K-Dawg wrote:So then do I get an apology?

I'm sorry for killing you twice.
On topic: I am actually rather conflicted about this. The constant idealization of the female body in medias etc DOES worry me. I think well about 90% of the women I know have some sort of issue with their body shapes, including me. I know many women who have had or do have eating disorders of different kinds, my mother being the prime example... But I digress.
Look at women in art a few hundred years ago...
http://www.artcyclopedia.com/history/hi ... sance.html
http://www.artcyclopedia.com/history/vi ... icism.html
(I'm sure there are better examples, but I had not much time to google for them.)
And look at this painting:
http://www.allposters.com/-sp/Birth-of- ... 99861_.htm
Their proportions were healthy and natural and, imo, beautiful. Now, I realize that comics are not fine art, there is a difference and that's okay. But I do wonder why this difference so often results in overly exaggerated big boobs and sickeningly thin waists. I mean, comics are definitely about caricature and stylizing, but there ARE other ways, you know.
Another thing that bothers me is when comic characters sulk about how unattractive and ugly they are when they JUST. DON'T.
LOOK IT. 
I mean, if the girl in the comic with a visually perfect body shape says she feels fat, how is the girl with 10 pounds overweight who reads the comic supposed to feel about HER body?
On the other hand, I confess that I like drawing idealized women myself, though I wouldn't say I'm extreme when it comes to breast size and that. I try to keep the proportions SOMEWHAT realistic, unless I draw full cartoony style (which rarely happens though). And yet I sometimes feel guilty for not drawing girls with big noses, or bad skin, or chubby/fat girls, or girls with damaged hair. I don't know why.
I guess I like to reach for what is perfect in my book, but at the same time, am turned off by other people's exaggerated idealizations.
My name is Cookie, sorry I'm late.
