Is there really a grey line?
-
ThingfromtheDeep
- Regular Poster
- Posts: 159
- Joined: Fri Jan 01, 1999 4:00 pm
- Location: Boston, MA
- Contact:
Well, yeah. I mean, you can do something wrong, but not be as bad as someone else doing the same thing. Let's say you run over a kid with your car. Did you do it A) By a complete freak accident?, B) Because you were driving to fast and not paying attention?, or C) Because your buddy dared you to do it?
I'd say at least one of those is worse than the others!
I'd say at least one of those is worse than the others!

-
Cypress
- Cartoon Hero
- Posts: 1153
- Joined: Fri Jan 01, 1999 4:00 pm
- Location: Canada, thats all youll get!
- Contact:
I'm still undecided on this one myself... I have heard people say there is only "Black and White", while I heard others say "There is no such thing as black or white, only different shades of gray..." I'm in a bind! it helps me out in no way. 
Arena Master
_________________
What happens when you die? Flip the switch and find out!
_________________
What happens when you die? Flip the switch and find out!
-
Twist
- Newbie
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Fri Jan 01, 1999 4:00 pm
- Location: lancaster pa united states
- Contact:
One could as easily question that there were black and white, wondering if they wernt just something we were reading into an infinitely more compicated, and thus gray universe.
Ultimately definitive morals would give us purpose, meaning, and boundreys, which can be said to be just confort food for social harmony.
Ultimately definitive morals would give us purpose, meaning, and boundreys, which can be said to be just confort food for social harmony.
- Urban Wild Cat
- Regular Poster
- Posts: 47
- Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2002 4:00 pm
- Location: Australia
- Contact:
-
Kendrakirai
- Regular Poster
- Posts: 177
- Joined: Fri Jan 01, 1999 4:00 pm
- Location: Kelowna, BC, Canada
- Contact:
Actually, things are for the most part, black and white.
It's just that everyone, deep, DEEP down, is a hypocrite. I am, you are, so's your neighbor Bill. Deep down, we all feel that whatever rules apply to everyone else don't apply to us.
Thus why so many people used napster...They'd never actually steal the CDs, but downloading the entire thing in mp3 and burning it to CD, well, that's not really *hurting* anybody, so it's okay. Besides, they'll never come after little me.
The best thing you can do is accept the fact you're a hypocrite, I feel. You'll be less guilt-ridden, you won't have to make excuses to yourself anymore, and it's far less stressful. Just make sure that 'common sense' prevails over hypocracy.
Deep down, we're all selfish. Even the most altruistic person is selfish...They'll say they do things because it feels good to do so. That's a form of selfishness. You're making yourself feel good. Sure you're helping others feel good too, but that's just an excuse you tell yourself.
Maybe I'm just too cynical...naaahhhh.
It's just that everyone, deep, DEEP down, is a hypocrite. I am, you are, so's your neighbor Bill. Deep down, we all feel that whatever rules apply to everyone else don't apply to us.
Thus why so many people used napster...They'd never actually steal the CDs, but downloading the entire thing in mp3 and burning it to CD, well, that's not really *hurting* anybody, so it's okay. Besides, they'll never come after little me.
The best thing you can do is accept the fact you're a hypocrite, I feel. You'll be less guilt-ridden, you won't have to make excuses to yourself anymore, and it's far less stressful. Just make sure that 'common sense' prevails over hypocracy.
Deep down, we're all selfish. Even the most altruistic person is selfish...They'll say they do things because it feels good to do so. That's a form of selfishness. You're making yourself feel good. Sure you're helping others feel good too, but that's just an excuse you tell yourself.
Maybe I'm just too cynical...naaahhhh.
I agree with this. Someone who accidentally killed another person would be completely unprepared and (most likely) wreaked by guilt, whereas someone who had planed on killing another person has to have a certain amount of emotional padding to even carry it out in life... I depends on the person i guess. Some would probably feel equally bad in both cases, and some would fell no guilt at all, and so on...Are you saying if you knocked a pot off of a balcony by accident and it fell and killed someone, that would be WORSE than purposefully throwing it off the balcony because you WANT to kill someone???
Threads don't have points... Needles do.
-
Arcaton
- Regular Poster
- Posts: 210
- Joined: Fri Mar 15, 2002 4:00 pm
- Location: London, England
- Contact:
Hmmm..I read the post wrong, thinking that what was meant was that deliberate murder wasn't as bad morally as accidental killing.
It's interesting to see the rationalisations used by killers to prove to themselves that their crime was the fault of the victim....esp. those dear ladies who revenge themselves on hubby by murder rather than divorce. I believe that some people could convince themselves of the correctness of ANYTHING they might do. Guess where they will prob. wind up?
It's interesting to see the rationalisations used by killers to prove to themselves that their crime was the fault of the victim....esp. those dear ladies who revenge themselves on hubby by murder rather than divorce. I believe that some people could convince themselves of the correctness of ANYTHING they might do. Guess where they will prob. wind up?
The wisest thing I ever heard said about the line between good and evil was that which way you're facing is more important than which side of the line your on. Sort of like the line between two armies on a battlefield. It might get messy at times, but some people are charging the enemy and some people are running away and leaving their friends to face things alone.
Someone said that there's no such thing as being 100% good or evil (Unless your God, maybe). I agree. This doesn't mean there is a line. There's a difference between a line between good and evil existing and a person on a particular side of the line being all good or all evil.
The way I see it, everyone is a sinner. The trick is to choose the sins God can forgive.
Someone said that there's no such thing as being 100% good or evil (Unless your God, maybe). I agree. This doesn't mean there is a line. There's a difference between a line between good and evil existing and a person on a particular side of the line being all good or all evil.
The way I see it, everyone is a sinner. The trick is to choose the sins God can forgive.
-
ThingfromtheDeep
- Regular Poster
- Posts: 159
- Joined: Fri Jan 01, 1999 4:00 pm
- Location: Boston, MA
- Contact:
It really depends on what you mean by 'really'.
Does the universe really orient itself on a good/evil axis? From what I've seen , no. Good and evil is a cultural device used to create a stable society , and it's not universal even amoung humans at that , as other cultures use different axis to determine what's 'right' and 'wrong' , such as the Duty-honor/dishonor axis , and so on.
In my opinion , if you want a really functional axis , you must accept degrees between the two ends of the spectrum otherwise the system is too inflexible and rigid to deal with real situations as well.
Does the universe really orient itself on a good/evil axis? From what I've seen , no. Good and evil is a cultural device used to create a stable society , and it's not universal even amoung humans at that , as other cultures use different axis to determine what's 'right' and 'wrong' , such as the Duty-honor/dishonor axis , and so on.
In my opinion , if you want a really functional axis , you must accept degrees between the two ends of the spectrum otherwise the system is too inflexible and rigid to deal with real situations as well.
