Well, would you look at the time.

Avatar007 · Post by **Avatar007** » Fri May 05, 2006 8:16 pm

grabmygoblin wrote:it's for the new exorcist film.

I think it's actually for the remake of "The Omen".

Not that I mean to split hairs or anything.

ChibiJess · Post by **ChibiJess** » Fri May 05, 2006 8:19 pm

I can't wait till 2045. January 23, 2045 will read, when written out in the American form:

01/23/45.
(That'll be my 58th birthday)

Jim North · Post by **Jim North** » Fri May 05, 2006 9:31 pm

avatar007 wrote:
grabmygoblin wrote:it's for the new exorcist film.
I think it's actually for the remake of "The Omen".

Yup, it's The Omen. We've got the trailers for it running at my theater.

Grabmygoblin · Post by **Grabmygoblin** » Sat May 06, 2006 9:09 am

Jim North wrote:
avatar007 wrote:
grabmygoblin wrote:it's for the new exorcist film.
I think it's actually for the remake of "The Omen".
Yup, it's The Omen. We've got the trailers for it running at my theater.

oh yeah, whoops.

Ian Moulding · Post by **Ian Moulding** » Sat May 06, 2006 8:17 pm

Speaking of time... I've always been annoyed by how easy and convenient it is to read a watch. Analog watches have great big arrows pointing directly at simple numbers, while digital clocks have a simple-to-read hours:minutes:seconds format. What I really want is a watch that's hard to read and only gives me the time in five-minute intervals.

Avatar007 · Post by **Avatar007** » Sat May 06, 2006 8:54 pm

That watch is messed up. Although there's apparently red LED's that light up to tell you the remaining minute-accuracy.

Tim · Post by **Tim** » Sat May 06, 2006 8:56 pm

Yeah, just about as messed up as clocks that show the time in binary, or the Alien Clock.

Tellurider · Post by **Tellurider** » Sat May 06, 2006 9:43 pm

I always think it's funny when people refer to light years as units of time.

Or maybe that alien clock is designed for far-flung space travel.

Nah, they probably just used "light years" wrong.

Jim North · Post by **Jim North** » Sat May 06, 2006 9:45 pm

Tellurider wrote:Nah, they probably just used "light years" wrong.

Yah, they've been using it wrong for parsecs now.

Dave Against The Machine · Sat May 06, 2006 9:51 pm

I have an analog watch with no numbers. Just the hands, and dots at the 5, 10 15, so on. The way most analog fossil watches are. Anyways, I was at someone house, and a girl looks at my watch and asks me, how can you tell the time with no numbers. There is a sad part to this story. The sad part is. This girl was 17.

Tellurider · Post by **Tellurider** » Sat May 06, 2006 9:53 pm

Don't worry, Dave. Girls like that usually find someone to start up their baby factory early on.

Which breeds more special people... hmm.

On second thought, worry.

Ahaugen · Post by **Ahaugen** » Sat May 06, 2006 10:38 pm

i do believe that there is a sound effect for those kinds of people