New Year Resolutions

Error of Logic · Post by **Error of Logic** » Fri Jan 13, 2006 2:44 pm

And according to Weird science, "More than a handful is wasted." ... Weird science clearly never had to suckle twins or triplets.

Swordsman3003 · Post by **Swordsman3003** » Fri Jan 13, 2006 2:55 pm

While that may be true in your experiance, Honor, I've read a crapload of stuff on gifted individuals. Statistically, smarter men are attracted to smaller breasts, and vice versa. I've been reading Kinsey's stuff as well, and while I'm no 0, you can't call me gay.

Indigo Violent · Post by **Indigo Violent** » Fri Jan 13, 2006 4:01 pm

I do not get the obsession with breast size. Admittedly, breasts are not the sexiest part of a woman in my opinion so I don't fuss over their appearance much, but I still think they're pretty great no matter what size they are. (I also don't understand the Pepsi/Coke distinction. Maybe they're linked.) Although, if not for the scarring and expense involved, I'd probably reduce mine.

Kingofthemorlocks · Post by **Kingofthemorlocks** » Fri Jan 13, 2006 4:07 pm

I used to think smaller breasts were nicer too...then my girlfriend's breasts went from a B to a C, and now look to be on the verge of D, and I couldn't be happier.

ManaUser · Post by **ManaUser** » Fri Jan 13, 2006 4:10 pm

swordsman3003 wrote:Statistically, smarter men are attracted to smaller breasts, and vice versa.

So small breasts are attracted to smart men? Or smart breasts are attracted to small men?

Swordsman3003 · Post by **Swordsman3003** » Fri Jan 13, 2006 5:17 pm

I misused the term. I meant, stupid people are highly likely to be attracted to large breasts.

Honor · Post by **Honor** » Fri Jan 13, 2006 5:22 pm

I'd like to see those studies. The first possible statistical oversight that comes to mind lies in wondering if it takes into account the possibility that smarter people subconsiously think that liking the less popular attribute makes them more likely to bag people who share that attribute.

As long as everyone prefers gold, for instance, people like myself who prefer silver have it pretty good.

In the end, though, there are good, solid evolutionary reasons why most people prefer a C- to D-cup. People with higher IQ's individually like a lot of things that are not the preference of the majority... It could be, in many cases, something as simple as subconcious differentiation. It'd be difficult for me to give NASCAR, NFL, or WWF a fair shake, if all I knew about them was the profile of the typical fan.

Toawa · Post by **Toawa** » Fri Jan 13, 2006 6:57 pm

Honor wrote:I'd like to see those studies. The first possible statistical oversight that comes to mind lies in wondering if it takes into account the possibility that smarter people subconsiously think that liking the less popular attribute makes them more likely to bag people who share that attribute.

As long as everyone prefers gold, for instance, people like myself who prefer silver have it pretty good.

We, in this country (US) , are rediculously overawed by diamonds. Give me rubies any day; they have some class, some substance. Plus you can make lasers out of them.

Honor wrote:In the end, though, there are good, solid evolutionary reasons why most people prefer a C- to D-cup. People with higher IQ's individually like a lot of things that are not the preference of the majority... It could be, in many cases, something as simple as subconcious differentiation. It'd be difficult for me to give NASCAR, NFL, or WWF a fair shake, if all I knew about them was the profile of the typical fan.

I wonder if there were any studies correlating IQ with, shall we say, interesting sexual tastes...

Squidflakes · Post by **Squidflakes** » Sat Jan 14, 2006 12:43 am

Yea, diamonds are pretty fucking worthless. Not that you can pick them up for cheap, but the resale value on a regular diamond is almost 0. Unless its famous or an exceptionally rare type or color, diamonds are one of the most over priced, over rated, abundant clear crystals on the planet.

Nithos · Post by **Nithos** » Sat Jan 14, 2006 12:43 pm

Honor wrote:Where have I heard that list before...
Oh yeah! All my guy friends who later decided they were gay.

I think that needs another clause... gay, or liars

An attraction to subtle things is usually a form of mental masturbation, at least it was in my case; it's a sense of rising above the perceived 'base' impulses to be attracted to the biggest breasts and focus on the more romantic/enlightened attributes. Not to say there's anything wrong with all that, but there's something to be said for a nice rack (however, 'nice' and 'big' aren't always paired in the same pair). Intelligence is also a must, or at the very least everything else better be really damn nice if intelligence is lacking.

And I wouldn't trust any research on gifted individuals myself, it tends to done by people with high IQ's and low self esteem who are looking for something to reinforce the former and boost the latter, proper research methods be damned. Now if it's well documented and peer-reviewed in a scientific journal, and stands up to criticism, I'd give it a second look.

Gible · Post by **Gible** » Sat Jan 14, 2006 3:41 pm

When it comes to racks, breasts or any other part of the bosdy for that matter, I think Cosplay Girl said it best: "Presentation is everything." The only difference is how you like your meat displayed.

Honor · Post by **Honor** » Sat Jan 14, 2006 4:18 pm

To continue your analogy, then, you won't mind if we pay the same amount for steaks, I get a sixteen ounce fillet, and you get four ounces of chuck? ...I mean... So long as it's arranged nicely on the plate, right?

Gible · Post by **Gible** » Sat Jan 14, 2006 7:04 pm

Honor wrote:To continue your analogy, then, you won't mind if we pay the same amount for steaks, I get a sixteen ounce fillet, and you get four ounces of chuck? ...I mean... So long as it's arranged nicely on the plate, right?

Cost being a whole different issue but as long as they can make four ounces of chuck steak look like a large slab of venison T-Bone sure...

otoh...once the wrapping is removed there are a whole bunch of fun breast games you can play that just don't work with smaller breasts.

Shirt Guy Xom · Post by **Shirt Guy Xom** » Sat Jan 14, 2006 10:40 pm

Well, let me be the one to return to the topic. This year I have one resolution: Make some freakin' dough.

Alter alias · Post by **Alter alias** » Mon Jan 16, 2006 12:24 pm

Going along on the whole with topic thing (I think I might still be in time at least one cultures new year)

I solemnly swear to:

back all my arguments with fact
drink less
work out more (this one seems popular)
and always know a girls name before going any further than kissing (in all fairness I did appologise later)

Goddessmisca · Post by **Goddessmisca** » Mon Jan 16, 2006 12:55 pm

Mine is: one guy at a time, no matter how serious or not it may be, cause while I've never done it in a serious relationship I have had to choose before for casually going out with a couple... and thats no fun