Page 1 of 1
simpsons ad
Posted: Wed Jul 18, 2007 6:53 pm
by Halo299
LINK
i heard about this through some of my pagan circles. Apparently some people are very upset over this. I don't really have that strong of an opinion one way or the other, but i do think it is kinda odd.
-halo
Posted: Wed Jul 18, 2007 7:10 pm
by Aeridus
I agree that it's odd, for sure... wouldn't say it's good or bad though myself. But at least Homer isn't making out with the pagan fertility symbol.
Posted: Thu Jul 19, 2007 7:22 am
by Squidflakes
I think its fucking hilarious, and the "pagan community" should lighten the fuck up.
Posted: Thu Jul 19, 2007 7:32 am
by Seth Marati
The fact that the offended are thinking about using "rain magic" to wash away the image is enough to tell me we shouldn't be taking these people very seriously. And you'd think a group of people who hold in high esteem a giant painting of a guy with a raging boner would have senses of fucking humor.
Posted: Thu Jul 19, 2007 7:33 am
by Ghastly
Posted: Thu Jul 19, 2007 7:41 am
by WangyJohn
Ghastly wrote:
First idea I had to

Posted: Thu Jul 19, 2007 8:15 am
by Halo299
perhaps i am rare among pagans, but i don't see any point in wasting that much energy trying to make it rain to wash away something that is going to be gone soon anyway.
if the image is offensive to the gods, then won't the gods take care of it themselves?
i bet if they had put Homer dressed up as the pope or something and pissed all the papist off, then the 'pagan community' would be telling them to lighten up.
-halo
Posted: Thu Jul 19, 2007 8:45 am
by Ghastly
WangyJohn wrote:
First idea I had to

You can almost hear the Woohoo!
Posted: Thu Jul 19, 2007 9:59 am
by Kittyboymuffin
Hee. This reminds me of Lords and Ladies by Terry Pratchett, in which ancient Oggham runes said "I have a really huge tonker" or words to that effect, according to Nanny Ogg ... ``
Posted: Thu Jul 19, 2007 10:25 am
by Unholy
I have no idea why the pagans are making such a huge deal about it; itll wash away in days and everyone will have forgotten about it in a month. It the article they called it a place "definitely of great historical significance". Historical significance?! its a chalk drawing not the fucking grail. I didnt even know the damn thing existed until I read the article. They need to chill the fuck out.
Posted: Thu Jul 19, 2007 8:37 pm
by Aeridus
Ghastly wrote:
Nice!

Is that a hole in one or a one in hole?
