Page 1 of 1

A defense that all can be proud of.

Posted: Tue Mar 02, 2004 7:53 pm
by Skizotoro
http://www.sky.com/skynews/article/0,,3 ... 53,00.html
But Tatam's counsel denied he was a paedophile, pointing to the fact that the child porn pictures were only a small fraction of his total collection of between 10 and 20 million images
pedophilia is usually an unforgivable crime to me. But god damn, with a defense like that I just have to respect the guy.

Posted: Tue Mar 02, 2004 8:00 pm
by Inky
"And there's hardly any rat in it!"

Posted: Wed Mar 03, 2004 3:46 am
by Happypeepeehead
Maybe I don't understand British law, but how could his girlfriend be uncharged if he had hard copy printouts on a nightstand they shared? Well, the main lead was the credit card info, but still, in the US, I believe they'd get her too for being an accessory.

Then again, that's the Sky News. I didn't expect the whole of it.