yeah, pretty much exactly that. I think the type of landscape is called Karst, or something like that.
Karst is more like carbonate, blocky, layered mountains that are typical of Bosnia. I thought that Fruska Gora is a different type.
Phact0rri wrote:
but I think we should talk about europe too. Speaking of the Balkans I tend to not put much separation in terms of culture. Even though I do know there's a lot of difference or there wouldn't be so much separation and fighting and stuff.
I don't know, I think that differences are mostly in details which will, normally, escape foreigner's eye. Like, types of music can be very different to me, but they'll all have distinct east-european vibe and will sound similar to foreigners.
Also if there's diversity, it's in regions that don't always match state borders. Northern serbian culture, for instance, has a lot of similarity with northern croatian and hungarian regions, while far west of Serbia has more in common with Bosnia than with far east, where dialect is similar to bulgarian language. They are small states with overlaping cultures, reliant on each other, and you'll often have troubles determining where some, I dunno, song or national meal originates from. You prolly won't be able to determine for sure even where Tesla is from.
A quick walkthrough:
West Balkan is pretty much consisting from ex Yugoslavian states, plus Albania.
Far western upper corner of Balkan is Slovenia. It's a small state populated by hard-working blonde people who managed to minimize the war damage and join EU pretty quickly (so far the only ex-Yu state that is in EU), being close to central Europe surely helped. They're mountainy, perpetually-skiing state that has a lot in common with some regions of Austria. Slovenian language is considerably different from serbian, I can't understand it very much.
Croatia... there's a lot to say about rivalry between Serbia and Croatia. Basically both nations believe that they should be the most influential and forward nations in west Balkans, and that all surrounding nations should be looking up to them. This, of course, happens to neither of us. Another part of rivalrly comes from the fact that they're Catholics and we are Orthodox, which is what much of animosity and in 90ies was built upon.
Croatia is arch-shaped around Bosnia, and as far as diversity goes, lower part of the arch on sea coast is considerably different from upper, Panonian part of the arch. Central area around Zagreb is, again, a different story, as is Dubrovnik, an ancient trading center of the region in medieval times. They're probably in mentality similar to us, although it's said that they believe that we're much more backward than them. But that depends on the area, as I hear that we're well liked in parts that are further from us, not so much in parts closer to us. The main difference is Austro-hungarian influence instead of our, Turkish.
However most of animosity is on the surface. I can testify that countercultures of Serbia and Croatia have always been connected and reliant upon each other. The fact that I mostly read croatian comic issues (better selection) and that you can find them in comic shops here, speaks for itself. Croatian tv shows are regularly shown on our tv. Also, zagreb always had a good rock, as did a few other cities.
As some might know, I consider Bosnia my second homeland. I am half-Bosnian (bosnian Serb, to be precise) and spent my childhood there. Bosnia is a rather nice country with abundance of mountains, but when you climb on top of the mountain, you usually meet great sights, chilly weather and cities scarcely arranged on the hills.
Bosna (full name Bosnia and Herzegovina, after it's two regions back in Yugoslavia) is populated by three nations: Bosniaks (bosnian moslems), Serbs and Croatians. It has an exit on mediteranian sea, a whole few miles of it.
Bosnians are stereotypically believed to be the nicest, warmest people in region, which I think is mostly true. In jokes, they are represented as very dumb. People from capitol Sarajevo have a specific sence of humor, popular accent, and a particular brand of folk-infused rock music that was enormously popular in Yugoslavia.
Bosniaks in particular are fine folks, unfortunately squeezed between two other megalomaniacal nations. My opinion is that after the war, they were the quickest to reach towards other nations to initiate reconciling, but politics and big interests got mixed up. Not having their separate national state, I think that Bosniaks were always aware just how strong connections between nations here have to be. Unfortunately, Bosnia is nowadays the poorest, most politically unstable country in Europe, with largest social gap (well, not counting Kosovo). Very unstable region where Powers That Be and awfully corrupted political leaders never allowed real reconciliation between nations.
East of Bosnia and Croatia are we. South, wedged between Bosnia and Serbia is Montenegro. It's a small state, largely dependent on it's seaside tourism. Montenegrians are in jokes stereotypically represented as lazy and unrealistically self-confident.
There's a joke where Montenegrians want to declare a war on USA because they heard that every country that has lost war to USA is now a powerful and rich global force. Then someone asks "but what if we win?"
A big part of their population believes that Montenegrins are actually serbian sub-section. Whether this is true or not, being small, they're very reliant on Serbia and large population of Montenegrins lives here. What defined Montenegro is their geography of very steep mountains; they descend from warrior tribes scarced around mountains, and lot of that tribal spirit is still present; they've never been neither under Otoman empire or Austro-Hungaria, because of their inacessible terrain and tribal warrior spirit.
