pzambert wrote:congrats, mark; you've lowered my standards.
A day's work well done. Well, maybe a couple hours' work. Okay, so it's not so much work as fooling around. A couple hours' fooling around well done. Well, adequately done.
pzambert wrote:btw, the red light is supposed to be on top. even england has that right, though i can't vouch for australia.
I don't know what you're talking about. Also, I fixed that before you posted.
entrophy wrote:A day's work well done. Well, maybe a couple hours' work. Okay, so it's not so much work as fooling around. A couple hours' fooling around well done. Well, adequately done.
yeah, i was gonna say work had nothing to do w/it. at least, not very much...
entrophy wrote:I don't know what you're talking about. Also, I fixed that before you posted.
uh huh... and it took me a little while to actually post. so there!
pzam
"i like to give the impression that i don't fornicate with inanimate objects" -nate
Sparafucile wrote:Do you actually wear your watch on your right wrist, Mark? I remembered someone other than me did that, but I thought it was Derek.
I used to, but I stopped when I started using a mouse consistantly. You might say I'm a switch-watcher. Which is like a swatch-watcher, except without the different fabric examples.
miesl wrote:People wear watches on wrists other than the right? *pokes at delusion bubble* Huh.
i know a set of twins that both wear it on their right, even though one is left-handed and the other right.
most right-handed people wear it on their left.
pzam
"i like to give the impression that i don't fornicate with inanimate objects" -nate