Posted: Sun Mar 11, 2007 10:17 am
Yeah... there really should have been more evil alien invasions in high school.
That's pretty cleverChaosBurnFlame wrote:There's a very simple resolution to any plagurism...
If you stated your artwork is not to be reproduced elsewhere, and the art is then used elsewhere, then clearly it's in violation.
I found when that has happened to me that threats of a copyright suit don't quite have the same effect as sending the party a bill for using your art (including time, materials, etc) stating they could keep it up, as long as they pay that bill for services rendered.
That usually gets a quick response.
The offending party removed the material within 3 days of getting the bill (which I marked to around $800).ivstudios wrote:That's pretty cleverChaosBurnFlame wrote:There's a very simple resolution to any plagurism...
If you stated your artwork is not to be reproduced elsewhere, and the art is then used elsewhere, then clearly it's in violation.
I found when that has happened to me that threats of a copyright suit don't quite have the same effect as sending the party a bill for using your art (including time, materials, etc) stating they could keep it up, as long as they pay that bill for services rendered.
That usually gets a quick response.. Has anyone ever actually sent you money?
The bill was worded to state it was payment for use of artwork in the context they wished on that serverspace, and that any future artwork by me used by them would warrant a second bill and any derivative works or money made from said derivative works would belong solely to me, the original creator of said works...ivstudios wrote:Still not bad. I guess you'd have to be careful how you went about that, though. If you were to word the bill wrong they could send you the money and wind up with the rights to your work. (Unlikely, but I could totally see that sort of thing happening.)
No. Wait....wait....yes...nope, still no.TRI wrote:Am I the only one weirded out by the fact that this topic has managed to turn into Leperdoctor and Dominic Durgan having a friendly chat about Dominic Deegan?
Actually, my vote goes to that he really is trying to woo her then dump her. In DD universe, bad guys aren't allowed to have positive character traits, so I don't think that feeling of sincere love is even written in his (sic) character sheet. Plus, according to codex of this comic, dating a girl who is ugly because of huge fangs seems to be the act of ultimate sacrifice and maturity, less chance that bad guy should have it.leperdoctor wrote:Yeah...I like grasping at straws. It's a past time of mine!! I think I'll slam my head on the desk if it turns out that Neileen is trying to get Luna to actually have her...because, like you mentioned, lots of other girls...Dominic Durgan wrote:This is what we in "the biz" call "too much credit".
Though I think it's implied that Luna is actually really pretty, besides the teeth thing.
http://www.dominic-deegan.com/view.php?date=2002-07-06

I think you meant "lame anti-climax and terrible, worthless pun for no reason whatsoever"Legendary wrote:Hey, Mookie? There's something about story structure called Rising Action, Climax, Falling Action.
It's not "Overdrawn, repetitive sequence of barely-connected events" followed by "Ridiculously quickly resolved lame anti-climax."
That's true- did Celesto defend her because he truly felt something for her, or was it simply because she was just another bad guy, and he wanted to make a point at the injustice of the situation?McDuffies wrote:I actually thought that Celesto's love was portrayed rather negatively, at first as a lusty love (with threesomes and murder plans and all) and comic's tone is usually judgemental about lust and open sexuality in general - and later I got the impression that bad character could only love another bad character - because of similar character traits, perhaps? Celesto was the only one to condemn her clod-blooded murder, and in the context of him being taken away to prison, it seemed as if he had done that only because he was a bad guy himself.
I think the only plot twist I shook my head at was when the three major bad guys came back from the death. That plot twist has been done to death- ZOMG, this major bad dude is still ALIVE?! But other than that, I didn't notice any real rip-offs, but it might be because I have a strange taste in movies and cartoons. Care to list some of the rip-offs?Dominic Durgan wrote:It's a case of "Mookie see, Mookie do" - pretty much every plot twist in Deegan is Mookie trying to emulate something he's seen before, and not doing it very well at all. Which is why I believe that Dominic Durgan is a much more original comic than Dominic Deegan, borrowed art or not
Doctor Who + Harry Potter = Dominic Deeganleperdoctor wrote:I think the only plot twist I shook my head at was when the three major bad guys came back from the death. That plot twist has been done to death- ZOMG, this major bad dude is still ALIVE?! But other than that, I didn't notice any real rip-offs, but it might be because I have a strange taste in movies and cartoons. Care to list some of the rip-offs?
gigawatts.Dominic Durgan wrote:...run 1.21 jigawatts