Re: Stump that artist VI: Stump Hard ***NEW ENTRIES***
Posted: Mon Nov 03, 2008 8:07 pm
This made me goIVstudios wrote:For the new entrees:
First one looks like SteveRules.
All are welcome to join the fun.
http://forums.comicgenesis.com/
This made me goIVstudios wrote:For the new entrees:
First one looks like SteveRules.
Well, I didn't commit to the first one either...IVstudios wrote:Oh yeah? well your semi-gloating noncommittalGave you away for round 2. So nyaa!KWill wrote: 3. Style looks like Komi's, which should be an indicator that it probably isn't...![]()
REVERSE PSYCHOLOGYCaptainClaude wrote:Now that's over with I want people to explain why, in a game where you're trying to fool people into thinking you didnt draw something, you thought I would draw myself?
This is true, but keep in mind that while I couldn't lose on mine, I couldn't win on it, either, and mine was one of the easiest guesses (shown by 3 out of 4 getting it in the second round).Killbert-Robby wrote:Are you telling me I missed winning the second round by... one loss? Because LC had his own entry in there and couldnt lose on it?I FOR ONE AM PROUD OF HAVING COME SO CLOSE
Aw man well well done folks.
Everyone's a winner. Course, if we really wanted one name picked out, we should have defined who's the winner beforehand. If it's percentages, then the winner is LC, and if it's number of hits, it's a tie. Of course you can always say that in first round you had zero miss rate and therefore you're the overal winner, if you want.Are you telling me I missed winning the second round by... one loss? Because LC had his own entry in there and couldnt lose on it?I FOR ONE AM PROUD OF HAVING COME SO CLOSE
Aw man well well done folks.
Wow, it really kinda looks like you.Now that's over with I want people to explain why, in a game where you're trying to fool people into thinking you didnt draw something, you thought I would draw myself?
that's just stupid.
you stupids.
Now that's over with I want people to explain why, in a game where you're trying to fool people into thinking you didnt draw something, you thought I would draw myself?
that's just stupid.
you stupids.
Number of entries aside, it's a shame not many people were guessing.I think this year's contest turned out pretty well. The participation wasn't at the level of previous years, but it was also more fun to guess. I remember being somewhat irked last time, since I felt people were trying too hard to be ambiguous -- things like people drawing cartoon animals, realistic animals, watercolor landscapes, rear views, squiggly abstract lines, etc.
*checks your join date* Holy smokes, since you were in the Shmoe jam back when I joined up I thought you joined up around the time I did.LibertyCabbage wrote:This is true, but keep in mind that while I couldn't lose on mine, I couldn't win on it, either, and mine was one of the easiest guesses (shown by 3 out of 4 getting it in the second round).Killbert-Robby wrote:Are you telling me I missed winning the second round by... one loss? Because LC had his own entry in there and couldnt lose on it?I FOR ONE AM PROUD OF HAVING COME SO CLOSE
Aw man well well done folks.
Although, you definitely get props since you haven't been around CG as long I have, so GJ on that.
Man I was going to, til I forgot about it, came back and the deadline was pastMcDuffies wrote:You should have sent an entry, though, to ease guessing for folks a bit.![]()
Hmm... maybe I was thinking of Stump That Artist II.McDuffies wrote: Last year a portrain was a requirement, but then some people drew portraits without a face, or turned under some ambigiuos angle. Not quite in spirit of the contest.
LibertyCabbage wrote:#3: Was pretty easy to guess since KWill did his normal inking style.
Drat. And I tried so hard to imitate Komi's shading and linework... =/McDuffies wrote:3. I've seen Kwill draw in this style elsewhere. It's that angular half-profile cheekbone line which is similar on both his chibis and his more realistic drawings, that would be a giveaway for me.
Taken straight out of my Communist propaganda book on uniforms, actually.LibertyCabbage wrote:#7 & #11: I switched the artists of these two: it seems KWill and McD ink more similarly than I thought. Although, I think KWill might've been trying to imitate McD's style (where it seems McD was going more after Claude's).
-.-McDuffies wrote:12. I would have totally guessed Claude, for large, round, moonlike faces and tiny eyes, and sloppy colouring.