Page 3 of 3

Posted: Thu Nov 24, 2005 5:02 am
by CorpAmis
Welll....I guess not...I have had bad experiences with musicals.

Posted: Thu Nov 24, 2005 6:52 am
by War
Image

Posted: Thu Nov 24, 2005 9:36 am
by Nutcracker
War wrote:Image
Yes.
poor Pilly...

Posted: Thu Nov 24, 2005 9:59 am
by Subhuman
I remember when the play came out, I thought it looked so quintessentially, cloyingly Gen-X. And we all know how well the '90s have aged.

I probably won't see the movie because I heard it sucked, but it might be worth a Rental. (LOL)

Posted: Thu Nov 24, 2005 10:14 am
by Vorticus
I may go see it. I haven't seen it before now, so it's a good a time as any to see it.

Posted: Thu Nov 24, 2005 1:59 pm
by Mr.Bob
Nutcracker wrote:
War wrote:Image
Yes.
poor Pilly...
Let that be a lesson to future thread necromancers!!

Posted: Thu Nov 24, 2005 2:22 pm
by Pillywiggin
Mr.Bob wrote:Let that be a lesson to future thread necromancers!!
*shrug*

Half the people on the board weren't even planning on seeing it so I didn't want to start another thread about it. Yesterday was opening day in the states so it seemed relevant. :P

Posted: Thu Nov 24, 2005 6:23 pm
by Polkadot
Black Sparrow wrote:
Pillywiggin wrote:
cjburgandy wrote:hey, I think the person playing Angel in the movie is the same person who played Angel in the original broadway cast... I could be wrong though. I'll look at my CD when I get home.
Angel, Roger, Mark, Collins, Benny and Maureen are all the same from the original broadway production.

That's everyone except Mimi and Joanne. :o
The Mimi thing is a real bummer, though. She really had an awesome stage presence....

**Is NOT a Rent and Phantom of the Opera geek. Really.**

Okay... Maybe a little...
at least they got Adina Menzel, she should be pretty good. I didnt know roger was original cast too, cool.
i'm seeing it tomorrow with a whole bunch of my theatre friends, yay!