Yay! Its throw down time!
Irish Witch wrote:
Read a history book other than your own. The reason the war ended was solely because a German scientist defected and litterally handed over the secrets to the German codes.
No no no no no no! No more foreplay!
The 'reason' the war ended is because a large force of American infantry and armor were headed at Berlin from the North and West, and an even larger force of Red Army infantry and armor were headed there from the East. Rounds were fired, lives were lost. German morale collapsed in the face of this join assault, but there was still enough resistance left to make the capture of Berlin a bloody and drawn out affair. The leader of the German state killed himself, a good portion of his underlings were incapable of running a right proper war, and German production had been squandered on Vengance weapons instead of good ole conventional arms. (with the exception of the jet fighters, which would have made the air war over german MUCH deadlier for the Allies had Hitler not had his head in his ass in regards to the me262)
Due to the daylight bombing raids on the oil production/storage and ball bearing factories of Germany by the American 3rd Airforce, the implacible defense of England by the RAF, the covert operations against sensitive targets carried about by the SAS and SBS, Germany was unable to supply her armies with the fuel, parts, and replacements needed to keep it functioning as an effective fighting force. This was further aggrivated by Hitler fighting was could be considered a 4 front war, the utter shattering of German communications encryption (done by the Polish, delivered by the French, constantly kept decryped by some hard working English women, who were provided updates and needed food and fuel by the Americans)
The reason most Americans think we won the war is because we did. Our part of the war anyway. The European front had NOTHING to do with America. We provided more material, food, fuel, and logistics support than anything else. Yes, we sent troops, and not a small number, but it still wasn't our war. On the other side of that stick, the Soviet Union provided 13,600,000 brave soldiers. 13 MILLION soviet lives, and those were just military losses, toss in another 7.7 MILLION civilian deaths from a duet by Stalin on the pistol to the back of the head in the middle of the night (that big fat bastard) and the German Army on the Panzerkampfwagen, and you start to see where the blood came from.
All you Americans did was to shoot an atom bomb at a city and you know how that ended up!
That's all we did? May I remind the lady that is was two nuclear weapons, not one, at a cost of $1,889,604,000 in 1945 dollars, or just over 21 BILLION dollars today. Not to mention the loss of 77,676 troops in the Pacific theater, along with an utter shit ton of shipping, aircraft, and armor.
One thing I will not stand for is the bashing of America's contribution to the war effort. Yes, a lot of Americans like to think that a single American soldier armed with rifle, pistol, combat knife, and smoldering stub of a cigar single handedly slaughterd every single German, Japanese, and Italian soldier that came across his path, but us here on these forums know better. America may not have supplied the MOST of anything, but what we did do is send 295,000 of our young men off to their deaths, most of the time, defending or liberating someone elses home. Like the former homes of the 3.5 MILLION brave Chinese soldiers who gave their lives to the Japanese. We could have taken the more European tactic of rolling over and claiming that it wasn't our war, but we're not like that. We're more like the English (big suprise) who paid their debt to the tune of 452,000 soldiers and 60,000 civilians.
Irish Witch wrote:
And English isn't derived from a german dialect, so much.
Yes, yes it is. English is a germanic language, meaning, derived from... GERMANIC. German was also derived from Germanic.
Irish Witch wrote:
It is derived primarily from the Roman Language crossed over with the Nordic base and influenced by Gaelic roots!
No, no its not. The languages derived from Latin (the Roman Language) are Italian, French, Spanish, and Portuguese.
English borrows words with Latin roots, Nordic roots, and in some extremely rare cases Urdu roots. Gaelic is almost dead, and only influences Lorenna McKennet albums and SCA members with too much time on their hands. I can think of exactly one Gaelic word that has made it into an English lexicon, and even that isn't used all that much anymore.
Infinity-Iz-Blue wrote:
I was referring to the stereotypical fat-bastard texan with a loud shirt and a camera
Right, I'll do you for that!
Behold Squiddy.. a fat bastard texan in a loud shirt and a camera
I am of course the one with the facial hair, and the camera.. well, that's what the picture was take with. And you said we didn't exist!