South of Serbia is Albania and Macedonia. Macedonia is a lovely, hilly country with great folk music in 7/8 timing (*looks at Phact*) and great wines. Unfortunately it's also poor, poorer even than us. They're definitely the nation that yearns the most after Yugoslavia. Like Slovenians, they speak different language, but I can understand lots of it as it's similar to southern dialects of serbian, alas with different sentence construction and a lot of words that in Serbian are considered archaisms. They're another small nation that is very reliant of their neighbours, particularly us.
Macedonians claim ancient greek state of Macedonia and it's famous leader Alexander the Great (and conservely Cleopatra, I guess) as their cultural heritage. But actually, it's not, as today's Macedonians descend from slavic tribe that took name after the region that they moved in. This causes a lot of friction with Greece which reportedly puts a veto on accepting Macedonians into various international institutions.
Macedonians, like us, use cyrillic alphabet along with latinic, unlike other states where cyrillic isn't used.
Albania is the only west-Balkan country that wasn't in Yugoslavia and also isn't slavic. For most of 20th century it was under the most repressive communist regime next to China, and is still suffering consequences of long cultural isolation and destructive economical policy. But I hear they're working on it.
Between Albania and Serbia is Kosovo, either a former or current far southern serbian area, depending on who you ask. It's now mostly populated with Albanian people, with considerable serbian minority in north. As you might know, Serbia refuses Kosovo independence, altough it has no control over it's institutions whatsoever. But even without that, status of Kosovo is iffy, as it isn't really a self-sufficient state. Some believe that it will eventually either join Albania or re-join Serbia or, I dunno, became USA's military base or something. Anyways it's something of a wasteland, without much culture or economy to speak of, all of it being ruined by decades of violent conflicts and terror.
Eastern Balkan is mostly occupied by Bulgaria. We used to look down at bulgarians back in Yugoslavian time, as it was suffering under powerty and USSR's puppet regime, but now tables have kind of turned. Possibly, I'm not sure, Bulgaria is a member of EU, but reportedly they still have lower standard of living than us. I don't know much of Bulgarian culture, I hear that it's been poorer than ours (for instance, no tv production until 90ies). At times Bulgarians were considered Yugoslavia's closest partner being both slavic, Orthodox-christian and using cyrillic alphabet (even considered becaming a part of Yugoslavian union once in history); at other times we were in war with them, usually over Macedonia. East and south Serbians very easily understand bulgarian language. I don't get a word of it.
Oh and their type of vocal harmonizing in folk music is very popular here, thanks to Goran Bregovic.
Greece is occupying south of peninsula. I don't think that there's much of acient helenic left in them, I think that Otoman influences are nowadays much stronger. I mean, one would expect a strikingly different culture, their being predominantly helenic and our slavic, but asides from those strange letters they use, it's not. It's said that in major cities like Atina and Solun everyone speaks serbian as for a long time they've been our fancy place for seaside vacation.
Hungaria and Romania don't geografically belong to Balkan, being north of Danube, but I've seen them often lumped in the group because of cultural similarities.
Hungary is north of us, continental state often considered a part of central Europe. They belong to ugro-finic group of nations together with Finnish, making their language drastically different from all surrounding languages. With Slovenians, they're prolly most progressive of all nations I named, despite another USSR-puppet ex-regime, it's probably due to closeless to central europe, and due to agriculture - their land is flat as a pancake and very fertile.
As you imagine, boring for sight-seeing, but that's why their capitol Budapest is said to be one of prettiest towns in Europe. This is partly due to their great moment of history, when they became one of two constitutive nations in great Austro-hungarian empire, and during that time Budapest doubled as capitol with Vienna.
We tend to like Hungarian tamboura-driven folk music. They also have some good directors, particularly known for veeery slooow-moving films. Our stereotype of Hungarians is that their women are very promiscuous.
Romania is north of Bulgaria, largest country of all mentioned, another ex-USSR colony with one of more famous tyranical regimes behind them. They're nominally romanian nation, that is, close in language and heritage to Italians and French, but what with all the mixing here, that's somewhat dubious. They're best known for Transylvania and Dracula, although it's said that vampires were originally serbian myth before Bram Stoker placed them in Romania.
Dr Legostar wrote:McDuffies wrote:Emir Kusturica would like you to think that all Serbs are whimsical, fairy-tale creatures who know how to fly, but we actually aren't.
We're... we're not?
According to Makavejev we're sex-crazed ideologists. That's closer, I think.
I've decided where I want to go after London and Spain and Greece and Italy. Serbia. Before I leave Europe, I'm going to party with McDuffies.
That would be fun! Someone would probably try to teach you a few swears, claiming that they actually mean "good day".