Welcome to Silvergate
- SolidusRaccoon
- Cartoon Hero
- Posts: 3046
- Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 6:15 pm
- Location: Outer Heaven
Still a high class area like that should have it fixeds ASAP. Put the lowlies to some use, lazy unionized bums.
Yes, sir. I agree completely. It takes a well-balanced individual... such as yourself to rule the world. No, sir. No one knows that you were the third one... Solidus. ...What should I do about the woman? Yes sir. I'll keep her under surveillance. Yes. Thank you. Good-bye...... Mr. President.
- Shyal_malkes
- Cartoon Hero
- Posts: 1804
- Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 10:12 am
- Contact:
- DragonMasterHawk
- Regular Poster
- Posts: 276
- Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2004 4:20 pm
- Contact:
And I still think the barmaid is an evil, sinister, conniving succubus with little to no redeeming qualities apart from shrieking like a banshee when Wildcard eventually opens her black, twisted heart.shyal_malkes wrote:but you know me, I still think the docter was the one keeping the rat king underground
Doesn't make it true...
- UncleMonty
- Cartoon Hero
- Posts: 1789
- Joined: Fri Jan 01, 1999 4:00 pm
-
Rich-online
- Regular Poster
- Posts: 27
- Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2003 7:37 am
Plan "B"
Now that Quentyn has awakened everyone in the Seven Villages, he might consider girding his loins with the glimmer rope. While that might be a bit uncomfortable, at least he'll be able to avoid an indecent exposure charge. 
- Madmoonie
- Cartoon Hero
- Posts: 2215
- Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2005 5:05 pm
- Location: Not a fuzzy clue.... (waves)
- Contact:
Claim it is some religious or cultural observance......That would probably not work anyway.
Jesus said to her, 'I am the resurrection and the life. He who believes in Me, though he may die, he shall live. And whoever lives and believes in Me shall never die. Do you believe this?' John 11: 25-26
----
Want a new avatar? Contact me and I can set you up with a new sig pic or avatar, totally FREE!
----
Want a new avatar? Contact me and I can set you up with a new sig pic or avatar, totally FREE!
-
Labrusca
- Regular Poster
- Posts: 385
- Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 3:13 pm
- Location: Directly over the center of the earth.
Re: Plan "B"
You'd think a species all covered with fur wouldn't have much of a taboo about nudity. Might be more of a matter of poor etiquette than a serious no-no.rich-online wrote:Now that Quentyn has awakened everyone in the Seven Villages, he might consider girding his loins with the glimmer rope. While that might be a bit uncomfortable, at least he'll be able to avoid an indecent exposure charge.
There's no insanity in my family. *I* have it all!!
I gotta wonder: Why is it that readers always assume that body hair=clothing?
It comes down to the fact that (even disregarding the biblical Fall of Man and the theological implications) in a sapient, bipedal species with a perpetual mating cycle (like humans,) intelligence and eyesight play a larger role in the mating process than scent or seasonal hormonal changes... and thus full frontal nudity is a sexual display. And sex, even in the most licentious society, is instinctually a private activity.
Yes, even in cultures where most everybody runs around almost completely naked--- those cultures that have almost no clothing generally have even stricter taboos about what is "publicly decent" than more modestly dressed societies. And NO human society accepts public sex or sexual displays as the cultural norm.... where it occurs in a given society is among the fringe element who are deliberately flaunting or aggressively violating the cultural norm for one cause or another.
Setting aside the fact that a fur coat doesn't cover everything, even a body with a thick layer of fur is an UNCOVERED body. This isn't some synthetic, seperate layer covering your body, it's PART of your body. The nakedness taboo would still apply.
It comes down to the fact that (even disregarding the biblical Fall of Man and the theological implications) in a sapient, bipedal species with a perpetual mating cycle (like humans,) intelligence and eyesight play a larger role in the mating process than scent or seasonal hormonal changes... and thus full frontal nudity is a sexual display. And sex, even in the most licentious society, is instinctually a private activity.
Yes, even in cultures where most everybody runs around almost completely naked--- those cultures that have almost no clothing generally have even stricter taboos about what is "publicly decent" than more modestly dressed societies. And NO human society accepts public sex or sexual displays as the cultural norm.... where it occurs in a given society is among the fringe element who are deliberately flaunting or aggressively violating the cultural norm for one cause or another.
Setting aside the fact that a fur coat doesn't cover everything, even a body with a thick layer of fur is an UNCOVERED body. This isn't some synthetic, seperate layer covering your body, it's PART of your body. The nakedness taboo would still apply.
"What was that popping noise ?"
"A paradigm shifting without a clutch."
--Dilbert
"A paradigm shifting without a clutch."
--Dilbert
- Madmoonie
- Cartoon Hero
- Posts: 2215
- Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2005 5:05 pm
- Location: Not a fuzzy clue.... (waves)
- Contact:
See, I was gonna say something like this, but I did not know how to put and everything sounded...........tacky, to say the least. Anyway, Quentyn is still naked in public. I still say he shoud use the rope to cover the most embarrasing parts. The glimmer rope can strech to what? 15 feet? Should be enough.
