianeva
rkolter wrote:Just another intelligent design whacko. I mean really. If there were an omnipotent superbeing made of spaghetti, then it logically follows that he must have a nemesis, being an ultra-large and unbendy fork.
Such a fork would be easily detectable simply be designing a large napkin, knife, and spoon. It would be unquestionably attracted to such a placesetting.
Yet we have NO EVIDENCE for this giant fork whatsoever, despite having created quite large napkins, spoons, and knives.
You cannot have a one sided coin, and you cannot have an omnipotent superbeing without having a nemesis. Thus, no fork, no spaghetti monster.
Obviously there is not a napkin, knife, and spoon large enough to attract the fork you speak of.
Posted: Sun Aug 07, 2005 8:34 pm
by Ian Moulding
The fork of Woes is cunning, and is not fooled by your simplistic attempts to capture Her with shiny place settings. I fear for you, rkolter, for you have obviously fallen prey to Her wiles.
Posted: Sun Aug 07, 2005 10:35 pm
by Crazy Chris
Where does parmesan cheese fit into this?
Posted: Mon Aug 08, 2005 9:49 am
by ManyWorlds
I still say that the hate of ninja is proof that this can't possibly be true.
Ninja > Pirates
And Ninja > Samurai, except when there's only one Samurai.
Don't ask why it's like that, but one samurai is more powerful than multiple ninja -- and that is the only[/b[ situation in which samurai beat ninja.
Posted: Mon Aug 08, 2005 10:12 am
by Rkolter
Oh come on. Ninja suck.
As a pirate, you get to drink, have cool swordfights with lots of swinging, brag loudly, and have at least two wenches in your bed every day.
With ninja you get what... black pajamas? Bah.
*sings loudly and off key with a wench on each arm*
Posted: Mon Aug 08, 2005 10:17 am
by ManyWorlds
"Black Pajamas" are only for the stupid ninjas that conform to stereotypes. Real ninja wear whatever they want.
And ninja can conceal themselves in girls' bedrooms and showers with little effort, whereas pirates actually have to WORK for their wenches.
Besides, chicks in ninja outfits = teh hawt.
Posted: Mon Aug 08, 2005 10:24 am
by Rkolter
Yeah, but the girl ninjas always fall for the guy they're supposed to kill, and never for the other ninjas, no matter how cool they may be.
And besides, concealing yourself in their bedrooms or bathrooms? That's just creepy.

Posted: Mon Aug 08, 2005 3:51 pm
by Sortelli
Kolter has a point. I feel myself being drawn across the pirate/ninja divide.
BAH!
Posted: Tue Aug 09, 2005 7:48 am
by VileTerror
Ninjas and pirates are both inconsequential compared to the awesome might o- . . . oh bother. *sighs* I'm just not feeling inspired any more.
Let's burn somebody.
Posted: Tue Aug 09, 2005 10:39 am
by DJMayhem
I'm laughing too much to contribute anything useful to the debate.
Re: BAH!
Posted: Tue Aug 09, 2005 12:43 pm
by Ida
VileTerror wrote:Ninjas and pirates are both inconsequential compared to the awesome might o- . . . oh bother. *sighs* I'm just not feeling inspired any more.
Let's burn somebody.
Vampires. Ninja vampires, that is.
Posted: Tue Aug 09, 2005 12:54 pm
by Psiogen
rkolter wrote:You cannot have a one sided coin ...
What about a M
Posted: Tue Aug 09, 2005 12:55 pm
by Ida
... Is that an eyepatch she's wearing as a bra? Damn, you're slowly dragging me to the dark side.
Posted: Tue Aug 09, 2005 1:00 pm
by Crazy Chris
Is she wearing that because there's no nipple underneath?
Mmhmm.
Posted: Tue Aug 09, 2005 2:31 pm
by VileTerror
That is correct, Chris. All that's under that nipplepatch is a gruesome, gaping, bloody hole, with little bits of flesh and mammary tissue hanging out.
Personally, I wish she wouldn't wear the blasted thing. Covering up such beauty should be a crime.
Posted: Tue Aug 09, 2005 2:46 pm
by CJBurgandy
1: Pirate be far bett'r than Ninja, thar for, this here ther'y be alright by me.
2: Do Pitchforks count as giant forks? or this:
Edit:
I also found a
giant fork in the roadand
A fork and flag and a sculpture that looks so wrong I can't help but
to randomly link it
Ah:
Posted: Tue Aug 09, 2005 2:53 pm
by VileTerror
New inspiration! Le wootage in a tree!
<small>ahem</small>
Pitchforks are actually idols of the Fork of Woes created by the secretive Cult of the Damned Forking. This group of foul heretics believe that His Mighty Pastaness is a fel god that only the Carrier of Infinite Fodder (as the cultists foolishly call their silverware god) can destroy. His Mighty Pastaness has not wiped these morons from the face of existence only because He believes no one is past redemption . . . until the Rectuming.
No doubt the woman in that image you provided is one of these cultists.