Comic Genesis Forums

No, ketchup.

Prawns with Ketchup Thats "Tomato Sauce" for my fellow Aussies??

dude, thats just WRONG

Could be worse, like mustard instead.

Kevin Wolf wrote:Does Russ Meyer qualify as "porn" by today's hardcore standards?

Mhhh... it's hard to say... There was pretty hard-core stuff in his time too.
On the other hand, hypocrites like Playboy want to be reffered to as "tasteful nudity", "erotics" or even "art photography", which pretty much meddles the thing. Sod'nly, porn is not good enough for them...

mcDuffies wrote:Sod'nly, porn is not good enough for them...

Porn will always be good enough for me.

RPin wrote:

mcDuffies wrote:Sod'nly, porn is not good enough for them...

Porn will always be good enough for me.

I'm reminded of the "C is for Cookie" song....

mcDuffies wrote:

Kevin Wolf wrote:Does Russ Meyer qualify as "porn" by today's hardcore standards?

Mhhh... it's hard to say... There was pretty hard-core stuff in his time too.

Yeah, no kidding...but was any of it directed by Russ Meyer?

Does Russ Meyer give anybody but Roger Ebert a woody? Seriously? I think the ultimate answer to "Is this porn?" is, "Can you imagine a relatively normally sexual human male stroking it to this imagery?"

Warren wrote:

RPin wrote:

mcDuffies wrote:Sod'nly, porn is not good enough for them...

Porn will always be good enough for me.

I'm reminded of the "C is for Cookie" song....

*sings*
The internet is for porn...
the internet is for porn...
so grab your stick and doulbe-click for porn, porn, porn!

(Funny thing is, this song is sung by a cookie-monster wannabe)

Kevin Wolf wrote:

mcDuffies wrote:

Kevin Wolf wrote:Does Russ Meyer qualify as "porn" by today's hardcore standards?

Mhhh... it's hard to say... There was pretty hard-core stuff in his time too.

Yeah, no kidding...but was any of it directed by Russ Meyer?

I wanted to say, if he was considered porn then, then he probably is now too. Emphasis on the "if".

Does Russ Meyer give anybody but Roger Ebert a woody? Seriously? I think the ultimate answer to "Is this porn?" is, "Can you imagine a relatively normally sexual human male stroking it to this imagery?"

Well, despite what you think, seems like people in sixties thought otherwise, as Meyer got bloody rich thanks to his films. Because then, ultimate answer would be: "Were all those people going to see his films for 'clever plots'?"

It's tittilating, to be sure...every healthy heterosexual male enjoys looking at breasts. I'll always look at a nude breast if it's there to be looked at...but it doesn't necessarily mean I'm masturbating while doing it.

Kevin Wolf wrote:..every healthy heterosexual male enjoys looking at breasts...

Sweeping generalizations are FUN!

HeDanny wrote:

Kevin Wolf wrote:..every healthy heterosexual male enjoys looking at breasts...

Sweeping generalizations are FUN!

But would looking at a woman's breasts qualify as a fetish or is a more instinctual reaction?

Isukiyomi wrote:

HeDanny wrote:

Kevin Wolf wrote:..every healthy heterosexual male enjoys looking at breasts...

Sweeping generalizations are FUN!

But would looking at a woman's breasts qualify as a fetish or is a more instinctual reaction?

It's only a fetish if it's an activity that wouldn't ordinarily or reasonably result in a sexual reaction.

Looking at breasts does not = fetish.

Getting off while looking at goldfish = fetish.

JPSloan wrote: Looking at breasts does not = fetish.

Getting off while looking at goldfish = fetish.

*morosely adds another fetish to his ever-lengthening list*

JPSloan wrote:

Isukiyomi wrote:

HeDanny wrote: Sweeping generalizations are FUN!

But would looking at a woman's breasts qualify as a fetish or is a more instinctual reaction?

It's only a fetish if it's an activity that wouldn't ordinarily or reasonably result in a sexual reaction.

Looking at breasts does not = fetish.

Getting off while looking at goldfish = fetish.

What about looking at naked cartoon characters?
And please be precise on furries.

[quote="dictionary.com"]fet