On the one hand, a very true observation os the nature of the perception of time.
On the other hand, a sudden mental image of things naughty indeed.
But probably not accurate. I picture Pierce on top, so to speak.

Cinni
It has been my observation that your supposition of athletes' positions is more often precision than in opposition.Cinni wrote:But probably not accurate. I picture Pierce on top, so to speak.
Well yeah! I thought it was obvious that the big guy wouldn't want to crush the little guy. Same applies for when you substitute the word "gal" for either occurence of the word "guy." Or both.DetailBear wrote:It has been my observation that your supposition of athletes' positions is more often precision than in opposition.Cinni wrote:But probably not accurate. I picture Pierce on top, so to speak.
Mag.DetailBear wrote:It has been my observation that your supposition of athletes' positions is more often precision than in opposition.
You have no idea how many times I've said that.allan_ecker wrote:That ship may not have sailed per se but it sure as hell is pulling up the anchor and getting all the masts lined up.
:DetailBear wrote:It has been my observation that your supposition of athletes' positions is more often precision than in opposition.
:
To quote Dead Like Me:
"Which one of you is, you know, the man?"
"We're both men. We're gay. Men."
Thank you. I was quite proud of it when I wrote it. And on my lunch, too.allan_ecker wrote:Mag.DetailBear wrote:It has been my observation that your supposition of athletes' positions is more often precision than in opposition.
Freaking.
NIFICENT.
Alfy, there are only two of them. That's not exactly a Towers of Hanoi situation.Alfador wrote:Well yeah! I thought it was obvious that the big guy wouldn't want to crush the little guy. Same applies for when you substitute the word "gal" for either occurence of the word "guy." Or both.DetailBear wrote:It has been my observation that your supposition of athletes' positions is more often precision than in opposition.Cinni wrote:But probably not accurate. I picture Pierce on top, so to speak.
Of course, given the probable musculature and stability of large athletic persons, I'm probably exaggerating the Towers of Hanoi assumption.
Alright, I think I need a PM to explain Towers of Hanoi to me. My attempts at google fu only picked up baby toys. =^^;=Alfador wrote:Alfy, there are only two of them. That's not exactly a Towers of Hanoi situation.Cinni wrote: Of course, given the probable musculature and stability of large athletic persons, I'm probably exaggerating the Towers of Hanoi assumption.
Honestly!aki_no_kaze wrote:The_Fox wrote:That explains a lot, on the second read through. I have a dirty mind, and somehow mistook that for a sexual position. =^^;=
- Jarylan, at least that explains the images Google kept showing me...
disks, rods, no idea how you could have got that in your head
Which brings me back to my earlier point: There are only two of them.allan_ecker wrote:Honestly!aki_no_kaze wrote:The_Fox wrote:That explains a lot, on the second read through. I have a dirty mind, and somehow mistook that for a sexual position. =^^;=
- Jarylan, at least that explains the images Google kept showing me...
disks, rods, no idea how you could have got that in your head
I mean, in this context, evoking the Towers of Hanoi, a game where you slide rings over three different pegs in one combination after another, over and over again just ~screams~ all-man threesome.
Oh wait I typed that out loud.