You love me?

Allan_ecker · Post by **Allan_ecker** » Wed May 16, 2007 9:59 pm

I've been seeing.... signs of strain in that department...

Cyril_Dran · Post by **Cyril_Dran** » Thu May 17, 2007 2:23 pm

Tetramorpheus wrote:
Cyril_Dran wrote:And, you can be impressive and a pompous ass at the same time, you know.
I take it this comment excludes those who are pompous asses of an impressive degree, or would that simply be the best of both worlds?

If what you're impressive for is being a pompous ass, bonus points, I say.

Micro_Fur · Post by **Micro_Fur** » Thu May 24, 2007 5:34 pm

Buck wrote:Area code 135 doesn't really exist, I guess?

In the 'States the radix prefix for the toll center starts with a valid sequence but the local toll index numbe doesn't work. It would end up being a service data line number for testing. All of the international readers out there familiar with the workings of their telecom system might have a better chance of a match. But as fare as Allan is concerened that number simply doesn't exist => real world plot device.

For those interested state-side:

1(AAA)BCC-DDDD
Where AAA=trunk switching toll locator, B=local trunk switchboard number, CC=switchboard district number, DDDD=end user ID

Micro_fur - No, I never was a phreaker. <_<

Allan_ecker · Post by **Allan_ecker** » Thu May 24, 2007 6:15 pm

Micro_Fur wrote: Micro_fur - No, I never was a phreaker. <_<

Suuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuure ya weren't.

Micro_Fur · Post by **Micro_Fur** » Thu May 24, 2007 6:51 pm

allan_ecker wrote:
Micro_Fur wrote: Micro_fur - No, I never was a phreaker. <_<
Suuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuure ya weren't.

Hey, if thay haven't found out then I must not have been. Just like I'm not 'really' queer.

Micro_fur - You're only in trouble if you get caught.

E_voyager · Post by **E_voyager** » Thu May 24, 2007 9:44 pm

how i wish i had that kind of insight but ah well. catch me if you can and i'll confess to things even if i didn't do thin seems the be the lay of the land. all you need is proof that i really did something bad in the first place and in that case i'm safe since i stay clean

Buck · Post by **Buck** » Thu May 24, 2007 10:47 pm

Micro_Fur wrote:Micro_fur - No, I never was a phreaker. <_<

Showing your age.

GreatLimmick · Post by **GreatLimmick** » Thu May 24, 2007 11:01 pm

Micro_Fur wrote:Hey, if thay haven't found out then I must not have been. Just like I'm not 'really' queer.

Micro_fur - You're only in trouble if you get caught.

A case of quantum mischief? Schrödinger's misdeed?

Micro_Fur · Post by **Micro_Fur** » Fri May 25, 2007 6:11 am

Buck wrote:
Micro_Fur wrote:Micro_fur - No, I never was a phreaker. <_<
Showing your age.

The days of XB and SBS are long gone, they were very good for those seeking anomonimity. The blue box isn't what it used to be. *sigh*

Micro_fur - Age is relative, knowlege is quantitative, wisdom is the index.

Micro_Fur · Post by **Micro_Fur** » Fri May 25, 2007 6:14 am

GreatLimmick wrote:
Micro_Fur wrote:Hey, if thay haven't found out then I must not have been. Just like I'm not 'really' queer.

Micro_fur - You're only in trouble if you get caught.
A case of quantum mischief? Schrödinger's misdeed?

Schrödinger didn't just have a cat you know.

Micro_fur - And you thought it all began with a bootstrap parodox.

GreatLimmick · Post by **GreatLimmick** » Fri May 25, 2007 11:13 am

Does anything actually begin with a bootstrap paradox? Or does it merely continue?