Page 5 of 6

Posted: Sun Feb 12, 2006 8:21 am
by Gengar003
Y' worry too much.

Posted: Sun Feb 12, 2006 9:01 am
by DetailBear
Naaaah. I'm not worried. Others might have been, though.

Posted: Sun Feb 12, 2006 9:19 am
by Andrick
No, Gengar, I don't think we worry enough. I put in my own home address and watched 26 sexual offenders pop up within 1 mile of where I live, most of whom were charged with lewd acts against persons under the age of 15. That's how I found out that the nice old man living in the building next door was convicted of oral copulation with a 14 year old in the '90s. Just because we don't have anyone proclaiming that they go that way shouldn't mean we invite the conditions to make such possible. I second what DB said because it's good advice.

Posted: Sun Feb 12, 2006 9:41 am
by Maximuscoolman
Not going to happen with affore mentioned girl, at least not any time soon.

While I still insist I want an orgy for my birthday, it's looking about as possible as it did in November. I'll see if I can't get at least something to add here though.

Actually, there has been a lot of hype about the Aneros. If no one here has had any experience with one (or rather if no one here is going to describe their experiences with one) and all my plans fall through, perhaps I'll get one for my birthday.

Posted: Sun Feb 12, 2006 10:22 am
by Allan_ecker
Andrick wrote:No, Gengar, I don't think we worry enough. I put in my own home address and watched 26 sexual offenders pop up within 1 mile of where I live, most of whom were charged with lewd acts against persons under the age of 15. That's how I found out that the nice old man living in the building next door was convicted of oral copulation with a 14 year old in the '90s. Just because we don't have anyone proclaiming that they go that way shouldn't mean we invite the conditions to make such possible. I second what DB said because it's good advice.
This thread is for adults discussing (in alarmingly frank terms) adult topics. Minors should not be here. Period.

I'm trying to maintain this forum's ultra-low moderation status, but if I keep having minors in adult-related threads I'm just going to start killing all adult-related threads.

Posted: Sun Feb 12, 2006 10:47 am
by Maximuscoolman
It would probably be useful to give the exact age that one would be considered a minor.
Here the age of consent is 16 and I see no logical reason that you can't discuss sex if you can have it but people tend to stick with 18 when it comes to the internet. I'm a bit unsure so some minors it concerns might be too...

Posted: Sun Feb 12, 2006 11:36 am
by Micro_Fur
Andrick wrote:No, Gengar, I don't think we worry enough. I put in my own home address and watched 26 sexual offenders pop up within 1 mile of where I live, most of whom were charged with lewd acts against persons under the age of 15. That's how I found out that the nice old man living in the building next door was convicted of oral copulation with a 14 year old in the '90s. Just because we don't have anyone proclaiming that they go that way shouldn't mean we invite the conditions to make such possible. I second what DB said because it's good advice.
*Cowers in fear in the corner sucking his thumb* I went there and found out there are two convited rapists currently on parole living in the same appartment building as me. My area caped out with 79 living within 1/2 a mile. Now I am really scared to go jogging at night. *Starts rocking breathing erraticaly.*

Micro_fur - Sometimes you REALLY didn't want to know things like that!

Posted: Sun Feb 12, 2006 11:48 am
by Allan_ecker
maximuscoolman wrote:It would probably be useful to give the exact age that one would be considered a minor.
Here the age of consent is 16 and I see no logical reason that you can't discuss sex if you can have it but people tend to stick with 18 when it comes to the internet. I'm a bit unsure so some minors it concerns might be too...
It's all about America, I'm afraid. Here we use 18, which wholly UNcoinicidentially is also the age at which a person is considered an adult and independant from one's parents.

And as this site is hosted in America, that's the standard. Sorry all.

(Point of fact, in Japan cassol203 would already be considered old enough to see this stuff.)

Posted: Sun Feb 12, 2006 12:06 pm
by Gengar003
allan_ecker wrote:(Point of fact, in Japan cassol203 would already be considered old enough to see this stuff.)
And would also have already seen much, much "worse."

Posted: Sun Feb 12, 2006 1:18 pm
by Maximuscoolman
allan_ecker wrote:
maximuscoolman wrote:It would probably be useful to give the exact age that one would be considered a minor.
Here the age of consent is 16 and I see no logical reason that you can't discuss sex if you can have it but people tend to stick with 18 when it comes to the internet. I'm a bit unsure so some minors it concerns might be too...
It's all about America, I'm afraid. Here we use 18, which wholly UNcoinicidentially is also the age at which a person is considered an adult and independant from one's parents.

And as this site is hosted in America, that's the standard. Sorry all.

(Point of fact, in Japan cassol203 would already be considered old enough to see this stuff.)
It's kind of amusing then to think that this thread was created by a minor.

Posted: Sun Feb 12, 2006 1:56 pm
by Gengar003
Aw great. Now he'll close it for sure :( [size=0](Sarcastically)[/size]

OOh that reminds me of something! I've probably mentioned this before, because I like this story, but a while back on my personal website's forums, there was this guy prone to using profanity. And one day some kids at his school really pissed him off and he posted a giant, profanity-filled rant about them. He was kind enough to preface it with a warning "Strong language. Suggested 15+" (I'm not kidding...).

The kicker? He was 13 at the time. A nice WTFLOL moment right there, that was.

Posted: Sun Feb 12, 2006 2:18 pm
by Allan_ecker
I'm perfectly aware that the system is totally, totally insane.

I'm just not sure what I can do to make sure everyone's asses are covered.

:-?

Posted: Sun Feb 12, 2006 2:21 pm
by Gengar003
You could pass out free loincloths to all of us...

Posted: Sun Feb 12, 2006 3:57 pm
by Micro_Fur
Funny comment Grengar, but I think this is a little more serious than that. :-?

Posted: Sun Feb 12, 2006 4:53 pm
by Gengar003
What's been posted's been posted; deleting or editing may prevent future mishaps, but, as they say, what's done is done.

My self-appointed job is to be a constant source of levity and/or non-seroiusness when everyone else is being serious, or to be quite serious when everyone else is chipper.

Sure, it is more serious, but what can I do? Nothin'. Ergo, mischief.

...

Ignore the last sentence. I just really wanted to say "ergo."

Re: Music video

Posted: Tue Feb 14, 2006 5:34 pm
by Alfador
DetailBear wrote:http://www.goodiebag.tv/video/do_you_take_it.htm

Not Work Safe.
Not Parent Safe.
Nearly naked breasts.
DO NOT watch while drinking any liquids.
FWAHAHA! Awesome. XD

Posted: Wed Feb 15, 2006 12:59 pm
by Maximuscoolman

Posted: Wed Feb 15, 2006 4:03 pm
by Gengar003
The fact that it's a "learn english" commercial makes it that much more awesome. :lol:

Posted: Wed Feb 15, 2006 6:47 pm
by Allan_ecker
Is it a bad sign that I already know what commercial that is without following the link?


Engels Lerhen?

:twisted:

Posted: Thu Feb 16, 2006 8:19 pm
by Candide
maximuscoolman wrote:Actually, there has been a lot of hype about the Aneros. If no one here has had any experience with one (or rather if no one here is going to describe their experiences with one) and all my plans fall through, perhaps I'll get one for my birthday.
I own one.

It's not a bad toy. Sometimes, it puts a bit too much pressure on my perineum. It does hit the prostate more. But, then again, so does a thicker dildo. ;)

The main benefit of the Aneros over other toys is that you can wear it while having sex (if you're topping), without it slipping out or without pushing it out. I've only ever used mine solo, however. So, I can't say what it does when you're having intercourse with someone.