YOUR CHARACTER COULD BE SLOTH IN "JACK"

Bustercharlie · Post by **Bustercharlie** » Sun Mar 17, 2002 6:27 pm

Dave told me to spread the word. He can't think of a good character to be 'sloth' so he will acution it off. All you have to do is submit your weight, and a picture of your real life self as proof. The fattest forum member will have his or her furry alter-ego appear in the comic 'Jack' as "sloth".

Go ahead, post the pics! BTW do not try and cheat by posting other peoples pics, the winner will have to send a scan of their drivers lisence or other valid photo ID as proof of their fatty-ness

DarkBlood_Warwing · Post by **DarkBlood_Warwing** » Sun Mar 17, 2002 6:46 pm

god has spoken and chossen me.
I'm 85 lbs.

*nods*

Karma Leafbarer · Post by **Karma Leafbarer** » Sun Mar 17, 2002 6:49 pm

I'll have all forum members know that Dave has informed me this morning that if he ever shows the embodiment of Satan in his comic, it will be Buster Charlie o.o

Foddercat · Post by **Foddercat** » Sun Mar 17, 2002 6:50 pm

That's a little harsh... Satan's not that bad.

......

Man... I'm slipping.

Cypress · Post by **Cypress** » Sun Mar 17, 2002 8:32 pm

I don't know... I'm 180 lbs and about 6' tall... guess if I had the capitol I would go to a gym! (Nothing much to lose, but gaining a little beefcake would be nice!)

Bwahahahahaaaa... I'm pathetic I know, but hey! that's me.

Now where did I put my edible shampoo?

Cypress · Post by **Cypress** » Sun Mar 17, 2002 8:34 pm

Uh... I keep on forgeting which symbol is feet, and which one is inches!

"<-->Inches?
'<-->feet?

Gah! I'm confused!!!

Krikkit · Post by **Krikkit** » Sun Mar 17, 2002 9:17 pm

Wouldn't the fattest member be gluttony?

CPOK · Post by **CPOK** » Sun Mar 17, 2002 9:43 pm

179centimeters tall 79 kilograms in weight. Don't ask me what that is in imperial cause I don't know. Us Aussies work in real weight and mesurment system.

AtmanRyu · Post by **AtmanRyu** » Sun Mar 17, 2002 10:58 pm

CPOK - That would be roughly 5'10", 160 lbs

As for the nomination, you'll probably have better luck if someone posts this in a fat fur list; most of its users can really fit the position.

Vazagi · Post by **Vazagi** » Sun Mar 17, 2002 11:02 pm

Fat fur comming up:

Note: This ain't something i've drawn....
_________________
Proof that the gene pool has needed a water change since 1983.

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: Vazagi on 2002-03-17 23:03 ]</font>

AtmanRyu · Post by **AtmanRyu** » Sun Mar 17, 2002 11:10 pm

See what I mean?

Striker · Post by **Striker** » Mon Mar 18, 2002 12:25 am

Neat. The quintessential 'fat cat'.

And I'd say gluttony shouldn't be the fattest, actually. After all, he/she is always hungry, and a classic 'hungry' appearance includes such features as an emaciated body with ribs showing through the skin. Which is, incidentally, what we can see with Bob/Lisa's 'composite body'.

Sloth is lack of effort. Gluttony implies at least some kind of effort - all of which is directed towards satiating hunger of some kind or other, of course.

Vazagi · Post by **Vazagi** » Mon Mar 18, 2002 12:31 am

Sloth is lack of effort.

Or perhaps the will to do ANYTHING to avoid real work, and not thinking of the consequences...

Krikkit · Post by **Krikkit** » Mon Mar 18, 2002 1:18 am

I don't really see how Gluttony can directly corellate to being under-nourished. Insatiable hunger, certainly making sense, but being in "excess of eating or drinking" (going by textbook definition) seems to me to be more directly attributable to hedonistic greed than any sort of need for food.

El SillY · Post by **El SillY** » Mon Mar 18, 2002 1:27 am

Why should Sloth be fat? Eating requires effort and with no eating no fat, so I say Sloth is Sloth se7en style, i.e thin as hell. He might expand due to air in his belly though (ever seen pictures from e.g Auswich?).

Krikkit · Post by **Krikkit** » Mon Mar 18, 2002 1:30 am

Auschwitz.

El SillY · Post by **El SillY** » Mon Mar 18, 2002 1:40 am

whoops, that's right.

Bustercharlie · Post by **Bustercharlie** » Mon Mar 18, 2002 2:36 am

On 2002-03-18 00:25, Striker wrote:
Neat. The quintessential 'fat cat'.

And I'd say gluttony shouldn't be the fattest, actually. After all, he/she is always hungry, and a classic 'hungry' appearance includes such features as an emaciated body with ribs showing through the skin. Which is, incidentally, what we can see with Bob/Lisa's 'composite body'.

Sloth is lack of effort. Gluttony implies at least some kind of effort - all of which is directed towards satiating hunger of some kind or other, of course.

technicaly glutton is NOT being always hungry. It's consuming more than you need. Bob and Lisa, in hell, NEED food all the time because they are 'starved' as a punishment, but in life they ate more than they needed, they ate other furs for the fuck of it.

Bustercharlie · Post by **Bustercharlie** » Mon Mar 18, 2002 2:37 am

On 2002-03-18 00:31, Vazagi wrote:
Sloth is lack of effort.
Or perhaps the will to do ANYTHING to avoid real work, and not thinking of the consequences...

Sloth is the avoidance of physical or spiritual work.

Cypress · Post by **Cypress** » Mon Mar 18, 2002 3:55 am

Giving out Dav's thoughts much Buster?

Nah, I'm just rubbing your fur the wrong way, (What an odd expresion!)

More theories = good! 'specialy if they make sense.

_________________
Arena Master
_________________
What happens when you die? Flip the switch and find out!

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: Cypress on 2002-03-18 03:55 ]</font>