Jesus said to her, 'I am the resurrection and the life. He who believes in Me, though he may die, he shall live. And whoever lives and believes in Me shall never die. Do you believe this?' John 11: 25-26
----
Want a new avatar? Contact me and I can set you up with a new sig pic or avatar, totally FREE!
----
Want a new avatar? Contact me and I can set you up with a new sig pic or avatar, totally FREE!
Because there's an unspoken assumption in anthro comics, a kind of rule of natural modesty. Namely, so long as details aren't drawn, a furry character is still considered 'clothed' even if they are not wearing clothing. It's not so much a realistic expectation as a deliberate ignoring of certain parts of reality to make drawing and stories more convenient. Sorta like drawing a stick figure: it's assumed clothed unless you go out of your way to show otherwise, because it's a simplification.RHJunior wrote:I gotta wonder: Why is it that readers always assume that body hair=clothing?
You can choose not to do that if you like, but most people familiar with anthro comics will assume that by default.
Conquering the Universe, one class at a time...
-
Labrusca
- Regular Poster
- Posts: 385
- Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 3:13 pm
- Location: Directly over the center of the earth.
Not so much a matter of hair = clothing as the fur of many animals covers the sex organs to various degrees in a non-aroused state. Thus, lack of clothing in a bipedal, upright furry species might not be considered totally taboo, since the sexuality wouldn't be as obvious as in a hairless species. To show arousal would be a whole 'nother matter, and probably cause for a serious censure. Just speculating.RHJunior wrote:I gotta wonder: Why is it that readers always assume that body hair=clothing?
It comes down to the fact that (even disregarding the biblical Fall of Man and the theological implications) in a sapient, bipedal species with a perpetual mating cycle (like humans,) intelligence and eyesight play a larger role in the mating process than scent or seasonal hormonal changes... and thus full frontal nudity is a sexual display. And sex, even in the most licentious society, is instinctually a private activity.
Yes, even in cultures where most everybody runs around almost completely naked--- those cultures that have almost no clothing generally have even stricter taboos about what is "publicly decent" than more modestly dressed societies. And NO human society accepts public sex or sexual displays as the cultural norm.... where it occurs in a given society is among the fringe element who are deliberately flaunting or aggressively violating the cultural norm for one cause or another.
Setting aside the fact that a fur coat doesn't cover everything, even a body with a thick layer of fur is an UNCOVERED body. This isn't some synthetic, seperate layer covering your body, it's PART of your body. The nakedness taboo would still apply.
And since RH is writing TOTQ, he's free to set it up any way he wants. For this story, a nudity taboo works better anyway. Poor Quentyn.
There's no insanity in my family. *I* have it all!!
- The JAM
- Cartoon Hero
- Posts: 2281
- Joined: Fri Jan 01, 1999 4:00 pm
- Location: Somewhere in Mexico...
- Contact:
[...unWARP!!!]
Good evening.
Being a "Tiny Toons Adventures" and "Chip and Dale's Rescue Rangers" fan, I'm also inclined to the fur=clothes side.
Naturally, in this comic, we can see that it is obvious that the Rac Conans are "anatomically correct", or moreso than other anthro comics, such as The Changing Workplace, or even Room For One More, that had a recent storyline that dealt precisely with the issue of anthros and wardrobe. Don't worry, it's a clean comic, and rather funny, too.
Ralph chose this venue in his comic because of the comedy element. If there was nothing wrong with Quentyn being textileless, he could walk up to Meribeth and ask for the time of day and she'd gladly do so and not even blink, but what would be funny about that?
Then again, the Gragum don't wear anything below the waist, I think....
Good evening.
Being a "Tiny Toons Adventures" and "Chip and Dale's Rescue Rangers" fan, I'm also inclined to the fur=clothes side.
Naturally, in this comic, we can see that it is obvious that the Rac Conans are "anatomically correct", or moreso than other anthro comics, such as The Changing Workplace, or even Room For One More, that had a recent storyline that dealt precisely with the issue of anthros and wardrobe. Don't worry, it's a clean comic, and rather funny, too.
Ralph chose this venue in his comic because of the comedy element. If there was nothing wrong with Quentyn being textileless, he could walk up to Meribeth and ask for the time of day and she'd gladly do so and not even blink, but what would be funny about that?
Then again, the Gragum don't wear anything below the waist, I think....
- Mikhail Dragoslav
- Regular Poster
- Posts: 289
- Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2003 3:14 pm
- Location: New York
Depends on the author naturally, and how "humanoid" the characters look. If they look like people with animal traits, then the standard rules of modesty probably apply, like in Goblin Hollow and Nip and Tuck. If the furries are more cartoony, like Sonic the Hedgehog or the ones The J.A.M. mentioned, the rules might not.
BTW The J.A.M. did you notice your recent post count? Happy 1000 posts! Here's to a 1000 more!
BTW The J.A.M. did you notice your recent post count? Happy 1000 posts! Here's to a 1000 more!
There is something to be said for competent silence.