Zortic wrote:So how do you define what is and isn't a webcomic?
So I have no authority to tell hundreds of voters that they're wrong.
And yes, this is the only official WCCA spot for the general public.
But remember, we're not talking about a generic "comic" category. We're talking about a category specifically for the use of animation. So how do you reward the use of Flash, then disqualify a comic because it uses Flash?
So it's a pure animation category then?
Because there are a lot of works that use Flash (and variants) as an interface or as a way to produce smaller file sizes that arent animations, Merlin Goodbrey's works for example. But they sure aint cartoons.
Zortic wrote: So who's most qualified to determine the subjective?
Bear in mind that none of this is disagreeing with you. What needs to be done is more public education. I really appreciate what you're doing. Not only are you asking people to think before they vote, but you're offering suggestions and encouraging people to look at other options. Please keep that up, not only here, but anywhere you see a WCCA discussion going on.
Boneweasel wrote:I think the masses should be educated first on this issue before being educated concerning Homestar Runner.
William G wrote:Because there are a lot of works that use Flash (and variants) as an interface or as a way to produce smaller file sizes that arent animations.....
Boneweasel wrote:Now I'm not saying that outstanding story/art/writing, etc. shouldn't be considered when voting for a flash comic, BUT if that is all that is being considered, then the flash category shouldn't exist. That's what the other categories are for.
brideau wrote:This year I didn't even nominate anyone in the flash catagory, because I don't really know any cartoons that use Flash.
brideau wrote:And it's kind of weird, there are a lot of cartoons out there that DONT use flash that do things that can not be done in print comics using animated gifs, and hyperlinks.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests