..in an unrelated note, I just wasted three seconds of my life.mcDuffies wrote:*signature*

From where I sat, people were trying to justify why the phrase "let the old man have his values, and you have yours" was used. I let comment go, but I'll admit, I was just waiting for someone to give me something to dispute. That comment really irked me. I'm not sure how you saw the discussion, but I saw it as trying to justify one man's beliefs because everyone else thought the same way and as long as they don't pick up a rock it's fine. I realize I misread you and I'm sorry, but I still feel like that undertone was there, if not in your post than just in some of the other people also trying to defend the comment.mcDuffies wrote:Well, it is only unfair to judge a person based on only one thing you've heard about him, and I think that's what Rkolter was trying to say.Rocknjosie wrote:I never lived in the Jim Crow south, but from what I know I'd have to disagree. From the average of two lynchings a week, to the postcards in general stores featuring pictures of lynchings, to the schools closed so that kids could go watch a lynching, to no job opportunity, to schools only being desegregated post 1950...and the list goes on. Obviously I broke a few laws of debating bringing in Nazi Germany, but I don't think it's unfair to compare Jim Crow south and before to Nazi Germany in the ghettos phase.rkolter wrote:I don't think it's right to compare the racism this grandfather showed with Nazi Germany during WWII. While both are obvious cases of racism, it is not on the same level. nor do I think it's fair to suggest that if he is a racist like that in the 1970's, that he must have been much worse in the 1950's in the South.
While there are a LOT of people with racist attitudes, those attitudes often extend no further than a subconcious response. When faced with their racism, these people tend to be embarassed by it.
To try to give a parallel example, I know a lot of people here who dislike gays, but I can guarantee you that they are, in fact, very good people. None of them would ever hurt a gay, throw a stone at them or anything based on their personal dislike. Sure, they were raised not to like people of alternative sexual orientation, but that doesn't mean that they are deprived of compassion, sence of equality or any other human characteristics.
And then, there is a nice saying: "Dog that barks doesn't bite".
But then again, I don't think that your post was as much a stretch as it had virtually nothing to do with what I was saying. We talk about whether it's reasonable or fair to ask a very old man to change his complete views of life in his last days of life, and you bring in great historical human injustices, fear of death and whether someone could be forgiven or not (but we were not even mentionong any forgiveness because we weren't talking about any crimes in the first place). You seem to have brought the topic only because it's something that currently interests you, not because it was related to the topic of discussion. I just decided to keep shut up hoping that this pointless discussion won't go further, but it did. Blah.
You know what, I don't like what you're doing.Tolerance of cultures goes both ways, remember.
Let the Nazis have their views and you have yours.
*cough*
Maybe you haven't realised, but you're pointing fingers and shouting "RACIST!" just now. That's something you should never do in a discussion like this.
I don't see why people are so offended by this.Dutch! wrote:Tolerance of cultures goes both ways, remember.
Let the old feller have his views and you have yours.
The problem is that racism is looked upon as being aberrant behavior in our culture (in general), and not tolerable behavior. Although a wide range of behaviors is acceptable, there are some behaviors that aren't...Nicotine wrote:I don't see why people are so offended by this.Dutch! wrote:Tolerance of cultures goes both ways, remember.
Let the old feller have his views and you have yours.![]()
You can't change the views of someone who has been thinking like that for so long, so why waste your time doing it. I think that's basically what this means. So what's the problem...?
I know that. What I mean is that if a guys been racist all his life no matter what you do your not going to change that.FinbarReilly wrote:The problem is that racism is looked upon as being aberrant behavior in our culture (in general), and not tolerable behavior. Although a wide range of behaviors is acceptable, there are some behaviors that aren't...Nicotine wrote:I don't see why people are so offended by this.Dutch! wrote:Tolerance of cultures goes both ways, remember.
Let the old feller have his views and you have yours.![]()
You can't change the views of someone who has been thinking like that for so long, so why waste your time doing it. I think that's basically what this means. So what's the problem...?
FR
So yours was the "preaching vs. acting" arguement? No, it's really not that. I remember the old saying: "God give me courage to change what I can change, calmness to accept what I can't change and wiseness to differ those two".Rocknjosie wrote:From where I sat, people were trying to justify why the phrase "let the old man have his values, and you have yours" was used. I let comment go, but I'll admit, I was just waiting for someone to give me something to dispute. That comment really irked me. I'm not sure how you saw the discussion, but I saw it as trying to justify one man's beliefs because everyone else thought the same way and as long as they don't pick up a rock it's fine. I realize I misread you and I'm sorry, but I still feel like that undertone was there, if not in your post than just in some of the other people also trying to defend the comment.
Here, here! ^_^mcDuffies wrote: But what I really ask is that noone points fingers and acuses others of racistm, not even implicitely. Racism is a very hard accusation and you shouldn't base it on undertones that you think you've seen in posts, different interpretations of posts from the point of view that you've chosen, glancing a post with one eye without thinking thoroughly what the poster wanted to say or whatever was the reason. Until someone steps out and says something undoubtedly racist, I think that there's no basis in looking at them with hatred. As far as I remember, no regular poster here has ever said something racist, shown resentment toward people of different race, or even advocated racism (despite what someone implied here, being easy on an old man who happens to be a racist does not mean advocating entire racism).
So let's put the ball down.
Yeah, but the guys are cool while the girls are all stalkers, psychos, or more masculine than the guys. You're a horrible, horrible person and should be punished for your transgressions.Warren wrote:There is no need for race to be an issue in my comic. Never came up.