Posted: Tue Apr 04, 2006 12:30 pm
Hmm, as it turns out it's more like 'Your Honor the defendant is missing and presumed dead', but still shouldn't those the heirs of Quentin of Ridgedale and/or those they sold the land too be consider defendants too, since in effect their property (and all the current landowners in Freemans Down bought the land in good faith) is being taken from them?EdBecerra wrote:Kerry Skydancer wrote:
Y'r probably right about the lawyers - if it is indeed a case of someone slipping that by the judge ("Honest, Your Honor! We THOUGHT he wuz hiding! Really! It's a puny lil' village... that should count as hiding! Right?"), then once the facts come out and are made public, a judge somewhere is going to become very embarrassed and humiliated.
There are few things in the world more nasty than a justice who's been made to look stupid and ignorant. They tend to deeply resent it...