Just sayin,' I'm all for bein' a stickler to facts... But if you don't use your Artistic License sometimes, they revoke it.
Can't see latest update - can you?
- Kerry Skydancer
- Cartoon Hero
- Posts: 1346
- Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 6:03 pm
- Location: Bethlehem PA
- Contact:
- Earl McClaw
- Regular Poster
- Posts: 759
- Joined: Wed Nov 20, 2002 8:15 am
- Contact:
Maybe the orbit each other? Then as a pair they orbit Questworld? (Anybody care to work out the orbital mechanics and gravimetrics?)Kerry Skydancer wrote:Ralph seems to like the idea that they're in locked orbits, somehow... they always appear in the sky as paired crescents when we've seen them.
Earl McClaw invites you to visit Furryco and the DGL. (Avatar used with permission of Ralph Hayes, Jr.)
- Tom Mazanec
- Regular Poster
- Posts: 817
- Joined: Fri Jan 01, 1999 4:00 pm
- Location: Ohio
Actually, this would probably work. The best scenario would be for Airith to orbit a class G giant star...this would minimize perturbations on the system and make it more stable (as an astronomy major in college, this would bother me with issues over stellar evolution and biological evolution, but Ralph is a creationist IIRC). The problem is that Ralph said one orbits in ten days and one orbits in thirty days IIRC. Years would also have to be like weeks, just an arbitrary twelve months. Otherwise, a year would span a lifetime.
Forum Mongoose
- Tom Mazanec
- Regular Poster
- Posts: 817
- Joined: Fri Jan 01, 1999 4:00 pm
- Location: Ohio
If they use a solar calendar in my scenario, the years would last decades or even centuries. Giant stars are huge, but also almost as thin as air except at the center, so they only mass about as much as the sun would. That is why they would not perturb the Airith-forget the name-forget the other name system. The system would be way out there. It would cause a LONG time to orbit the sun, however.
Forum Mongoose
- Tom Mazanec
- Regular Poster
- Posts: 817
- Joined: Fri Jan 01, 1999 4:00 pm
- Location: Ohio