Page 2 of 3
Posted: Thu Aug 16, 2007 9:31 am
by Error of Logic
Lulujayne wrote:EOL, maybe you'd be surprised by the numbers of full-service clients who are virgins, also handicapped etc. NOT that I equate the two as similar.
Maybe I would, maybe I wouldn't. But do many of them get taken places for that service by their parents?
Posted: Thu Aug 16, 2007 9:59 am
by Swordsman3003
It's per se not per say. Eggcorns are my enemy.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Per_se
Posted: Thu Aug 16, 2007 10:07 am
by WangyJohn
Perse is finnish for ass, or arse, rather.
Posted: Thu Aug 16, 2007 10:18 am
by Lulujayne
Yup, you're right darl', and I'm knackered.
Posted: Thu Aug 16, 2007 12:50 pm
by Honor
>.>
Interesting choice of an enemy...

Can you see three superheros lined up on a hill, capes in the breeze...
1: I'm going to fight Poverty!
2: I'm going to fight Injustice!
3: I'm going to fight Eggcorns!
1: What the...?
2: Dude. Seriously. Eggcorns?
3: Well... Yeah.
1: Eggcorns.
3: Well... I mean... As, you know, a
function... Of... um... fighting against the impending collapse of free and clear communication between human beings due to an overall and far-reaching degeneration of linguistic capability, precision and competency in general...
1&2: (Look at each other)
1: Oh, well, yeah then...
2: I can totally see that.
3 sounds a lot like me, now that I think about it...
Posted: Thu Aug 16, 2007 1:47 pm
by Seth Marati
I already knew about "per se", but I did have to go to Wikipedia to look up "eggcorn".
Posted: Thu Aug 16, 2007 2:10 pm
by Xero
Honor wrote:
3 sounds a lot like me, now that I think about it...
I do the same thing sometimes
usually contradict myself right after to see if people catch it >.>
Posted: Thu Aug 16, 2007 7:22 pm
by Fnyunj
Seth Marati wrote:It's still damned creepy, to be pressured into sex by a parent in order to uphold an artificial standard. I bet if the genders were reversed for all three parties, there'd be an outright scandal.
heh -
Think of the converse. Everyone else is pressured into not-sex, by parents, into uphold an ACTUAL artificial standard.
A natural standard would be all of us FUCKING at age 11.
Posted: Thu Aug 16, 2007 7:24 pm
by Xero
fnyunj wrote:Seth Marati wrote:It's still damned creepy, to be pressured into sex by a parent in order to uphold an artificial standard. I bet if the genders were reversed for all three parties, there'd be an outright scandal.
heh -
Think of the converse. Everyone else is pressured into not-sex, by parents, into uphold an ACTUAL artificial standard.
A natural standard would be all of us FUCKING at age 11.
old enough to bleed old enough to breed?
if theres grass on the field time to play ball?
Posted: Thu Aug 16, 2007 7:27 pm
by Fnyunj
I just want to be certain, I am not advocating a natural biological standard for humans. Just wanted to point that out. There are important legitimate reasons we live in our box.
On the other hand, I agree with Honor, about decriminalization of prostitution. That particular box is kind of silly.
Posted: Thu Aug 16, 2007 7:39 pm
by Xero
fnyunj wrote:I just want to be certain, I am not advocating a natural biological standard for humans. Just wanted to point that out. There are important legitimate reasons we live in our box.
On the other hand, I agree with Honor, about decriminalization of prostitution. That particular box is kind of silly.
in nevada where this is filmed prostitution is legal
my friend lives about a 1/4 mile away from that place
her mom even used to work there(not a working girl though, their boss)
Posted: Thu Aug 16, 2007 7:43 pm
by Honor
marginally important to point out... legal in part of Nevada.
Still not legal in the parts where it would do the most good to have it legalized, of course.
Posted: Thu Aug 16, 2007 7:45 pm
by Xero
Honor wrote:marginally important to point out... legal in part of Nevada.
Still not legal in the parts where it would do the most good to have it legalized, of course.
thats always the case isn't it?
Posted: Thu Aug 16, 2007 7:49 pm
by Honor
...certainly seems so.
wicked powerful Mormon voting block in Las Vegas.
Anyone want to bet me that Romney takes that voting district (if such is possible) in the upcoming generals?
Posted: Fri Aug 17, 2007 12:12 am
by Bustertheclown
Well, I like the show. I would definitely pay for time with Isabella Soprano. The condemnation that the editorial flings out there is pretty skewed. I'd wager there's a huge difference between the life of a street-walker whose life is horrible enough to warrant being including in one of HBO's infamously horrifying "investigative" documentaries, and the life of a woman who works in a high-paying, legal, regulated, and safe environment, like the Bunny Ranch.
It reminds me, though, of a conversation I'd had with a former madam once:
"I worked as a madam once," she said, "It was my job to keep the shotgun. I only had to take it out once."
Oh, and a fidgety teenager who's in a state of nervous discomfort over his first lay? SHOCKING! I only wish I had paid for my first time. It certainly would have de-mystified sex for me, which would have been quite helpful to me in my younger adulthood.
Posted: Fri Aug 17, 2007 12:24 am
by Churba
if theres grass on the field time to play ball?

Posted: Fri Aug 17, 2007 12:25 am
by Xero
Churba wrote:if theres grass on the field time to play ball?

rule 34 at work yet again eh?
Posted: Fri Aug 17, 2007 4:59 am
by Churba
I'd call it softcore 34 at best.
Posted: Fri Aug 17, 2007 5:57 am
by WangyJohn
I have hardcore 34 for Harry Pothead.
Will post at a better time.
Posted: Fri Aug 17, 2007 7:32 am
by Swordsman3003
there's no time like the present.