Posted: Wed Aug 16, 2006 2:00 am
Rokas: Well, from an evolutionary standpoint, cows have a sweet deal. They get raised, fed, and have lots of calves. Then they die. Much less disease, predation, starvation, etc. than their wild ancestors.
All are welcome to join the fun.
http://forums.comicgenesis.com/
That's one way of looking at it -- the most successful adaptation there is in today's world is to be valuable to humans, and be easily domesticatable. There are more domestic cattle, more widely spread, then there ever were aurocs.nick012000 wrote:Rokas: Well, from an evolutionary standpoint, cows have a sweet deal. They get raised, fed, and have lots of calves. Then they die. Much less disease, predation, starvation, etc. than their wild ancestors.
Not quite, actually. The genes are still there, and I understand they've been bred back to a small herd somewhere. But they're not extinct in the biological sense anyway, since they've left plenty of descendants. Same with horses, and with wolves; if the wild ones get wiped out somehow, there's still plenty of domesticated ones.MikeVanPelt wrote:That's one way of looking at it -- the most successful adaptation there is in today's world is to be valuable to humans, and be easily domesticatable. There are more domestic cattle, more widely spread, then there ever were aurocs.nick012000 wrote:Rokas: Well, from an evolutionary standpoint, cows have a sweet deal. They get raised, fed, and have lots of calves. Then they die. Much less disease, predation, starvation, etc. than their wild ancestors.
On the other hand, aurocs (wild cattle) are extinct. They existed in Biblical times (the mentions of "wild bulls of Bashan" in Psalms are aurocs) but not any more. (Based on David's description, the wild ones were pretty vicious.)
An interesting idea, except for the Jewish thing... After all, Mohammed plagiarized Judism to create Islam (though he added lots of violence, and that whole teenage-wet-dream about the virgins, to help draw a paying crowd) so they hold to the same general dietary laws and restrictions...SolidusRaccoon wrote:And another idea, a great way to screen at the airport. Free complimentary bacon, each passenger must eat a slice before boarding.
Or have all the seats covered in pigskin leather, so every passenger would have to touch pig. That’s a big no no among the muslime freaks. So no matter how much of a “glorious” jihad death they die, they will still have had to touch pig. And that means one ticket to hell for them
The english author Richard Avery spoke about that in his short series, "The Expendables". One of the characters who didn't survive the novel he appeared in was Arabic, and when a crewmate sees Ahmad drinking alcohol and questions him on it, Ahmad replies that as an Expendable, he's doing something good for the whole of Mankind. Which means that he's doing something good for all of Islam (by default). And that his imam had given him advance permission to drink, wench, and party in return for the future services Ahmad would be giving to Islam.Kerry Skydancer wrote:It does. Muslim is a bully's religion - in addition to having carte blanche to beat up or lie to non-Muslims, there is no requirement to behave honorably when you're outnumbered. Where a Christian or Jewish fanatic could probably be caught by the expedient of asking him to desecrate his own religious symbols, a Muslim automatically gets dispensation to do whatever cowardly thing is needed to infiltrate the enemy. So unfortunately, the self-desecration ideas -also- assume that they think the way we do... which they don't.
I won't break a religious fast for a flight check and that's pretty much every Wednesday or Friday for eastern apostolic christians (Orthodox Church and Byzantine Catholic) plus great chunks of spring and winter for the pre-christmas and pre-easter fasts.SolidusRaccoon wrote:And another idea, a great way to screen at the airport. Free complimentary bacon, each passenger must eat a slice before boarding.
Or have all the seats covered in pigskin leather, so every passenger would have to touch pig. That’s a big no no among the muslime freaks. So no matter how much of a “glorious” jihad death they die, they will still have had to touch pig. And that means one ticket to hell for them
It very much depends on the jew, or more properly speaking, the section of judaism that a particular jew belongs to. Some of the very orthodox jews like satmars might have serious problems with pigskin leather.SolidusRaccoon wrote:That's why I had the second idea, While Jews are forbidden to eat pork, I think they can still have contact with pigskin for example. While Muslims acts like any form of pig is kryptonite. Remember the case where a Muslim threw a hissy fit over a figure of Piglet? Even looking at one is anathema to them.
What kinda gun you looking for?Madmoonie wrote:And I am dirt, bloody poor and can't afford one even if I wanted one.BrockthePaine wrote:The reason I prefer to carry a gun is because it is the Great Equalizer. When I am armed, I (all weakling 155lbs of me) is equal to the 280lb bodybuilding trackstar football-rushingback druggie drunken freak who wants my wallet and car keys. I am Equal.
I am not the sheep, I am the sheepdog.
(which I do actually.)